Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Phys Act Health ; 13(10): 1035-1041, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27172619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health-related fitness (HRF) and motor coordination (MC) can be influenced by children's environment and lifestyle behavior. This study evaluates the association between living environment and HRF, MC, and physical and sedentary activities of children in Suriname. METHODS: Tests were performed for HRF (morphological, muscular, and cardiorespiratory component), gross MC (Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder), fine MC (Movement Assessment Battery for Children), and self-reported activities in 79 urban and 77 rural 7-year-old Maroon children. Urban-rural differences were calculated by an independent sample t test (Mann-Whitney U test if not normally distributed) and χ2 test. RESULTS: No difference was found in body mass index, muscle strength, and the overall score of gross and fine MC. However, urban children scored lower in HRF on the cardiorespiratory component (P ≤ .001), in gross MC on walking backward (P = .014), and jumping sideways (P = 0.011). They scored higher in the gross MC component moving sideways (P ≤ .001) and lower in fine MC on the trail test (P = .036) and reported significantly more sedentary and fewer physical activities than rural children. CONCLUSIONS: Living environment was associated with certain components of HRF, MC, and physical and sedentary activities of 7-year-old children in Suriname. Further research is needed to evaluate the development of urban children to provide information for possible intervention and prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Exercise/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Physical Fitness/physiology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Sedentary Behavior , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Body Mass Index , Cardiorespiratory Fitness/physiology , Child , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Sports , Suriname
2.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 27(8): 793-800, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22583906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Following shoulder arthroplasty, any well-planned rehabilitation program should include muscle strengthening. However, it is not always clear how different external loads influence shoulder kinematics in patients with shoulder prostheses. The objective of this study was to describe shoulder kinematics and determine the contribution of the scapulothoracic joint to total shoulder motion of patients with total and reverse shoulder arthroplasties and of healthy individuals during rehabilitation exercises (anteflexion and elevation in the scapular plane) using different loading conditions (without external load, 1 kg and elastic resistance). METHODS: Shoulder motions were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device. A force transducer was used to record force signals during loaded conditions using elastic resistance. Statistical comparisons were made using a three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post hoc testing. FINDINGS: The scapula contributed more to movement of the arm in subjects with prostheses compared to healthy subjects. The same applies for loaded conditions (1 kg and elastic resistance) relative to unloaded tasks. For scapular internal rotation, upward rotation and posterior tilt no significant differences among groups were found during both exercises. Glenohumeral elevation angles during anteflexion were significantly higher in the total shoulder arthroplasty group compared to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group. INTERPRETATION: Differences in contribution of the scapula to total shoulder motion between patients with different types of arthroplasties were not significant. However, compared to healthy subjects, they were. Furthermore, scapular kinematics of patients with shoulder arthroplasty was influenced by implementation of external loads, but not by the type of load.


Subject(s)
Joint Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis/rehabilitation , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Shoulder/surgery , Adult , Aged , Anthropometry , Arthroplasty , Biomechanical Phenomena , Elasticity , Humans , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Rotation , Scapula/anatomy & histology , Scapula/surgery , Shoulder/anatomy & histology , Shoulder Injuries , Stress, Mechanical , Tensile Strength
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL