Ready for practice? National recommendations for emergency medicine transition to practice curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Transition from residency to unsupervised practice represents a critical stage in learning and professional identity formation, yet there is a paucity of literature to inform residency curricula and emergency department transition programming for new faculty. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based recommendations to optimize the transition to practice phase of emergency medicine training. METHODS: A literature review and results of a survey of emergency medicine (EM) residency program directors informed focus groups of recent (within 5 years) EM graduates. Focus group transcripts were analyzed following conventional content analysis. Preliminary recommendations, based on identified themes, were drafted and presented at the 2022 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium on Education. Through a live presentation, symposium attendees representing the Canadian national EM community participated in a facilitated discussion of the recommendations. The authors incorporated this feedback to construct a final set of 14 recommendations, 8 targeted toward residency training programs and 6 specific to department leadership. CONCLUSION: The Canadian EM community used a structured process to develop 14 best practice recommendations to enhance the transition to practice phase of residency training as well as the transition period in the career of junior attending physicians.

ABSTRAIT: ARRIèRE-PLAN: La transition de la résidence à la pratique non supervisée représente une étape cruciale de l'apprentissage et de la formation de l'identité professionnelle, mais il y a peu de documentation pour éclairer les programmes de résidence et les programmes de transition des services d'urgence pour les nouveaux professeurs. OBJECTIF: L'objectif de cette étude était d'élaborer des recommandations consensuelles pour optimiser la transition vers la pratique de la formation en médecine d'urgence. MéTHODES: Une recension des écrits et les résultats d'un sondage auprès des directeurs des programmes de résidence en médecine d'urgence (GU) ont informé les groupes de discussion des diplômés récents (moins de cinq ans) en GU. Les transcriptions des groupes de discussion ont été analysées à la suite d'une analyse du contenu classique. Des recommandations préliminaires, fondées sur des thèmes déterminés, ont été rédigées et présentées au Symposium universitaire sur l'éducation de 2022 de l'Association canadienne des médecins d'urgence (ACMU). Au moyen d'une présentation en direct, les participants au symposium représentant la communauté nationale canadienne de la GU ont participé à une discussion dirigée sur les recommandations. Les auteurs ont intégré ces commentaires pour élaborer un ensemble final de 14 recommandations, 8 ciblant les programmes de formation en résidence et 6 ciblant le leadership ministériel. CONCLUSIONS: La communauté canadienne de la GU a utilisé un processus structuré pour élaborer 14 recommandations de pratiques exemplaires afin d'améliorer la transition à la phase de pratique de la formation en résidence ainsi que la période de transition dans la carrière des médecins traitants débutants.

Emergency Medicine Oral Case Presentations: Evaluation of a Novel Curriculum.

OBJECTIVES: Oral case presentation (OCP) is recognized as a central educational and patient care activity, yet has not been well studied in the emergency medicine (EM) setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a novel curriculum on medical students' EM-OCP skills. METHODS: An EM-OCP assessment tool and novel blended curriculum were developed based on results from a Canadian survey of emergency physicians and focus groups with key stakeholders. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 96 clerkship students between 2017 and 2018. Students were randomly assigned into an intervention group where they completed a novel EM-OCP curriculum or a control group without the curriculum. A pretest baseline assessment of students' OCP skills was performed using a standardized patient case at the beginning of their EM rotation. Similarly, all students completed a posttest assessment with a different standardized patient case at the end of their 6-week EM rotation. Audio recordings of pre- and posttests were assessed using the EM-OCP assessment tool by two blinded assessors. RESULTS: Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, all students demonstrated improvement in EM-OCP skills between their pretest and posttest; however, those who received the curriculum (intervention group) showed significantly greater improvement in "synthesis of information," "management," and "overall entrustment decision" scores. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a novel EM-OCP curriculum resulted in improved clinical reasoning and higher entrustment scores. This curriculum could improve OCP performance not only in EM settings but also across specialties where medical students and residents manage critically ill patients.

Script-theory virtual case: A novel tool for education and research.

Context/Setting: The script theory of diagnostic reasoning proposes that clinicians evaluate cases in the context of an "illness script," iteratively testing internal hypotheses against new information eventually reaching a diagnosis. We present a novel tool for teaching diagnostic reasoning to undergraduate medical students based on an adaptation of script theory. INTERVENTION: We developed a virtual patient case that used clinically authentic audio and video, interactive three-dimensional (3D) body images, and a simulated electronic medical record. Next, we used interactive slide bars to record respondents' likelihood estimates of diagnostic possibilities at various stages of the case. Responses were dynamically compared to data from expert clinicians and peers. Comparative frequency distributions were presented to the learner and final diagnostic likelihood estimates were analyzed. Detailed student feedback was collected. OBSERVATIONS: Over two academic years, 322 students participated. Student diagnostic likelihood estimates were similar year to year, but were consistently different from expert clinician estimates. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive: students found the case was novel, innovative, clinically authentic, and a valuable learning experience. DISCUSSION: We demonstrate the successful implementation of a novel approach to teaching diagnostic reasoning. Future study may delineate reasoning processes associated with differences between novice and expert responses.