Treatment of Brain Tumors in Thailand from 2005 to 2014: Data from the National Health Security Office.

Objective: To evaluate the treatment of brain tumor in Thailand. Conclusion: The treatment of brain tumors in Thailand is developed throughout the country, with better outcomes, shorter lengths of stay. The health region 1, 7, 12 and 13 have a very high ability to treat brain tumors in their areas. Material and Method: The data from the National Health Security Office (NHSO) concerning the principle diagnosis of brain tumors between 2005 and 2014 were retrieved and analyzed for their treatment. Results: Between 2005 and 2014, there were a total of 93,810 hospital admissions in Thailand for brain tumor treatment. The number of brain tumors had increased each year (from 6,056 in 2005 to 12,098 in 2014) but the length of stay (LOS) had been shorter (from 13.28 in 2005 to 9.94 days in 2014). The adjusted relative weight had increased from 2.946 to 4.383, respectively. The number of poor outcomes had also decreased from 23.7% in 2005 to 18.1% in 2014. Above 80% of total admissions, the treatment was performed within the health region, namely region 1, 7, 12 and 13 which had very high treatment rates within the region. Conclusion: The treatment of brain tumors in Thailand is developed throughout the country, with better outcomes, shorter lengths of stay. The health region 1, 7, 12 and 13 have a very high ability to treat brain tumors in their areas.

Long term outcomes of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated with radiation - Siriraj Hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate treatment outcomes of patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 166 endometrial cancer patients, undergoing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy at Siriraj Hospital from 2005-2008 was performed. Pathology was reviewed. Results of treatment were reported with 5-year loco-regional recurrence free survival (LRRFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), patterns of failure and toxicity, and according to stage and risk groups. RESULTS: Median follow up time was 62.8 months. Pathological changes were found in 36.3% of the patients after central reviews, leading to 19% changes in risk groups. Most of the patients (83.7%) received pelvic radiation (PRT) and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). Five-year LRRFS and OS of all patients were 94.9% and 85.5%, respectively. There was no recurrence or death in low and low-intermediate risk groups. For the high-intermediate risk group, 5-year LRRFS and OS were 96.2% and 90.8%, respectively, and for the high risk group 90.5% and 71%. Late grade 3 and 5 gastrointestinal toxicity was found in 3% and 1.2% of patients, respectively. All of them received PRT 5,000 cGy in 25 fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Low and intermediate risk patients had good results with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. For high risk patients, postoperative radiation therapy alone appeared to be inadequate as the most common pattern of failure was distant metastasis.

A phase II study of the combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin as the neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Although anthracycline-based regimen is standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), there is some concern over its toxicities such as alopecia and cardiotoxicity. Gemcitabine is another active agent in metastatic breast cancer after failure to anthracycline with less toxicity. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin as NAC in LABC. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients with histologically confirmed LABC (T3, T4 or N2 and M0) were included. Patients were scheduled to receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 D1, D8 and carboplatin AUC x 5 D1) every 21 days. Patients with clinical response underwent surgery and additional 3 cycles of adjuvant GC. Primary endpoint was clinical response rate whereas secondary endpoints included pathological response, DFS, OS and toxicity. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2007, 40 LABC patients were enrolled. Of 40 patients, 35 were evaluable for efficacy and 40 for toxicity. Twenty-three out of 35 patients (65%) obtained cPR. Among 22 patients who had clinical response and who underwent surgery, overall pathological response rate was 51.5% with 1-pCR (2.9%) and 17-pPR (48.5%). All 7 triple-negative patients had pathological response (1-pCR, 6-pPR). At median follow-up of 59 months, median DFS and OS were not reached. Five-year OS and DFS were 67% and 62%, respectively Major adverse effect was myelosuppression without fatal complications. CONCLUSION: The combination GC was feasible and well-tolerated for LABC in neoadjuvant setting. Triple-negative subgroup seems to have high response to GC.

Preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer with capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of preoperative chemoradiation with high dose Capecitabine. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Fifteen patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer were treated with Capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day, orally 7 days/week concurrent with whole pelvic irradiation 45 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks. Patients underwent surgery in the following 4-6 weeks. RESULTS: After complete treatment, 11 patients (73%) underwent surgery. Ten patients (66%) had sphincter preservative surgery; three of them had primary tumors located in the lower rectum. Five patients had grade 2 and one patient had grade 3 diarrhea. No grade 4 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: Preoperative Capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day concurrent with whole pelvic irradiation were effective and well tolerated The potential dose limiting toxicity effect was the diarrhea.

A randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE: Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. This study was a preliminary result of a randomized two arms, prospective, open-label phase III trial comparing the activity and safety of the concurrent chemoradiation of Tegafur-Uracil and carboplatin or carboplatin alone in locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer patients were randomized to have Tegafur-Uracil 225 mg/m(2)/day orally, 5 days a week and carboplatin 100 mg/m(2) IV over 30-60 min, weekly on day 1 concurrent with standard radiotherapy (Group A) or carboplatin alone concurrent with standard radiotherapy (Group B). RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were randomized to Group A (n=234) or Group B (n=235). The tumor response at 3-month follow-up time showed no significant difference. The only prognostic factor to improve the complete response rate was the hemoglobin level. The patients in Group A, who had Hb <10 gm/dL had the relatively better change to complete response of 1.48 compared to that in Group B (P 0.025, 95% CI 1.07, 2.04). No severe toxicity or adverse event had been reported. The median follow-up time for Group A and Group B was 12.6 and 11.8 months, respectively. There was no statistical difference in PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation by Tegafur-Uracil and carboplatin showed no difference in tumor response rate or treatment toxicity compared to carboplatin alone. The combination drugs might have benefit in poor prognostic patients such as the baseline Hb <10 gm/dL.

A phase II study to evaluate WF10 in patients with late hemorrhagic radiation cystitis and proctitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of WF10 (TCDO iv solution) therapy in patients with late hemorrhagic radiation cystitis and proctitis in a long-term follow up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From February 1999 to July 2001, 30 symptomatic patients with endoscopically confirmed grade 2 and 3 late hemorrhagic cystitis (n = 16) and proctitis (n = 14) were treated with WF10. The dose was 0.5 ml/kg BW, diluted in 250 ml 5%D/W, administered by intravenous infusion over 2 h, 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks for 2-4 cycles, combined with standard therapy. The patients were clinically followed up every 3 weeks for 3 months, then every 3 months for 1 year and then every 3-6 months. The study endpoints were immediate response with improvement to Grade 0-1 within 3 months and the incidence of recurrence to Grade > or =2 during the follow up time. RESULTS: After completion of the WF10 therapy, 14 cystitis patients (88%) had improved to grade 0-1 hematuria, and 14 proctitis patients (100%) had improved in bleeding per rectum to grade 0-1 within 3 months. The median follow up time was 51 months. During the follow up period, among the responders, 4 cystitis patients (28%) had recurrent hematuria of grade 2 and two proctitis patients (14%) had recurrent bleeding per rectum of grade 2 and 3. No treatment toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: The WF10 therapy combined with conventional treatment is simple and safe with long-term efficacy in the treatment of late hemorrhagic radiation cystitis and proctitis.

Effect of Amifostine to prevent radiotherapy-induced acute and late toxicity in head and neck cancer patients who had normal or mild impaired salivary gland function.

BACKGROUND: Amifostine has a potential role for salivary gland protection in head and neck cancer patients who had radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty-seven head and neck cancer patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus Amifostine. The efficacy of the treatment was determined by a questionnaire evaluating dryness of mouth and the oral comfort, the RTOG/EORTC acute/late radiation morbidity scoring criteria, collection of the whole saliva and the 99mTc-pertecnetate scintigraphy of the salivary glands. RESULTS: Amifostine significantly reduced the mean questionnaire scores from 6.49 to 3.73, the incidence of grade > or = 2 mucositis from 75% to 36% and acute xerostomia from 82% to 39%. The salivary gland function returned to normal at a rate of 36.3% in the Amifostine group versus 9.1% in the control group. CONCLUSION: Amifostine is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of acute mucositis, acute and late xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients.

Preoperative capecitabine with pelvic radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (phase I trial).

OBJECTIVE: Phase I multicenter study defined the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and safety profile of capecitabine in combination with preoperative radiation for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients were treated with oral capecitabine (700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100 and 1200 mg/m2 twice daily continuously) plus preoperative whole pelvic irradiation (45-46 Gy in 23-25 fractions over 5-6 weeks). Surgery was performed at the median of 42 days after chemoradiation treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were in this trial. Eighteen patients (3 per dose level) had received capecitabine from 700 mg/m2 twice daily to the highest dose level of 1200 mg/m2 twice daily. There were no grade 3/4 DLTs during dose escalation, a further nine patients were included at the highest capecitabine dose. Two of the twelve patients (16%) receiving capecitabine 1200 mg/m2 twice daily developed grade 3 diarrhea and discontinued treatment. There were no other grade 3/4 adverse events. After capecitabine chemoradiation, 24 of 27 patients (89%) received definite surgery. Primary and lymph node down staging occurred in ten patients (42%). Sphincter-sparing surgery was performed in seven patients (26%) and abdominal-perineal resection was performed in 17 patients (63%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative capecitabine chemoradiation based on continuous daily capecitabine is very well tolerated in patients with LARC. The authors did not reach the MTD in the present study.

Reduced recurrence of late hemorrhagic radiation cystitis by WF10 therapy in cervical cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, two-arm, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of WF10 as adjunct to standard treatment in the management of late hemorrhagic radiation cystitis compared to standard treatment alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cervical cancer patients with Grade 2 or 3 late hemorrhagic radiation cystitis, were randomized and treated with WF10 0.5 ml/kg body weight, diluted in physiological saline or 5% dextrose water 250 ml, intravenous infusions over 2 h on 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles plus standard treatment (WF10 group) or standard treatment alone (control group). Fifty patients in each group were evaluated by questioning; urinalysis and cystoscopy during a 1 year follow up. RESULTS: At week 7, 37 patients (74%) in the WF10 group and 32 patients (64%) in the control group showed complete resolution in objective hematuria (P = 0.28). Significantly lower use of antibiotics (P = 0.002) and antispasmodics (P < 0.001) was found in the WF10 group. Among the responders, 24 patients (77%) in the control group experienced recurrent objective hematuria, whereas in the WF10 group only 17 patients (47%) experienced a recurrence (P = 0.01). Recurrence of objective hematuria occurred significantly faster in the control group as evidenced by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank statistics (P = 0.004), suggesting a long-term effect of WF10. Cystoscopy, at the end of the treatment period and after the one year follow up showed overall improvement without significant difference between two groups. No severe toxicity was monitored. CONCLUSIONS: WF10 therapy is a safe, non-invasive and convenient method in the management of late hemorrhagic radiation cystitis. WF10 therapy, as adjunct to standard treatment, has significantly reduced recurrence of objective hematuria, compared to standard treatment alone, during a one year follow up.