Incidental LV LGE on CMR Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation Predicts Recurrence After Ablation Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LV-LGE) incidentally found in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who undergo ablation therapy. BACKGROUND: LV-LGE provides prognostic information in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. However, data on the clinical significance of incidental LV-LGE in the AF population are limited. METHODS: A total of 778 patients who were referred for radiofrequency ablation of AF underwent cardiac magnetic resonance examinations between June 2006 and January 2013. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or ablation therapy were excluded. The presence of LV-LGE was assessed by experienced imaging physicians. Patients were followed for arrhythmia recurrence after the radiofrequency ablation procedure. RESULTS: Of 598 patients included in the study, 60% were men with a mean age of 64 years and a median AF duration of 25 months. LV-LGE was detected in 39 patients (6.5%). There were 240 arrhythmia recurrences observed involving 40% of patients over a median follow-up period of 52 months. On univariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.03), male sex (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.86), diabetes (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.27), CHADS2 score (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.36), CHA2DS2-VASc score (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.30), left atrial (LA) fibrosis (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.41 to 1.96), LV-LGE (HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.03), persistent AF (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.09), and LA area (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.05) were significantly associated with arrhythmia recurrence. The recurrence rate was 69% in patients with LV-LGE compared with 38% in patients without LV-LGE (p < 0.001). In a multivariate model, LA fibrosis and LV-LGE were independent predictors of arrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In AF patients without history of myocardial infarction, LV-LGE is a significant independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence after ablation therapy.

Perioperative antiplatelet management in patients with coronary artery stenting.

Coronary artery disease is the primary cause of mortality in men and women in the United States. Transcatheter coronary intervention is the mainstay of treatment for patients with acute coronary artery disease presentations and patients with stable disease. Although percutaneous intervention initially only included balloon angioplasty, it now typically involves the placement of intracoronary stents. To overcome the limitations of bare-metal stents, namely in-stent restenosis, stents have been developed that remove pharmaceuticals that reduce neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis. However, these pharmaceutical agents also delay stent endothelialization, posing a prolonged risk of in situ thrombosis. Placement of an intracoronary stent (eg, bare-metal or drug-eluting stent) requires dual antiplatelet therapy to prevent the potentially life-threatening complication of stent thrombosis. The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following stent placement is unknown. This article discusses the factors to be considered when deciding when dual antiplatelet therapy can be safely discontinued. Unfortunately, in the hospital setting, this decision to interrupt dual antiplatelet therapy frequently must be made shortly after stent placement because of unanticipated surgical procedures or other unforeseen complications. The decision of when dual antiplatelet therapy can be safely interrupted needs to be individualized for each patient and involves factoring in the type of stent; the location and complexity of the lesion stented; post-stent lesion characteristics; the amount of time since stent placement; and the antiplatelet regimen currently in use, along with its implication for bleeding during the proposed procedure. Having a protocol in place, such as the protocol described in this article, can help guide this decision-making process and avoid confusion and potential error.