Writing in two different scripts promotes fine motor control.

Biscriptuality is the ability to write in two different scripts. Achieving handwriting expertise in a single script demands years of intensive practice, and these demands are even stronger when two scripts must be mastered. Biscriptuality could thus impact the cognitive and motor skills underlying graphomotor control. Here, we aimed at establishing that biscriptuality enhances graphomotor control, and at testing whether biscriptuals have better fine motor skills and working memory performance compared to Latin monoscriptuals. We found that biscriptuals perform better than monoscriptuals on graphomotor tasks, and on 3 types of fine motor control tasks indexing dexterity, motor timing under spatial constraints, and spontaneous motor tempo; the two groups did not significantly differ in their working memory performance. These results demonstrate that writing expertise widely impacts the organization of the motor system.

From gifted to high potential and twice exceptional: A state-of-the-art meta-review.

Despite the abundant literature on intelligence and high potential individuals, there is still a lack of international consensus on the terminology and clinical characteristics associated to this population. It has been argued that unstandardized use of diagnosis tools and research methods make comparisons and interpretations of scientific and epidemiological evidence difficult in this field. If multiple cognitive and psychological models have attempted to explain the mechanisms underlying high potentiality, there is a need to confront new scientific evidence with the old, to uproot a global understanding of what constitutes the neurocognitive profile of high-potential in gifted individuals. Another particularly relevant aspect of applied research on high potentiality concerns the challenges faced by individuals referred to as "twice exceptional" in the field of education and in their socio-affective life. Some individuals have demonstrated high forms of intelligence together with learning, affective or neurodevelopmental disorders posing the question as to whether compensating or exacerbating psycho-cognitive mechanisms might underlie their observed behavior. Elucidating same will prove relevant to questions concerning the possible need for differential diagnosis tools, specialized educational and clinical support. A meta-review of the latest findings from neuroscience to developmental psychology, might help in the conception and reviewing of intervention strategies.

Manual asymmetries in reaching movement control. I: Study of right-handers.

Two experiments investigated manual asymmetries in the control of rapid reaching movements according to the movement parameters to be controlled. Single- and double-step reaching movements were performed by right-handed subjects with both hands. Pro and retroactive processes involved in rapid movement control were investigated. Manual performances and kinematic properties of hand movements showed that various forms of hemispheric specialization were involved in sensori-motor information processing. It was shown that the effects of hemispheric specialization were specific to the task constraints, that is, to the various operations involved in movement control.

Manual asymmetries in reaching movement control. II: Study of left-handers.

Two experiments performed with left-handed subjects investigated how the manual asymmetries and hemispheric specialization involved in visuo-manual coordination are associated with handedness. Pro and retroactive processes involved in rapid movement control were analyzed according to the different movement parameters to be controlled, similar to studies performed with right-handers (Boulinguez, Nougier and Velay, 2001). Manual performances and kinematic properties of reaching movements showed that the left and right hands of left-handers behaved in the same way as the left and right hands of right-handers. Results are discussed in the light of the independence of handedness and other forms of cerebral dominance in sensori-motor information processing involved in hand movements.

Hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric transfer in pointing depend on the spatial components of the movement.

The purpose of the present study was to compare the asymmetry and transfer in 3 pointing movements with increasing spatial requirements. The triggering signal was one of four visual targets appearing on the right or left of a central fixation point (FP). The first task consisted in simply removing the arm from the starting platform; the second was a pointing movement towards the FP, and the third was a classical pointing task towards one of the four lateral targets. 20 right-handers (Rhrs) and 20 left-handers (Lhrs) participated in this experiment. In the classical pointing task (task 3), the reaction times were shorter in the Rhrs using their left hand. No such hand-related difference was observed in the Lhrs. No hand asymmetry was observed in the other tasks. In addition, the responses were faster in the uncrossed than in the crossed conditions, in task 3 only. It was concluded that in pointing tasks, both the hemispheric asymmetry and the interhemispheric transfer depend on the spatial requirements of the movement.

Hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric transfer in reaching programming.

The purpose of this study was to explore the intrahemispheric processes and the interhemispheric transfer that occur during the programming of a pointing movement. Twenty five subjects participated in this experiment: 12 were right-handed (Rhr), 12 left-handed (Lhr), and 1 was left-handed with a posterior callosal lesion. The task consisted in producing an open loop pointing response toward a visual target appearing briefly on the right or the left of a central fixation point. Reaction times (RTs) were shorter for the Rhrs when reaching with the left hand than with the right hand. No such hand-related difference was observed in the Lhrs. The left hand advantage indicates that one process was faster in the right hemisphere of Rhrs. This faster process appears not to be visual but motor or visuomotor. For either hand, responses were faster when the target appeared in the visual field homolateral to the pointing hand (uncrossed condition) than when it appeared contralaterally to the hand (crossed condition). The crossed vs uncrossed difference did not vary between Rhrs and Lhrs or between the hands. The transfer time between the hemispheres was symmetrical whatever its direction. The partially callosotomized left-handed subject was two-fold slower than the control Lhrs. His uncrossed responses were faster than the crossed ones, but his interhemispheric transfer time was very asymmetrical: it was normal from right to left hemisphere but was highly increased in the opposite direction. An attempt at modelling the RT data is proposed and the possibility of different callosal locations for the interhemispheric transfer is discussed.

Motor and perceptual responses to horizontal and vertical eye vibration in humans.

Previous studies have shown that low amplitude/high frequency mechanical vibration applied to the human eye muscles results in the illusory movement of a luminous spot fixated in total darkness. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a vibration-induced motor response also occurs in eye muscles, and to check whether the visual illusions actually result from the proprioceptors being activated by the vibration, or whether they are simply due to the retinal slip induced by the reflex eye movement. The effects of the vibratory stimuli on the inferior rectus (IR) and lateral rectus (LR) muscles were evaluated by recording subjects' eye position changes. When applied to the IR muscle, vibration effectively elicited an upward visual illusion accompanied by a small downward ocular rotation, whereas when applied to the LR muscle, it also induced horizontal visual illusion, which was less frequent and weaker than the vertical one, but no ocular rotation. We concluded that visual illusions of this kind cannot be attributable to the retinal motion of the image of the fixated point. The difference between the vertical and horizontal vibratory motor responses is discussed as regards the particular role that oculo-muscular proprioception may play in the vertical muscles.

Properties of eye movements induced by activation of neck muscle proprioceptors.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that neck muscle vibration can induce visual illusory movements and eye movements under subdued ambient illumination in human subjects with the head and body fixed. The subjects viewed a fixation light with one eye and the other eye was covered. The eye movements were recorded with an infrared system mounted in goggles attached to the head of the subject. METHODS: In order to further examine the properties of these cervico-ocular reactions and reveal any artefacts in the eye movement recordings, we have studied (1) the effect of increasing the ambient light, which made visual illusory movements disappear, (2) the timing between the illusory movement and the eye movement in subdued light, (3) the effect of viewing the target through a pin-hole, which would reveal artefacts due to head movement, and (4) the effect of mounting the eye movement recording system on the head support, which would allow recording to the absolute eye position change. RESULTS: The results of these experiments showed no significant difference from those that were reported previously. Eye movements of about the same amplitude were induced in both eyes under all conditions, and there was no time difference in the occurrence of visual illusory movements and eye movements. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm that neck muscle vibration can induce eye position changes. This seems to confirm that the proprioceptive messages originating in the neck muscles are processed together with visual information of eye position in determining gaze direction.

Shift in saccadic direction induced in humans by proprioceptive manipulation: a comparison between memory-guided and visually guided saccades.

It is nowadays generally recognized that saccades to remembered targets are planned in a craniotopic frame of reference by combining retinal input with eye position signal. The origin of the eye position signal is still a matter of controversy, however. Does it arise from an efferent copy or is it supplied by the sensory receptors with which the extraocular muscles are endowed? When applied to skeletal muscles, vibration elicits spindle responses simulating a stretching of the vibrated muscle. When vibration is applied to the inferior rectus muscle (IR), it induces the illusion that a stationary fixating point is moving upward. Here we attempted to change the initial eye position signal supplied to the oculomotor system before a memory- or visuo-guided saccade to a 10 degrees left target by applying mechanical vibration to the IR muscle. We wanted to determine whether modifying extraocular proprioceptive cues during the programming phase of a saccade might affect the latter's trajectory. In the memory-guided condition, it was observed that the saccades ended lower down when vibration was applied than in the control condition. Conversely, the visuo-guided saccades were not affected by the vibration. The above results mean first that extraocular proprioceptive cues are used as an initial eye position signal when a memory guided saccade has to be planned. Secondly, they suggest that extraocular proprioception may not be used to produce a visuo-guided saccade, or that this type of saccade is computed solely on the basis of retinal cues.

Eye proprioception and visual localization in humans: influence of ocular dominance and visual context.

It has been previously established that the application of low amplitude mechanical vibrations to the inferior rectus muscle of human subjects results in an illusory upward movement of a luminous spot fixated in total darkness, and in a corresponding overshooting of the target when the subject is asked to point to this spot. In the first experiment described here, we compared the effects of applying vibrations to each eye separately and to both eyes simultaneously, under monocular and binocular viewing conditions, in left- and right-eyed subjects. The results confirmed that proprioceptive signals arising from both eyes are involved in egocentric visual localization. A proprioceptive dominance was observed however since vibration of the dominant eye gave rise to larger pointing displacements. In addition, whichever eye was stimulated, the pointing shift induced by vibrating a covered eye was of smaller amplitude than that which occurred when vibrations were applied to the viewing eye. The second experiment showed that both the vibration induced illusions and the pointing shifts disappeared in a structured visual context, which suggests that the processes involved when the target is viewed in darkness might differ from those occurring in structured surroundings.

Proprioceptive control of goal-directed movements in man, studied by means of vibratory muscle tendon stimulation.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of propriomuscular feedback in the control of pluriarticular pointing movements, performed without visual feedback toward visual targets. The proprioceptive inputs were distorted during movements by applying vibration to the distal tendon of the biceps muscle. Various movement and vibration durations were imposed. The results show that vibration affects the spatial outcome of the movements. The effects of vibration were movement time-independent when the durations were shorter than 450 ms and became movement time-dependent with longer durations. Moreover, the effects of vibration became more marked when a short vibration was applied at the end rather than at the beginning of a slow movement. These studies suggest that at least two types of proprioceptive control loops may be involved in correcting this kind of movement, depending on the execution time. In slow movements, the final phase might be a privileged period for on-line, propriomuscular-based corrections. Lastly, it emerged that the regulation of a goal-directed movement on the basis of proprioceptive feedback processing can take place within at most 200 ms.

A neural network model for the intersensory coordination involved in goal-directed movements.

A neural network model for a sensorimotor system, which was developed to simulate oriented movements in man, is presented. It is composed of a formal neural network comprising two layers: a sensory layer receiving and processing sensory inputs, and a motor layer driving a simulated arm. The sensory layer is an extension of the topological network previously proposed by Kohonen (1984). Two kinds of sensory modality, proprioceptive and exteroceptive, are used to define the arm position. Each sensory cell receives proprioceptive inputs provided by each arm-joint together with the exteroceptive inputs. This sensory layer is therefore a kind of associative layer which integrates two separate sensory signals relating to movement coding. It is connected to the motor layer by means of adaptive synapses which provide a physical link between a motor activity and its sensory consequences. After a learning period, the spatial map which emerges in the sensory layer clearly depends on the sensory inputs and an associative map of both the arm and the extra-personal space is built up if proprioceptive and exteroceptive signals are processed together. The sensorimotor transformations occurring in the junctions linking the sensory and motor layers are organized in such a manner that the simulated arm becomes able to reach towards and track a target in extra-personal space. Proprioception serves to determine the final arm posture adopted and to correct the ongoing movement in cases where changes in the target location occur. With a view of developing a sensorimotor control system with more realistic salient features, a robotic model was coupled with the formal neural network. This robotic implementation of our model shows the capacity of formal neural networks to control the displacement of mechanical devices.

Eye and neck proprioceptive messages contribute to the spatial coding of retinal input in visually oriented activities.

The egocentric localization of objects in extrapersonal space requires that the retinal and extraretinal signals specifying the gaze direction be simultaneously processed. The question as to whether the extraretinal signal is of central or peripheral origin is still a matter of controversy, however. Three experiments were carried out to investigate the following hypotheses: 1) that the proprioceptive feedback originating in eye and neck muscles might provide the CNS with some indication about the gaze direction; and 2) that the retinal and proprioceptive extraretinal inputs might be jointly processed depending on whether they are of monocular or binocular origin. Application of low amplitude mechanical vibrations to either the extraocular or neck muscles (or both) of a subject looking monocularly at a small luminous target in darkness resulted in an illusory movement of the target, the direction of which depended on which muscle was stimulated. A slow upward target displacement occurred on vibrating the eye inferior rectus or the neck sterno-cleido-mastoidus muscles, whereas a downward shift was induced when the dorsal neck muscles (trapezius and splenius) were vibrated. The extent of the perceptual effects reported by subjects was measured in an open-loop pointing task in which they were asked to point at the perceived position of the target. These results extend to visually-oriented behavior the role of extraocular and neck proprioceptive inputs previously described in the case of postural regulation, since they clearly show that these messages contribute to specifying the gaze direction. This suggests that the extraretinal signal might include a proprioceptive component.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)