Development and validation of an UPLC-MS/MS assay for the simultaneous quantification of seven commonly used antibiotics in human plasma and its application in therapeutic drug monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an UPLC-MS/MS assay for simultaneous determination of the total concentration of ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, piperacillin, tazobactam, sulfamethoxazole, N-acetyl sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, and the protein-unbound concentration of flucloxacillin, in human plasma to be used for research and clinical practice. METHODS: Sample pretreatment included protein precipitation with methanol. For the measurement of protein-unbound flucloxacillin, ultrafiltration was performed at physiological temperature. For all compounds, a stable isotopically labelled internal standard was used. Reliability of the results was assessed by participation in an international quality control programme. RESULTS: The assay was successfully validated according to the EMA guidelines over a concentration range of 0.5-100 mg/L for ceftazidime, 0.05-10 mg/L for ciprofloxacin, 0.4-125 mg/L for flucloxacillin, 0.2-60 mg/L for piperacillin, 0.15-30 mg/L for tazobactam, 1-200 mg/L for sulfamethoxazole and N-acetyl sulfamethoxazole, 0.05-10 mg/L for trimethoprim and 0.10-50 mg/L for unbound flucloxacillin. For measurement of total concentrations, the within- and between-day accuracy ranged from 90.0% to 109%, and 93.4% to 108%, respectively. Within- and between-day precision (variation coefficients, CVs) ranged from 1.70% to 11.2%, and 0.290% to 5.30%, respectively. For unbound flucloxacillin, within-day accuracy ranged from 103% to 106% and between-day accuracy from 102% to 105%. The within- and between-day CVs ranged from 1.92% to 7.11%. Results of the international quality control programme showed that the assay is reliable. CONCLUSIONS: The method provided reliable, precise and accurate measurement of seven commonly prescribed antibiotics, including the unbound concentration of flucloxacillin. This method is now routinely applied in research and clinical practice.

Metformin and daclatasvir: absence of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug interaction in healthy volunteers.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the proposed organic cation transporter (OCT) inhibitor daclatasvir on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the OCT substrate metformin. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, randomized, crossover trial in 20 healthy subjects. Treatment A consisted of metformin and treatment B consisted of metformin + daclatasvir. Pharmacokinetic curves were recorded at steady-state. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for metformin area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to 12 h (AUC0-12 ), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and final plasma concentration (Clast ). An oral glucose tolerance test was performed, measuring insulin, glucose and lactate levels. RESULTS: The GMRs (90% CI) of metformin AUC0-12 , Cmax and Clast (B vs. A) were 109% (102-116%), 108% (101-116%) and 112% (103-122%). The geometric mean AUC0-2 for insulin, glucose and lactate during treatments A and B were 84 h. mEl-1 and 90 h. mEl-1 , 13.6 h. mmol l-1 and 13.4 h. mmol l-1 , and 3.4 h. mmol l-1 and 3.5 h. mmol l-1 , respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bioequivalence analysis showed that daclatasvir does not influence the pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects. Pharmacodynamic parameters were also comparable between treatments.

Brief Report: Pharmacokinetics of Crushed Elvitegravir Combination Tablet Given With or Without Enteral Nutrition.

We investigated whether a fixed-dose combination tablet of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovirDF (Stribild) can be crushed and combined with enteral nutrition without influencing pharmacokinetics. This was an open-label, 3-period, single-dose, randomized, crossover trial in 24 healthy volunteers. Subjects received Stribild whole tablet with breakfast (reference), crushed/suspended Stribild + breakfast, crushed/suspended Stribild + enteral nutrition. Crushed/suspended Stribild + enteral nutrition was bioequivalent (90% confidence interval between 80% and 125%) with a whole Stribild tablet. Crushed/suspended Stribild + breakfast showed bioequivalence for the area under the curve (AUC0-32), but not for maximum concentration (Cmax) (considered not clinically relevant). Patients with swallowing difficulties or an enteral feeding tube can use crushed and suspended Stribild tablets.

Effect of fosamprenavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of single-dose olanzapine in healthy volunteers.

Psychosis and other mental illnesses are common in HIV-infected patients. Olanzapine is one of the preferred antipsychotic agents for the treatment of schizophrenia. Olanzapine is primarily metabolised by CYP1A2 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT). High-dose ritonavir has been shown to increase olanzapine elimination through induction of CYP1A2 and/or UGT, but the effect of low-dose ritonavir on olanzapine pharmacokinetics is unknown. Fosamprenavir is an HIV protease inhibitor that is boosted by low-dose ritonavir. To compensate for the induction of olanzapine metabolism by fosamprenavir/ritonavir, we hypothesised that a dose increase of olanzapine to 15 mg with fosamprenavir/ritonavir would lead to a similar area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with olanzapine 10 mg alone. An open-label, randomised, two-period, cross-over, single-centre trial was conducted in 24 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomised to one of the following treatments: (A) fosamprenavir/ritonavir 700/100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 16 days with a single dose of olanzapine 15 mg on Day 13, a wash-out period of 31 days and a single dose of olanzapine 10 mg on Day 48; or (B) the same medication in reverse order. Twenty subjects completed the trial. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of olanzapine AUClast, maximum drug concentration (C(max)) and apparent elimination half-life (t(1/2)) when taken with fosamprenavir/ritonavir versus olanzapine alone were 1.00 (0.93-1.08), 1.32 (1.18-1.47) and 0.68 (0.63-0.74), respectively. Fosamprenavir/ritonavir 700/100 mg b.i.d. appeared to induce olanzapine metabolism. We therefore propose a 50% dosage increase of olanzapine when combining with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor.