The Interplay Between Trait Resilience and Coping Self-efficacy in Patients with Breast Cancer: An International Study.

The role of self-efficacy to cope with breast cancer as a mediator and/or moderator in the relationship of trait resilience to quality of life and psychological symptoms was examined in this study. Data from the BOUNCE Project ( https://www.bounce-project.eu/ ) were used. Women diagnosed with and in treatment for breast cancer (N = 484), from four countries, participated in the study. Trait resilience and coping self-efficacy were assessed at baseline (soon after the beginning of systemic treatment), and outcomes (quality of life, psychological symptoms) 3 months later. Hierarchical regression, mediation, moderation, and conditional (moderated) mediation and moderation analyses were performed to examine the study hypotheses. Coping self-efficacy mediated the impact of trait resilience. In addition, higher levels of resilience in combination with higher levels of coping self-efficacy were associated with better outcomes. Country of origin had no impact on these results. Overall, it seems that coping self-efficacy is a key factor that should be taken into account for research and intervention efforts in cancer.

Five-year follow-up results of aerobic and impact training on bone mineral density in early breast cancer patients.

A 12-month exercise program reversibly prevented hip bone loss in premenopausal women with early breast cancer. The bone-protective effect was maintained for 2 years after the end of the program but was lost thereafter. PURPOSE: Breast cancer survivors are at an increased risk for osteoporosis and fracture. This 5-year follow-up of a randomized impact exercise intervention trial evaluated the maintenance of training effects on bone among breast cancer patients. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-three early breast cancer patients aged 35-68 years and treated with adjuvant therapy were allocated into a 12-month exercise program or a control group. Four hundred forty-four patients (77%) were included in the 5-year analysis. The exercise intervention comprised weekly supervised step aerobics, circuit exercises, and home training. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Physical activity was estimated in metabolic equivalent (MET) hours per week and physical performance assessed by 2-km walking and figure-8 running tests. RESULTS: In premenopausal patients, the 12-month exercise program maintained femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) aBMD for 3 years, but the protective effect was lost thereafter. The mean FN aBMD change in the exercise and control groups was - 0.2% and - 1.5% 1 year, - 1.1% and - 2.1% 3 years and - 3.3% versus - 2.4% 5 years after the beginning of the intervention, respectively. Lumbar spine (LS) bone loss was not prevented in premenopausal women and no training effects on aBMD were seen in postmenopausal women. The main confounding element of the study was the unexpected rise in physical activity among patients in the control group. The physical performance improved among premenopausal women in the exercise group compared with the controls. CONCLUSION: The 12-month exercise program prevented FN and TH bone loss in premenopausal breast cancer patients for 3 years. The bone-protective effect was reversible and lost thereafter.

Effect of supervised and home exercise training on bone mineral density among breast cancer patients. A 12-month randomised controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: The ability of combined step aerobic- and circuit-training to prevent bone loss after breast cancer treatments was related to skeletal site and patients' menopausal status. Among premenopausal breast cancer survivors, a 12-month exercise intervention completely prevented bone loss at the femoral neck, whereas no exercise effect was seen at lumbar spine or at neither site in postmenopausal women. INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this randomised clinical trial was to determine the preventive effect of supervised weight-bearing jumping exercises and circuit training on bone loss among breast cancer patients. METHODS: Of 573 breast cancer survivors aged 35-68 years randomly allocated into exercise or control group after adjuvant treatments, 498 (87%) were included in the final analysis. The 12-month exercise intervention comprised weekly supervised step aerobic- and circuit-exercises and similar home training. Bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Physical performance was assessed by 2-km walking and figure-8 running tests, and the amount of physical activity was estimated in metabolic equivalent-hours/week. RESULTS: In premenopausal women, bone loss at the femoral neck was prevented by exercise, the mean BMD changes being -0.2% among the trainees vs. -1.4% among the controls (p = 0.01). Lumbar bone loss could not be prevented (-1.9% vs. -2.2%). In postmenopausal women, no significant exercise-effect on BMD was found either at the lumbar spine (-1.6% vs. -2.1%) or femoral neck (-1.1% vs. -1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This 12-month aerobic jumping and circuit training intervention completely prevented femoral neck bone loss in premenopausal breast cancer patients, whereas no effect on BMD was seen in postmenopausal women.

Quality of life and physical performance and activity of breast cancer patients after adjuvant treatments.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed at investigating the quality of life (QoL) and physical performance and activity, and their interrelations, in Finnish female breast cancer patients shortly after adjuvant treatments. METHODS: A total of 537 disease-free breast cancer survivors aged 35-68 years were surveyed at the beginning of a one year randomized exercise intervention. The patients were interviewed using EORTC QLQ-C30, FACIT-F, RBDI, and WHQ (for vasomotor symptoms) questionnaires. Physical performance was tested by a 2 km walking test. Physical activity was measured by a questionnaire and a prospective two-week diary. Multivariate analysis was used to study the factors associated with QoL. RESULTS: About 26% of the patients were rated as depressed, 20.4% as fatigued, and 82% suffered from menopausal symptoms. The global QoL was lower than in general population (69.4 vs 74.7, p<0.001). About 62% of the walking test results were below the population average. Fatigue (p<0.001), depression (p<0.001), body mass index (p = 0.016) and comorbidity (p = 0.032) impaired, and physical activity (p = 0.003) improved QoL. Physical activity level correlated positively to physical performance (r = -0.274, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The QoL of the patients shortly after adjuvant treatments was impaired and the physical performance poor as compared to general population. In particular, depression and fatigue were related to impaired QoL. Physical performance and activity level were the only factors that correlated positively to QoL. Thus, physical exercise could be useful in rehabilitation of cancer survivors, especially for depressed and fatigued patients.

Three-year oral clodronate treatment does not impair mineralization of newly formed bone--a histomorphometric study.

Bisphosphonates have been used successfully in the treatment of malignant hypercalcemia and skeletal metastases. Recently, clodronate has been studied in adjuvant settings in primary breast cancer. However, long-term effect of adjuvant clodronate on bone histology has not been reported, whereas bone mineral density studies have been published. The aim of this study was to examine the effect and safety of long-term clodronate treatment on bone quality as measured by histomorphometric techniques from bone biopsies. A total of 299 patients with early stage breast cancer were randomized to receive adjuvant oral clodronate (1.6 g/day) or to a control group for 3 years. All patients had adjuvant treatment: premenopausal women had six cycles of chemotherapy and postmenopausal women had antiestrogen for 3 years. Trabecular bone quality was examined in transiliac bone biopsy specimens by using histomorphometric techniques in 28 clodronate treated and 35 control patients who were disease-free at 3 years and who allowed the biopsy specimen to be obtained. No statistically significant differences were found in the values of osteoid, mineral apposition rate, or mineralization lag time in bone biopsies between the clodronate and the control groups. Postmenopausal women who received two antiresorptive drugs, antiestrogen and clodronate, developed features of secondary hyperparathyroidism with increased eroded surface and osteoclast number. In premenopausal, women clodronate with adjuvant chemotherapy, which induced early menopause and rapid bone loss in most of the patients, seemed to conduct slight depression in bone formation. Three-year oral clodronate treatment does not impair mineralization of newly formed bone: however, clodronate with different adjuvant breast cancer treatments has a diverse impact on bone histomorphometry depending on the type of therapy.

Clodronate treatment influences MMP-2 associated outcome in node positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Serum postoperative matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) level is a predictor of outcome in node positive breast cancer and can be used to stratify patients into low and high risk groups. Our aim was to determine how clodronate treatment influences MMP-2 associated clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with primary node-positive breast cancer were randomized to control group or to receive oral clodronate for 3 years. Adjuvant chemo- or endocrine therapy was given to all patients. The follow-up time for all patients was 5 years. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were quantitatively measured from the serum of 252 patients before and after 1 year clodronate treatment using enzyme-linked immunoassays. RESULTS: In clodronate-treated patients, postoperative MMP-2 levels did not predict 5-year disease-free survival or overall survival (DFS, in low MMP-2 group (<5.32 ng/ml, median) 53% versus in high MMP-2 group (>median) 63%, p=NS; OS, 68% versus 63%, p=NS). When the patients were grouped according to serum MMP-2 levels, survival rates among patients with low MMP-levels were better in control than clodronate treated patients (DFS, 82% versus 53%, p = 0.003; OS, 91% versus 68%, p=0.014). Among patients with high serum MMP-2 levels, no significant difference in DFS or OS was found between control and clodronate groups. In multivariate analysis of low risk patients, independent predictors for DFS were treatment, age, nodal and PgR status, and those for OS treatment together with nodal and ER status. During 12 months follow-up, MMP-2 levels increased significantly more in clodonate receiving patients than in controls (p = 0.002). In comparison, when the patients were grouped according to MMP-9 levels, clodronate also impaired DFS among patients with low MMP-9 levels (82% versus 53%, p = 0.02), but no influence on OS was observed (83% versus 70%, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Clodronate interferes with the prognostic value of serum MMP-2. Clodronate has a negative impact on outcome among patients with low serum MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels, while no such influence is observed among patients with high MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels.

Tamoxifen treatment reverses the adverse effects of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure on serum lipids.

In all, 146 premenopausal women with early stage breast cancer were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, 5-year tamoxifen treatment was started after chemotherapy to those 112 patients with hormone-receptor-positive tumours while those with hormone-receptor-negative tumours received no further therapy. The serum lipid levels were followed in both groups. The levels of serum total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol increased significantly after chemotherapy only in patients who developed ovarian dysfunction. Total cholesterol increased +9.5% and LDL cholesterol +16.6% in patients who developed amenorrhoea (P<0.00001 and 0.00001, respectively). The cholesterol levels did not change in patients who preserved regular menstruation after chemotherapy. After 6 months of tamoxifen therapy, the total cholesterol decreased -9.7% and the LDL cholesterol -16.7% from levels after the chemotherapy, while the cholesterol concentrations remained at increased levels in the control group (P=0.001 and P<0.0001, respectively). The high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels did not change significantly in either tamoxifen or control group. The effects of tamoxifen treatment on serum lipids after chemotherapy have not been studied before. Our current study suggests that adjuvant tamoxifen therapy reverses the adverse effects of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure on total and LDL cholesterol and even lowers their serum levels below the baseline.

Long-term impact of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure on bone mineral density (BMD) in premenopausal breast cancer patients. The effect of adjuvant clodronate treatment.

We present the 5-year results of the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and the efficacy of clodronate in the prevention of bone loss in 73 premenopausal women with primary breast cancer. All patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy. The patients were randomised to oral clodronate 1600 mg daily for 3 years or to a control group. At 5 years, patients were divided into those with preserved menstruation and those with amenorrhoea. Changes in BMD correlated significantly with the menstrual function after chemotherapy. The change in the lumbar spine BMD at 3 and 5 years were +0.6 and -1.3% in the menstruating group and -7.5 and -10.4% in the amenorrhoeic group (P=0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively), and in femoral neck +1.7 and -0.3%, and -3.5 and -5.8% (P=0.002 and P=0.001, respectively). Three-year clodronate treatment significantly reduced the bone loss in the lumbar spine -3.0% compared with controls -7.4% at three years (P=0.003), but no significant difference was found in the femoral neck: -1.7% versus -2.8%, respectively (P=0.86). These differences between the study groups were still seen at 5 years: in the lumbar spine -5.8% versus -9.7% (P=0.008) and femoral neck -3.5% versus -5.1% (P=0.91). In conclusion, chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure in premenopausal women caused a temporary accelerated bone loss of the lumbar spine. Adjuvant clodronate treatment significantly reduced this bone loss. Two years after the termination of treatment, the bone loss was still significantly less in the clodronate group compared with the control group.

The effect of clodronate and antioestrogens on bone loss associated with oestrogen withdrawal in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

In this study we report bone mineral density (BMD) changes during clodronate and antioestrogen treatment in women with breast cancer having discontinued hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at the time of operation compared to women who had not used HRT immediately before the operation. 61 postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer were treated with the adjuvant antioestrogen tamoxifen 20 mg or toremifene 60 mg daily for 3 years. All patients were randomized to clodronate (1.6 g daily orally) or control groups for 3 years. 23 patients had recently (recent users) and 38 never or not for at least 1 year before operation used HRT (non-users). BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured before antiresorptive therapy (antioestrogens and clodronate) and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years thereafter. All patients were disease-free at the time of BMD measurements. Patients who had recently used HRT had more significant bone loss as compared to HRT non-users at 3 years in lumbar spine - 3.0% vs. + 1.2% (P< 0.001), but not in femoral neck - 0.4% vs. + 1.7% (P = 0.27). Adding 3-year clodronate treatment to antioestrogen therapy improved BMD marginally at 3 years: lumbar spine + 1.0% vs. -1.7% (P = 0.01) and femoral neck + 2.4% vs. -0.4% (P = 0.12). This was also seen at 5 years of follow-up, 2 years after termination of the antiresorptive therapy: HRT recent users vs. HRT non-users in lumbar spine -6.5% vs. +0.5% (P< 0.0001) and in femoral neck -4.8% vs. -1.5% (P = 0.38); and clodronate vs. controls in lumbar spine -1.0% vs. -3.2% (P = 0.06) and in femoral neck -0.1% vs. -5.2% (P = 0.001, respectively). The type of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen and toremifene) had no significant influence on BMD changes. We conclude from this study that postmenopausal women who have recently discontinued HRT experience more rapid bone loss than HRT non-users. Neither 3-year antioestrogen therapy alone nor antioestrogen together with clodronate could totally prevent the bone loss related to HRT withdrawal in lumbar spine, even though clodronate seemed to retard it.