A motivational phone call improves participation to screening colonoscopy for those with a positive FIT in a national screening programme (NCT 03276091).

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of individuals with a positive faecal immunologic test (FIT) will never undergo the recommended colonoscopy despite a full sequence of reminders. AIMS: This prospective study aimed to recruit refractory individuals by a motivational personalised phone call given by a screening physician. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of a motivational phone call given by a physician of the screening organisation in order to convince patients with positive FIT to undergo a colonoscopy. RESULTS: 115 individuals with a positive FIT were targeted. After GP phone call, it was ascertained that 15 had had a colonoscopy, one died, one moved outside the region, and the GP refused the study phone call for 13. Finally, we attempted to call 85 individuals; 24 could not be reached, 5 colonoscopies had been performed, and thus 56 individuals were included. The main reason for colonoscopy refusal (33.9%) was wrong advice from the GP or the gastroenterologist. Among those included, 33.9% (19/56) underwent the colonoscopy within 22.7 months after FIT; 1 invasive cancer, 18 adenomas and 9 serrated sessile lesions were found. CONCLUSION: Motivational phone call performed by a physician from the screening organisation is effective to recruit a third of refractory individuals. Education for GPs and gastroenterologists is necessary to increase participation to colonoscopy and to avoid the performance of an inappropriate secondary FIT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 03276091.

Colon capsule versus computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer screening in patients with positive fecal occult blood test who refuse colonoscopy: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: Some patients (10 % - 32 %) with a positive guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) do not undergo the recommended colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and computed tomography colonography (CTC) in terms of participation rate and detection outcomes when offered to patients with a positive gFOBT who did not undergo the recommended colonoscopy. METHODS: An invitation letter offering CTC or VCE was sent to selected patients after randomization. Acceptance of the proposed (or alternative) procedure and procedure results were recorded. Sample size was evaluated according to the hypothesis of a 13 % increase of participation with VCE. RESULTS: A total of 756 patients were targeted. Following the invitation letter, 5.0 % (19/378) of patients underwent the proposed VCE and 7.4 % (28/378) underwent CTC, (P = 0.18). Following the letter, 9.8 % (37/378) of patients in the VCE group underwent a diagnostic procedure (19 VCE, 1 CTC, 17 colonoscopy) vs. 10.8 % in the CTC group (41/378: 28 CTC, 13 colonoscopy; P = 0.55). There were more potentially neoplastic lesions diagnosed in the VCE group than in the CTC group (12/20 [60.0 %] vs. 8/28 [28.6 %]; P = 0.04). Thus, 15/20 noninvasive procedures in the VCE group (19 VCE, 1 CTC; 75.0 %) vs. 10/28 in the CTC group (35.7 %; P = 0.01) resulted in a recommendation of further colonoscopy, but only 10/25 patients actually underwent this proposed colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Patients with a positive gFOBT result who do not undergo the recommended colonoscopy are difficult to recruit to the screening program and simply proposing an additional, less-invasive procedure, such as VCE or CTC, is not an effective strategy.ClinicalTrials.govNCT02558881TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized, controlled trial NCT02558881 at clinicaltrials.gov.

Comparison of stillbirth rates by cause among Haitians and non-Haitians in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of stillbirth among Haitians and non-Haitians in Canada. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data on all stillborn and live-born singletons weighing at least 500 g in the province of Quebec, Canada, from 1981 to 2010. Stillbirth rates were computed, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for Haitians relative to non-Haitians. The main outcome measure was stillbirth by cause of death. RESULTS: Data for 9657 stillbirths (124 Haitian) and 2 414 751 live births (17 165 Haitian) were included. Stillbirth rates were higher for Haitians than non-Haitians (7.17 [95% CI 5.91-8.43] vs 3.96 [95% CI 3.88-4.04] per 1000 births), particularly for cord prolapse (adjusted HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.18) and placental abruption (adjusted HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.95-4.15). Haitians had higher risks of stillbirth due to cord prolapse and abruption at every week of pregnancy. Risks were not elevated for stillbirth due to congenital anomaly, a cause less responsive to urgent intervention. CONCLUSION: Stillbirth rates among Haitians are disproportionately high in Canada, particularly fetal death due to cord prolapse and placental abruption. The potential to reduce stillbirth rates through optimal emergency care in vulnerable minorities requires further investigation.

Stillbirth rates among Haitians in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Data on cultural groups at risk of stillbirth in high-income countries are scarce. We sought to determine disparities in stillbirth by gestational age for Haitian vs. non-Haitian Canadians. METHODS: We used data on 10,287 stillbirths and 2,482,364 livebirths from 1981-2010 in the province of Quebec, Canada. Stillbirth rates for Haitians were compared with non-Haitians using fetuses at risk denominators, and Cox proportional hazards regression models with gestational age as the time scale. RESULTS: Stillbirth rates were much higher for Haitians than non-Haitians during the study period (7.2 vs. 3.9 per 1000 total births). Disparities between Haitians and non-Haitians were largest at 32-36 weeks of gestation [hazard ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.61, 3.07]. CONCLUSIONS: Stillbirth rates in Haitian Canadians giving birth in Quebec are exceptionally high. Disparities were greatest during the late preterm period.