[Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect: how and when?] / Chiusura percutanea di difetto interventricolare post-infartuale: come e quando?

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a rare but clinically severe complication of acute myocardial infarction. Although cardiac surgery is the gold standard to correct post-infarction VSD, transcatheter closure represents an effective therapeutic alternative in selected cases. However, the correct timing for VSD correction is a matter of debate. Herein, we report the case of a patient who underwent transcatheter closure of post-infarction VSD, focusing the discussion on the pros and cons of an early VSD correction.

[Periprocedural management of anticoagulation therapy and in-hospital outcomes in patients with warfarin indication undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Data from the WAR-STENT registry]. / Gestione periprocedurale della terapia anticoagulante ed esiti intraospedalieri nei pazienti con indicazione a warfarin sottoposti ad angioplastica coronarica. Informazioni dal registro WAR-STENT.

BACKGROUND: In patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) with warfarin, the management of OAC peri-procedure of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still not fully defined. To investigate clinical practice and outcomes associated with continuation vs interruption of OAC, with or without bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), we examined the database of the observational, prospective, multicenter Italian WAR-STENT registry. METHODS: The WAR-STENT registry was conducted in 2008-2010 in 37 Italian centers and included 411 consecutive patients in 157 of whom the peri-procedural international normalized ratio (INR) value was available. In relation to the continuation vs interruption of OAC, patients were divided into group 1 (n = 106) and group 2 (n = 51) respectively, and compared. RESULTS: The basal characteristics of the two groups were similar. The most frequent indication for OAC was atrial fibrillation and for PCI acute coronary syndromes, respectively. The pre-procedural mean value of INR was significantly different in group 1 vs group 2 (2.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.2; p <0.001), while the use of antithrombotic drugs did not differ, except for LMWH which, albeit limited to only 14% of cases, was used significantly more frequently in group 2 (14% vs 2%; p=0.006). The radial approach was used significantly more often in group 1 vs group 2 (72% vs 45%; p=0.002). The in-hospital incidence of major bleeding complications was similar in groups 1 and 2 (4% vs 8%; p=0.27), as well as the occurrence of major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, re-revascularization of the treated vessel, stent thrombosis, stroke and venous thromboembolism (6% vs 6%; p=0.95). There was a tendency towards a higher incidence of minor access-site bleeding complications in group 1 patients treated by the femoral route. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients with an indication for OAC with warfarin and undergoing PCI, the continuation vs interruption of OAC (essentially without LMWH bridging) strategies appears similar in terms of efficacy and safety. In consideration of the superior convenience, peri-procedural continuation of OAC should therefore generally be preferred, with the possible exception of patients in whom the femoral approach is required for the procedure.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on coronary invasive procedures at two Italian high-volume referral centers.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to verify the impact on the number and characteristics of coronary invasive procedures for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of two hub centers with cardiac catheterization facilities, during the first month of lockdown following the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Procedural data of ACS patients admitted between 10 March and 10 April 2020 were compared with those of the same period of 2019. RESULTS: We observed a 23.4% reduction in ACS admissions during 2020, with a decrease for both ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (-5.6%) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (-34.5%), albeit not statistically significant (P = 0.2). During the first 15 days of the examined periods, the reduction in ACS admissions reached 52.5% (-25% for STEMI and -70.3% for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, P = 0.04). Among STEMI patients, the rate of those with a time delay from symptoms onset longer than 180 min was significantly higher during the lockdown period (P = 0.01). Radiograph exposure (P = 0.01) was higher in STEMI patients treated in 2020 with a slightly higher amount of contrast medium (P = 0.1) and number of stents implanted (P = 0.1), whereas the number of treated vessels was reduced (P = 0.03). Percutaneous coronary intervention procedural success and in-hospital mortality were not different between the two groups and in STEMI patients (P NS for all). CONCLUSION: During the early phase, the COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a lower rate of admissions for ACS, with a substantial impact on the time delay presentation of STEMI patients, but apparently without affecting the in-hospital outcomes.

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions for acute coronary syndrome: review of the literature and single-center experience]. / Impatto della pandemia COVID-19 sui ricoveri per sindrome coronarica acuta: revisione della letteratura ed esperienza monocentrica.

During the early phase of the lockdown following the COVID-19 pandemic, an alarm on the impact on cardiology admissions for cardiac causes, particularly in the field of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has emerged. In order to evaluate this trend, we analyzed the literature data published since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic to date, in addition to our intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) experience. This analysis showed (i) a reduction of the overall ICCU admissions up to 50%; (ii) a 40-50% reduction of ACS admissions, greater for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) than for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); (iii) a reduction greater than 50% of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary angioplasty; (iv) a higher time delay of STEMI; and (v) a higher number of ICCU admissions for non-primarily cardiac problems. In conclusion, the lockdown imposed due to the spread of COVID-19 infection has led to a change in the number and type of cardiology admissions. It seems therefore necessary that patients, especially for time-dependent diseases such as ACS, continue to refer to hospital care; that contemporary standard of care for acute cardiac disease should be guaranteed, and that intensivist cardiologists acquire specific skills for the treatment of patients with clinical conditions normally treated by other specialists.

Left main percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS or stable coronary artery disease: acute and long-term results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess in-hospital and long-term results of the novo unprotected left main (UPLM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD), in an unselected population admitted to a single high- volume cath-lab without on-site cardiac surgery. METHODS: From 2008 to 2011, among 317 PCI performed in patients with the novo UPLM stenosis, 49 patients presented ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 152 non ST-elevation MI/unstable angina (NSTEMI/UA), 116 stable CAD. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 20% in STEMI, 5.3% in NSTEMI/UA and 1.7% in stable CAD patients (P<0.001). Two-year total mortality was 24.5%, 25.6% and 6% in the 3 groups, and cardiac death was 20%, 13.8% and 3.4% (P=0.002). Left main target lesion revascularization (TLR) was similar in the 3 groups, as the clinically-driven TLR (10% vs. 11% vs. 7.7%, P=0.642), with neither definite nor probable stent thrombosis. Multivariate analysis showed the following independent predictors of 2-year mortality: bare-metal stent use (OR 4.53, P<0.001), Syntax Score >32 (OR 3.53, P=0.012), ACS as the indication (OR 3.24, P=0.012), peripheral artery disease (OR 2.20, P=0.042), and age >75 years (OR 2.09, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed acceptable results of UPLM PCI in STEMI patients, where short-term prognosis was related to hemodynamic conditions, good results in NSTEMI/UA patients where mortality increased in the follow-up due to comorbidities, and very good results in patients with stable CAD.

Coronary thrombus in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI: Prognostic significance and management.

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) usually results from coronary atherosclerotic plaque disruption with superimposed thrombus formation. Detection of coronary thrombi is a poor prognostic indicator, which is mostly proportional to their size and composition. Particularly, intracoronary thrombi impair both epicardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion, by occluding major coronary arteries and causing distal embolization, respectively. Thus, although primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred treatement strategy in STEMI setting, the associated use of adjunctive antithrombotic drugs and/or percutaneous thrombectomy is crucial to optimize therapy of STEMI patients, by improving either angiographical and clinical outcomes. This review article will focus on the prognostic significance of intracoronary thrombi and on current antithrombotic pharmacological and interventional strategies used in the setting of STEMI to manage thrombotic lesions.

Left ventricular support device for cardiogenic shock during myocardial infarction due to stent thrombosis: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis (ST) is a new, rare, cause of STEMI. Few data are available about incidence and clinical impact of shock complicating acute myocardial infarction due to ST (st-STEMI). METHODS: From January 2004 to March 2007, 92 st-STEMI patients were observed: 14 (15.2%) of them presented with cardiogenic shock and were evaluated in the present analysis. In particular, clinical and angiographic characteristics of survivors and non-survivors to PCI were compared. RESULTS: St-STEMI was related to left main or multivessels stent thrombosis in 35.7% of cases; whereas in 93% of cases st-STEMI occurred in a territory with previous myocardial infarction. All patients underwent IABP implantation immediately before coronary angiography, whereas Impella LP 2.5 pump was used in 21% of cases when persistent cardiac low-output signs were recorded. PCI was successful in 80% of cases. In-hospital survival was 28.6%. Death occurred within the first 48 h in the majority of patients. At six-months all patients survived to the acute phase were alive. Survivors had significantly lower thrombus grade after wire passage (p=0.03) and, albeit not significant, they showed a higher rate of very late ST, longer times from symptoms onset to revascularization, and higher TIMI flow grade either before and after PCI. CONCLUSION: The incidence of cardiogenic shock in st-STEMI is high, particulary it seems to be two times higher than the rate reported during myocardial infarction. One third of cases is related to left main or multiple vessels ST. Shock in st-STEMI represents a dramatic event with very low in-hospital and early survival.

Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of 718 patients: FAILS (Failure in Left Main Study).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to retrospectively appraise the incidence and management of restenosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected left main (ULM) disease. BACKGROUND: The promising role of DES for ULM has been reported. However, no detailed data are available on subsequent restenosis. METHODS: From the total sample of patients with ULM treated with DES, we identified those presenting with angiographic ULM restenosis. The primary end point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), that is, death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). We also adjudicated stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium. RESULTS: Post-DES restenosis in ULM occurred in 70 of 718 patients (9.7%). Of these, 59 (84.3%) were treated percutaneously (34 [48.6%] with additional DES, 22 [31.4%] with standard or cutting balloons, 2 [2.9%] with rotational atherectomy, and 1 [1.4%] with a bare-metal stent), whereas 7 (10%) patients underwent bypass surgery and 4 (5.7%) were treated medically. In-hospital MACE included no periprocedural MI and only 1 (1.4%) death. After 27.2 +/- 15.4 months, MACE occurred cumulatively in 18 (25.7%) patients, with death in 4 (5.7%), MI in 2 (2.9%), and TLR in 15 (21.4%). Patients treated with medical, interventional, and surgical therapy had the following MACE rates, respectively: 50%, 25.4%, and 14.3%. Definite, probable, and possible stent thrombosis occurred in 0 (0%), 1 (1.4%), and 1 (1.4%) patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DES restenosis in the ULM artery can be managed in most cases with a minimally invasive approach, achieving favorable early and late results.

Mechanisms of late stent malapposition after primary stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a subanalysis of the selection trial.

BACKGROUND: One of the major predictors of late stent malapposition (LSM) is primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction. However, mechanisms of LSM are still under debate. METHODS: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and enrolled in the SELECTION trial (38 patients in the paclitaxel-eluting stent, PES, and 35 in the bare metal stent, BMS, cohort) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate LSM, by means of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data recorded at the index and 7-month follow-up procedures. RESULTS: Stent malapposition was documented in 21 lesions in 21 patients (28.8%): in 8 of these 21 patients (38.1%) it was LSM. Although statistical significance was not reached, LSM was more frequent after PES than BMS implantation (15.8% vs. 5.7%). LSM was mainly located within the body of the stent (62.5% of the cases). At the LSM segment, a significant increase of vessel area (19.2 +/- 3.3 mm(2) vs. 21.9 +/- 5.3 mm(2), P = 0.04) and a reduction of plaque area (12.6 +/- 4.6 mm(2) vs. 9.1 +/- 3.9 mm(2), P = 0.04) were observed at IVUS between the index and follow-up procedure. CONCLUSIONS: After primary stenting for STEMI, LSM seems to be more frequent after PES rather than BMS implantation. In the STEMI setting, possible mechanisms leading to LSM include positive remodeling and plaque mass decrease.

Rheolytic thrombectomy in patients with massive and submassive acute pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: To appraise the impact of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) on angiographic and clinical endpoints in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute PE and hemodynamic compromise, based mainly on anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapies, is challenging and still suboptimal in many patients. In such a setting, mechanical removal of thrombus from pulmonary circulation holds the promise of significant clinical benefits, albeit remains under debate. METHODS: We retrospectively report on 51 patients referred to our catheterization laboratory and treated with AngioJet RT. Patients were classified according to the degree of hemodynamic compromise (shock, hypotension, and right ventricular dysfunction) to explore thoroughly the degree of angiographic pulmonary involvement (angiographic massive PE was defined as the presence of a Miller index >or= 17) and the impact on angiographic (obstruction, perfusion, and Miller indexes) and clinical (all-cause death, recurrence of PE, bleeding, renal failure, and severe thrombocytopenia) endpoints of AngioJet RT. RESULTS: Angiographic massive PE was present in all patients with shock, whereas patients with right ventricular dysfunction and hypotension showed a similar substantial pulmonary vascular bed involvement. Technical success was obtained in 92.2% of patients, with a significant improvement in obstruction, perfusion and Miller indexes in each subgroup (all P < 0.0001). Four patients reported major bleedings and eight (15.7%) died in-hospital. Laboratory experience was significantly associated to a lower rate of major bleedings. All survivors were alive at long-term follow-up (35.5 +/- 21.7 months) except three who expired due to cancer and acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands AngioJet RT can be operated safely and effectively in most patients with acute PE, either massive or submassive, and substantial involvement of pulmonary vascular bed.

Severe diffuse coronary artery spasm in the early phase of cardiogenic shock.

Coronary artery vasospasm rarely appears as a diffuse phenomenon that involves all the coronary tree. We present a clinical case of acute myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular fibrillation and cardiogenic shock. Urgent coronary angiography showed occlusion of proximal Circumflex coronary artery and a TIMI I flow in the left anterior descending artery due to severe, diffuse coronary vasospasm. Patient was successfully treated with intra-aortic balloon pump and intracoronary bolus of nitroglycerin with restoration of flow in left coronary branches and complete resolution of shock.

Comparison of primary angioplasty in rural and metropolitan areas within an integrated network.

AIMS: To compare reperfusion times and in-hospital outcome of patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a teaching hospital (TH) with or without inter-hospital transfer and in community hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 536 patients with STEMI treated between January 2005 and December 2006 with primary PCI. Three groups were identified. A: 207 patients presented to the TH. B: 121 patients transferred to TH from metropolitan area hospitals (MAH). C: 208 patients presented in two rural area hospitals (RAH) with primary PCI capability. Baseline characteristics were similar. Door-to-balloon (DtB) times were significantly (p<0.001) higher in group B (median 120, range 90-180 min) both compared to group A (median 60, range 45-90 min) and C (median 73, range 55-99 min). In group B 79,5% of patients present a DtB > 90 min. In-hospital mortality was 4.9%, 3.3% and 4.3% respectively in group A, B and C without significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The expansion of primary PCI to RAH achieves reperfusion delays similar to that of patients admitted to TH. Transferred patients present very higher DtB when compared to patients treated on-site. In-hospital outcome are similar but further studies are warranted.

[Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy with AngioJet for pulmonary embolism: methods and results in the experience of a high-volume center]. / Trombectomia reolitica percutanea con AngioJet nell'embolia polmonare: metodologia e risultati nell'esperienza di un centro ad alto volume.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is a common disease with significant mortality. Anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapies are a mainstay in the management of acute pulmonary embolism, especially with hemodynamic compromise. However, systemic drugs cannot achieve timely and effective treatment of acute pulmonary embolism in all patients. Recently, rheolytic thrombectomy has been proven to be effective in the treatment of massive thrombosis in vein grafts. The purpose of this study was to describe the rheolytic thrombectomy procedure and to evaluate the efficacy of thrombus removal using the AngioJet catheter in patients with acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (16 men, 14 women, mean age 67.9 +/- 13.5 years) with massive or submassive pulmonary embolism were treated with rheolytic thrombectomy. The Miller index and the systolic pulmonary pressure were evaluated pre- and post-rheolytic thrombectomy. In-hospital results were analyzed according to the learning curve of operators. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 93.3% of patients. Eleven patients received adjunctive loco-regional thrombolytic agent (alteplase) or abciximab. A significant improvement in the obstruction, perfusion and Miller indexes and in the systolic pulmonary pressure was observed after rheolytic thrombectomy (p <0.0001) in all patients. The achievement of a larger experience by the operators was associated with a less procedural complication rate (i.e. post-procedural increase in creatinine, cardiac arrest during the procedure, post-procedural hemoptysis, and in-hospital mortality). Total in-hospital mortality occurred in 5 patients (16.7%), 60% of them presented with cardiogenic shock. All patients were alive at the 12-month follow-up, except one who died after 3 months for myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy using the AngioJet catheter may be a valid treatment option for patients with massive or submassive pulmonary embolism with rapid and significant hemodynamic improvement and encouraging results at early and long-term follow-up. Greater laboratory and operator experience yield better clinical results.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to early and late stent thrombosis a new group of high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical and angiographic outcomes between patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to stent thrombosis (ST) and de novo coronary thrombosis. BACKGROUND: There are limited data for procedural and mid-term outcomes of patients with ST presenting with STEMI. METHODS: From January 2004 to March 2007, 115 definite ST patients were observed: 92 (80%) of them presented as STEMI and were compared with a consecutive group of 98 patients with de novo STEMI. All patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary end points were successful angiographic reperfusion and distal embolization. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), evaluated at 6-month follow-up, were defined as death, nonfatal myocardial reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident. RESULTS: Successful reperfusion rate was lower in patients with ST (p < 0.0001), whereas distal embolization rate was higher (p = 0.01) in comparison with patients with de novo STEMI. Stent thrombosis proved to be an independent predictor of unsuccessful reperfusion at propensity-adjusted binary logistic regression (odds ratio 6.8, p = 0.004). In-hospital MACCE rate was higher in patients with ST (p = 0.003), whereas no differences were observed at 6-month follow-up among hospital survivors between the 2 groups (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Stent thrombosis identifies a subgroup of patients with STEMI with poor angiographic and early clinical outcomes, suggesting that the management of these patients should be improved.

Early and long-term clinical results of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapies are a mainstay in the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), especially when hemodynamic compromise is present. However, systemic drugs cannot achieve timely and effective treatment of acute PE in all patients. In such a setting, mechanical removal of thrombus from the pulmonary circulation holds the promise of significant clinical benefits, although it remains untested. We report early and long-term outcome of patients with massive or submassive acute PE treated with rheolytic thrombectomy by means of the 6Fr Xpeedior AngioJet device at our institution. Three main groups were defined pre hoc: subjects with severe (i.e., shock), moderate, or mild hemodynamic compromise. Technical and procedural successes, obstruction, perfusion and Miller indexes, and clinical events were appraised. In total 25 patients were treated with thrombectomy (8 in severe, 12 in moderate, and 5 in mild hemodynamic compromise). Technical and procedural successes were obtained in all patients, as confirmed by the significant improvement in obstruction, perfusion and Miller indexes overall, and in each subgroup (all p values <0.001). Improvement in obstruction, perfusion, and Miller indexes at the end of the procedure could also be confirmed in patients (n = 8) treated with local fibrinolysis and in the absence of concomitant thrombolysis (n = 17, p <0.05). Four patients died in hospital, all other patients but 1 were safely discharged after an appropriate hospital stay, and all were alive at long-term follow-up (median 61 months). In conclusion, this study supports at early and long-term follow-up the effectiveness and safety of rheolytic thrombectomy for PE.

[Percutaneous treatment of anomalous left anterior descending coronary artery with double catheter technique and direct stenting: a case report]. / Trattamento percutaneo dell'arteria interventricolare anteriore ostiale ad origine anomala mediante tecnica del doppio catetere e stenting diretto: un caso clinico.

We report the case of a patient with absence of the left main coronary artery associated with close origin of the left coronary branches and a subocclusive proximal lesion of the left anterior descending coronary artery involving the ostium. Two guiding catheters were used for selective cannulation of the separated ostium and wiring of both branches was obtained. This approach allowed us to recognize the optimal stent position and then to correctly deploy it on the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. The absence of the left main coronary artery is a relatively rare finding and experiences concerning ostial stenting in patients with anomalous origin of the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries are limited. In this case report we suggest and discuss about a new procedure that allows the treatment of such condition by direct stenting.

Outlook of drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main disease: insights on long-term clinical predictors.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly employed to treat unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis, with variable success. This strategy has been applied to patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected LMCA stenosis. METHODS: From April 2003 to June 2006, 114 consecutive patients with de novo unprotected LMCA stenosis underwent PCI with DES, and were followed over a mean period of 17.1 +/- 9.1 months. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI] or target lesion revascularization [TLR]). RESULTS: LMCA stenting was successfully performed in all patients. In-hospital mortality was 3.5%, with no in-hospital non-fatal MI or emergency coronary artery bypass grafts. During the follow-up period, the all-cause mortality rate was 7.9%, with 3.5% cardiac-related deaths. TLR was performed in 7.9% of patients, and the MACE rate was 14.9%. All non-surviving patients were at high surgical risk (EuroSCORE > 6) and had a significantly higher EuroSCORE than surviving patients that patients with a EuroSCORE < or = 11 had significantly improved survival rates over those with a EuroSCORE > 11 (p < 0.0001). Moreover, most of the patients who died of cardiac causes were diabetic (71.4% vs. 26.6%; p < 0.05). Acute coronary syndromes, as clinical presentation, and non-ostial LMCA disease were also significantly more common within non-surviving patients (100% vs. 67%; p < 0.05, and 92.3% vs. 66.3%; p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Stenting of unprotected LMCA appears to be associated with a favorable mid-term outlook, especially in selected patients.