Plantar pressure distribution in a hyperpronated foot before and after intervention with an extraosseous talotarsal stabilization device-a retrospective study.

Plantar pressure measurements have long been used by clinicians to provide information regarding potential impairments and disorders of the foot and ankle. Elevations in peak plantar pressures or a poor distribution of these pressures can be an indication of pathomechanics in the foot. Lower extremity deficits such as sensory impairment, foot deformities, limited joint mobility, and reduced plantar tissue thickness have been associated with high plantar pressures. The total pressures, pressure distribution, and peak pressures provide useful information to evaluate the abnormal functioning of the talotarsal joint. Instability of the talotarsal joint can result in excessive forces exerted on the joints and surrounding tissues in the foot that can then lead to dysfunction of the proximal musculoskeletal kinetic chain. In the present study, we performed a retrograde analysis of the pre- and postoperative measurements of the peak plantar pressures, peak forces, and area of contact between the foot and the ground during each phase of the gait cycle for 6 patients (12 feet) who had undergone a bilateral extraosseous talotarsal stabilization procedure using a type II extraosseous talotarsal stabilization device. After the procedure, a significant reduction was seen in the peak pressures (42%) over the entire foot and a significant increase in the contact area (19.7%) between the foot and the floor. This could imply that the extraosseous talotarsal stabilization procedure was effective in stabilizing the talotarsal joint complex, thus eliminating abnormal hindfoot motion and restoring the normal biomechanics of the foot and ankle complex, as indicated by a reduction and realignment of the peak plantar pressures and forces.

Extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using HyProCure®: preliminary clinical outcomes of a prospective case series.

The present multicenter, prospective study evaluated the subjective outcomes in patients after extraosseous talotarsal stabilization using the HyProCure(®) stent as a standalone procedure for the treatment of recurrent and/or partial talotarsal joint dislocation (RTTD) in a population of pediatric and adult patients. RTTD has been cited as a possible etiology for a number of foot ailments and might contribute to the development of pathologic features localized more proximally in the weightbearing musculoskeletal chain. Correction of RTTD might, therefore, lead to the reduction of pathologic features associated with this deformity. A total of 46 feet in 35 patients were included in the present investigation. Subjective evaluation used the Maryland Foot Score assessment, which was obtained preoperatively and 1, 2, and 3 weeks, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The mean overall scores improved from a preoperative value of 69.53 ± 19.56 to a postoperative value of 89.17 ± 14.41 at the 1-year follow-up. Foot pain decreased by 36.97%, foot functional activities improved by 14.39%, and foot appearance improved by 29.49%. The greatest magnitude of improvement occurred 4 weeks postoperatively, with gradual improvement continuing through to the 1-year follow-up. Implants were removed from 2 patients (2 feet, 4.35%). No unresolved complications were observed. The positive subjective outcomes resulting from the extraosseous talotarsal stabilization procedure suggest that the intervention employing the device we have described alleviates pain and improves foot function and appearance in patients with RTTD.

The effects of ultrasonic and electrosurgery devices on nerve physiology.

BACKGROUND: While the risks associated with the use of electrosurgery near nerves are well known, few studies have examined the neurophysiologic effects of application of the Harmonic Blade, an ultrasonic scalpel, in the vicinity of nerve fibres. This study sought to compare the sub-acute neurophysiologic effects of the Harmonic Blade and electrosurgery after incisions close to the sciatic nerve. METHODS: Incisions were made in rats with the Harmonic Blade and electrosurgery at distances of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm from the sciatic nerve. Sham surgery was also performed. The compound action potential, conduction velocity and calibrated nylon filament (von Frey hair, VFH) stimulating force were monitored for up to 3 hours after surgery. The sciatic nerve was assessed for inflammation via H&E staining and impaired axonal transport by ß-APP immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Electrosurgery incisions produced a significantly greater decrease in compound action potential and conduction velocity, and increase in the VFH force than the Harmonic Blade over all time points and distances from the sciatic nerve. The Harmonic Blade was similar to sham surgery for the compound action potential and VFH force. Electrosurgery yielded significantly greater leukocyte infiltration than the Harmonic Blade and produced the highest levels of ß-APP immunoreactive swellings. CONCLUSIONS: Incisions with electrosurgery in the range of 1-4 mm of the sciatic nerve caused substantial changes in neurophysiologic functioning and inflammation. In contrast, the Harmonic Blade was similar to sham surgery in the vicinity of the nerve, producing little observable acute trauma.