Tracking the progeny of adoptively transferred virus-specific T cells in patients posttransplant using TCR sequencing.

Adoptive cellular therapies with T cells are increasingly used to treat a variety of conditions. For instance, in a recent phase 1/2 trial, we prophylactically administered multivirus-specific T-cell products to protect recipients of T-cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell grafts against viral reactivation. To establish treatment efficacy, it is important to determine the fate of the individual transferred T-cell populations. However, it is difficult to unequivocally distinguish progeny of the transferred T-cell products from recipient- or stem cell graft-derived T cells that survived T-cell depletion during conditioning or stem cell graft manipulation. Using messenger RNA sequencing of the T-cell receptor ß-chains of the individual virus-specific T-cell populations within these T-cell products, we were able to track the multiple clonal virus-specific subpopulations in peripheral blood and distinguish recipient- and stem cell graft-derived virus-specific T cells from the progeny of the infused T-cell products. We observed in vivo expansion of virus-specific T cells that were exclusively derived from the T-cell products with similar kinetics as the expansion of virus-specific T cells that could also be detected before the T-cell product infusion. In addition, we demonstrated persistence of virus-specific T cells derived from the T-cell products in most patients who did not show viral reactivation. This study demonstrates that virus-specific T cells from prophylactically infused multiantigen-specific T-cell products can expand in response to antigen encounter in vivo and even persist in the absence of early viral reactivation.

CMV seronegative donors: Effect on clinical severity of CMV infection and reconstitution of CMV-specific immunity.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cells are crucial to prevent CMV disease. CMV seropositive recipients transplanted with stem cells from a CMV seronegative allogeneic donor (R+D-) may be at risk for CMV disease due to absence of donor CMV-specific memory T-cells in the graft. METHODS: We analyzed the duration of CMV reactivations and the incidence of CMV disease in R+D- and R+D+ patients after alemtuzumab-based T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation (TCD alloSCT). To determine the presence of donor-derived primary CMV-specific T-cell responses we analyzed the origin of CMV-specific T-cells in R+D- patients. RESULTS: The duration of CMV reactivations (54 versus 38 days, respectively, p = 0.048) and the incidence of CMV disease (0.14 versus 0.02, p = 0.003 at 1 year after alloSCT) were higher in R+D- patients compared to R+D+ patients. In R+D- patients, CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were mainly of recipient origin. However, in 53% of R+D- patients donor-derived CMV-specific T-cells were detected within the first year. CONCLUSIONS: In R+D- patients, immunity against CMV was predominantly mediated by recipient T-cells. Nevertheless, donor CMV serostatus significantly influenced the clinical severity of CMV reactivations indicating the role of CMV-specific memory T-cells transferred with the graft, despite the ultimate formation of primary donor-derived CMV-specific T-cell responses in R+D- patients.