Clinical application of sensory protection of denervated muscle.

Following proximal peripheral nerve injury, motor recovery is often poor due to prolonged muscle denervation and loss of regenerative potential. The transfer of a sensory nerve to denervated muscle results in improved functional recovery in experimental models. The authors here report the first clinical case of sensory protection. Following a total hip arthroplasty, this patient experienced a complete sciatic nerve palsy with no recovery at 3 months postsurgery and profound denervation confirmed electrodiagnostically. He underwent simultaneous neurolysis of the sciatic nerve and saphenous nerve transfers to the tibialis anterior branch of the peroneal nerve and gastrocnemius branch from the tibial nerve. He noted an early proprioceptive response. Electromyography demonstrated initially selective amelioration of denervation potentials followed by improved motor recovery in sensory protected muscles only. The patient reported clinically significant functional improvements in activities of daily living. The authors hypothesize that the presence of a sensory nerve during muscle denervation can improve functional motor recovery.

A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery: health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the health-related quality of life experienced by breast reduction patients using four reliable and validated health-related quality-of-life measures. METHODS: Consecutive patients with breast hypertrophy completed the Health Utilities Index Mark 2, the Health Utilities Index Mark 3, and the Breast Reduction Assessment Value and Outcomes instruments (the Short Form 36, the Multidimensional Body-Self Rating Questionnaire Appearance Assessment, and the Breast-Related Symptom Questionnaire) at 1 week and 1 day before surgery and at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: For the 52 patients in the study, mean scores for all quality-of-life instruments increased from the preoperative assessments to the postoperative assessments. The mean quality-adjusted life years gained per patient because of the surgery was 0.12 during the 1-year follow-up period. There was a positive relationship (p < 0.001) between breast resection weight and body mass index. However, body mass index and tissue resection weight were not significantly associated with Health Utilities Index Mark 3 change scores (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo breast reduction experience an important improvement in health-related quality of life according to four established measures. The improvement is most noticeable between 1 day before surgery and 1 month after surgery, after which it stabilizes for up to 1 year. The health-related quality-of-life effect of the surgery translates into an expected lifetime gain of 5.32 quality-adjusted life years, which is equivalent to each patient living an additional 5.32 years in perfect health. The authors conclude that there is no justification for the ongoing restriction or denials of third-party payments based on body mass index.

Application of the CONSORT statement to randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.

BACKGROUND: The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was developed by a group of clinical trialists, biostatisticians, epidemiologists and biomedical editors as a means to improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The purpose of the present study is to assess the reporting quality of published RCTs that compare endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) with open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) using the CONSORT statement. METHODS: A computerized literature search was conducted to identify all RCTs published from January 1989 to November 2004 that compared ECTR with OCTR. Foreign language studies were also included, and translated versions of these studies were obtained. Two investigators independently reviewed each eligible article and determined whether the authors reported on each of the 22 items of the CONSORT statement. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The mean scores for studies published before the introduction of the CONSORT statement and those published afterward were compared. Similarly, a comparison was made between foreign language studies and those published in English. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs comparing ECTR with OCTR met the inclusion criteria. The total scores on the CONSORT checklist ranged from 3 to 20, with a mean score of 9.83+/-3.79 (the maximum possible score was 22). The six studies published in foreign language journals had a statistically significantly lower mean score than the studies published in English language journals (7.00+/-2.76 versus 11.25+/-3.49, respectively; P<0.05). The mean score was higher for studies published after 1996 than for those published in 1996 or earlier (12.14+/-3.80 versus 8.36+/-3.11, respectively; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of reporting improved over time, but no study met all 22 criteria of the CONSORT statement. The CONSORT scores were higher for studies published after 1996 and for studies published in English language journals. Despite the improvement after 1996, most of these RCTs only reported one-half of the items listed on the CONSORT statement. Future investigators of surgical RCTs should make an effort to comply with the CONSORT checklist.

Methodology and measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments: a prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery.

BACKGROUND: Breast hypertrophy is associated with clinically important morbidity. A prospective study was conducted to assess the change in health-related quality of life (HRQL) following breast reduction mammoplasty. This paper describes the measurement properties of each of the HRQL questionnaires used. METHODS: The reliability, responsiveness, and the construct validity of each HRQL instrument (the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2) and Mark 3 (HUI3) and the Breast Reduction Assessment Value and Outcomes (BRAVO) instruments) were assessed. The BRAVO instruments are a set of separate instruments including the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Multidimensional Body Self Relations Questionnaire Appearance Assessment (MBSRQ-AS), and the Breast Related Symptoms Questionnaire (BRSQ). RESULTS: The HUI2, the HUI3, the MBSRQ-AS, and the breast severity symptom (BSS) score from the BRSQ all demonstrated good test-retest reliability. The SF-36 physical component summary, the MBSRQ-AS, and the BSS score demonstrated high responsiveness. The SF-36 mental component summary and the HUI3 had a moderate effect size and the HUI2 had a small effect size. All of the changes in scales are correlated in the same direction except for the SF-36 physical component summary and the SF-36 mental component summary. CONCLUSION: All four instruments were found to be reliable and responsive. These instruments can be used in similar clinical settings to evaluate the change in patients' HRQL.

Contribution of the distal nerve sheath to nerve and muscle preservation following denervation and sensory protection.

The goal of this study was to determine the contribution of the distal nerve sheath to sensory protection. Following tibial nerve transection, rats were assigned to one of the following groups: (1) saphenous-to-tibial nerve neurorrhaphy; (2) saphenous-to-gastrocnemius neurotization; (3) unprotected controls (tibial nerve transection); or (4) immediate common peroneal-to-tibial nerve neurorrhaphy. After a 6-month denervation period and motor reinnervation, ultrastructural, histologic, and morphometric analyses were performed on the distal tibial nerve and gastrocnemius muscle cross-sections. Sensory axons neurotized to muscle maintain existing muscle integrity, as demonstrated by less fibrosis, collagenization, and fat deposition, more than unprotected muscle, and preserve the distribution pattern of fast twitch fibers. However, neurorrhaphy of the sensory nerve to the distal tibial nerve (involving the distal nerve sheath) improves existing endoneurial sheath structure, demonstrated by reduced collagen, and enhances regeneration, shown by improved axon-to-Schwann cell coupling and increased axon area. The authors conclude that sensory protection of muscle does not require the distal nerve sheath, but that preservation of the distal sheath may contribute to enhanced nerve regeneration.

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression.

Controversy exists regarding the benefit of endoscopic carpal tunnel release versus open carpal tunnel release in terms of grip/pinch strength, scar tenderness, pain, return to work, reversible/irreversible nerve damage, and adverse effects. Although a number of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have been published on the subject, to date, no large definitive randomized controlled trial or meta-analysis has been performed comparing endoscopic to open carpal tunnel release. This meta-analysis was undertaken to address the effectiveness of endoscopic carpal tunnel release relative to open carpal tunnel release. Key outcome measures from 13 randomized controlled trials were extracted and statistically combined. Heterogeneity was observed in three of the outcomes (i.e., grip strength, pain, and return to work), but the causes of heterogeneity could not be explained because of insufficient detail in the reported studies. Using the Jadad et al. scale, nine of 13 studies were of low methodologic quality. The effect sizes were compared between the studies that were rated as high quality and the studies that were rated as low quality on the Jadad et al. scale. Similarly, the studies that were rated as high quality on the Gerritsen et al. scale were compared with those that were rated as low quality. No clinically significant difference in effect sizes was apparent between studies of high and low methodologic quality. This meta-analysis supports the conclusion that endoscopic carpal tunnel release is favored over the open carpal tunnel release in terms of a reduction in scar tenderness and increase in grip and pinch strength at a 12-week follow-up. With regard to symptom relief and return to work, the data are inconclusive. Irreversible nerve damage is uncommon in either technique; however, there is an increased susceptibility to reversible nerve injury that is three times as likely to occur with endoscopic carpal tunnel release than with open carpal tunnel release.

Surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a systematic review.

In most cases of basal joint osteoarthritis, surgery becomes an option at stages II, III, and IV, as classified by Eaton. Controversy exists regarding which technique achieves the best outcome. This systematic review was undertaken to address the question of which technique, if any, offers the best outcome to patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint greater than stage II. A thorough search of the electronic databases Cochrane, Cinahl, Healthstar, and MEDLINE/PubMed was undertaken to identify reviews and articles on primary comparative studies of the different surgical options. The methodological quality of the retrieved articles was assessed on the basis of specific criteria. Inclusion criteria were applied to 44 of 254 possibly relevant articles. Eight reviews and 18 comparative studies met the criteria and were reviewed. Each of the techniques, arthrodesis, trapeziectomy with or without biological/synthetic interposition, osteotomy, and joint replacement, was associated with unique benefits and risks. There was great variability in outcome measurements. The majority of retrieved review articles claim that ligamentous reconstruction and tendon interposition may represent the best option; however, validity assessment of these studies revealed methodological flaws. Furthermore, results from the articles on comparative studies indicate that ligamentous reconstruction and tendon interposition may provide no additional benefit when compared with arthrodesis and trapeziectomy alone or with tendon interposition. There is no consensus as to which clinical outcomes are most important in thumb basal joint surgery and how these should be measured. This renders the appraisal and comparison of such studies a challenging task. Until large randomized controlled trials that compare techniques in similar populations with respect to staging and prognostic factors are undertaken and the clinical outcomes are clearly defined, surgeons will continue to claim superiority of one technique over another without supporting evidence.

Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

This study compared the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap in postmastectomy reconstruction using a cost-effectiveness analysis. A decision analytic model was used. Medical costs associated with the two techniques were estimated from the Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits for 2002. Hospital costs were obtained from St. Joseph's Healthcare, a university teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The utilities of clinically important health states related to breast reconstruction were obtained from 32 "experts" across Canada and converted into quality-adjusted life years. The probabilities of these various clinically important health states being associated with the DIEP and free TRAM flaps were obtained after a thorough review of the literature. The DIEP flap was more costly than the free TRAM flap ($7026.47 versus $6508.29), but it provided more quality-adjusted life years than the free TRAM flap (28.88 years versus 28.53 years). The baseline incremental cost-utility ratio was $1464.30 per quality-adjusted life year, favoring adoption of the DIEP flap. Sensitivity analyses were performed by assuming that the probabilities of occurrence of hernia, abdominal bulging, total flap loss, operating room time, and hospital stay were identical with the DIEP and free TRAM techniques. By assuming that the probability of postoperative hernia for the DIEP flap increased from 0.008 to 0.054 (same as for TRAM flap), the incremental cost-utility ratio changed to $1435.00 per quality-adjusted life year. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the complication of hernia because the DIEP flap allegedly diminishes this complication. Increasing the probability of abdominal bulge from 0.041 to 0.103 for the DIEP flap changed the ratio to $2731.78 per quality-adjusted life year. When the probability of total flap failure was increased from 0.014 to 0.016, the ratio changed to $1384.01 per quality-adjusted life year. When the time in the operating room was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $4026.57 per quality-adjusted life year. If the hospital stay was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $1944.30 per quality-adjusted life year. On the basis of the baseline calculation and sensitivity analyses, the DIEP flap remained a cost-effective procedure. Thus, adoption of this new technique for postmastectomy reconstruction is warranted in the Canadian health care system.

A systematic review of reviews comparing the effectiveness of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression.

Controversy persists regarding the benefit of endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open carpal tunnel release for pain, numbness, strength, return to work and function, scar tenderness, and complications. For surgeons, a recommended first source of information on treatment effectiveness is a review of high-methodologic-quality articles. This review of reviews was undertaken to answer this clinical question regarding these outcomes. Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HealthSTAR databases were searched using the key words "endoscopic carpal tunnel," with limits "review or overview" and dates from 1989 to present. Five key journals were hand-searched. Any review with a reference to at least one randomized controlled trial that compared endoscopic carpal tunnel release to open carpal tunnel release was to be included. Two reviewers independently scanned titles and abstracts for potential relevance. Selection as relevant was confirmed through a review of full texts. Disagreements were resolved through discussion and consensus. The selected reviews were assessed for methodologic quality on the basis of the scale of Hoving et al. Of 48 articles initially identified, seven pertinent reviews were selected. Of these seven, three reviews of high methodologic quality concurred that there is no difference between the two techniques in symptom relief and that the evidence is conflicting for return to work and function. The risk of permanent median nerve injury does not differ between the techniques. The reviews indicated that the endoscopic carpal tunnel release technique is worse in terms of reversible nerve injury but superior in terms of grip strength and scar tenderness, at least in short-term follow-up. Several trials have not been incorporated in these reviews and statistical pooling has not been conducted. Further systematic review with meta-analysis may permit more definitive conclusions about the relative effectiveness of these two techniques, particularly with regard to return to work and function.

A methodological guide to performing a cost-utility study comparing surgical techniques.

BACKGROUND: When recommending the adoption of a new surgical intervention as opposed to maintaining an old one, surgeons need to consider the opportunity cost, which is the value of the forgone benefits. To inform these decisions, surgeons can use economic analyses of surgical practices. Unfortunately, economic analyses conducted alongside randomized controlled trials in surgery are rare. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to use data from a small randomized controlled trial to illustrate the methodology for a cost-utility analysis comparing two techniques of carpal tunnel release: open release without ('usual' technique) and with ('novel' technique) ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Eighteen eligible patients were entered into this prospective study. Fifteen were followed to six weeks postoperatively. One day preoperatively, and five days, three weeks and six weeks postoperatively, patients completed a self-administered Health Utilities Index Mark 2-3 questionnaire (utilities) and a case report form from which resource utilization (cost) was collected. Utilities were expressed as quality-adjusted life weeks, a fraction of quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: The mean total cost of the usual technique was lower than the novel technique, and the mean quality-adjusted life week was higher, favouring the usual technique. Indirect costs were four to nine times higher than direct costs in both techniques. CONCLUSION: The novel technique was more costly and less effective, and fell in the 'lose-lose' quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane; it was rejected in favour of the usual technique. This methodology should be applied when deciding whether to adopt novel surgical techniques in plastic surgery to optimize scarce health care resources.

HISTORIQUE: Au moment de recommander l'adoption d'une nou-velle intervention chirurgicale au lieu de conserver une ancienne intervention, les chirurgiens doivent tenir compte du coût de renonciation, qui correspond à la valeur des avantages auxquels ils renoncent. Pour étayer leurs décisions, les chirurgiens peuvent utiliser des analyses économiques des pratiques chirurgicales. Malheureusement, les analyses économiques menées conjointement avec des essais aléatoires et contrôlés sont rares. OBJECTIFS: La présente étude visait à utiliser les données d'un petit essai aléatoire et contrôlé pour illustrer la méthodologie d'une analyse coût-utilité comparant deux techniques de libération du tunnel du canal carpien : une libération ouverte sans (la technique « habituelle ¼) et avec (la « nouvelle ¼ technique) reconstruction ligamentaire. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Dix-huit patients admissibles ont participé à cette étude prospective. Quinze ont été suivis jusqu'à six semaines après l'opération. Un jour avant l'opération, puis cinq jours, trois semaines et six semaines après l'opération, les patients ont rempli eux-mêmes un questionnaire Health Utilities Index Mark 2-3 (utilité) et un formulaire de rapport de cas à partir duquel l'utilisation des ressources (coût) a été col-ligée. L'utilité était exprimée selon le nombre de semaines-personnes sans invalidité, une fraction des années-personnes sans invalidité. RÉSULTATS: Le coût total moyen de la technique habituelle était inférieur à celui de la nouvelle technique, et les semaines-personnes moyennes sans invalidité étaient plus élevées, ce qui favorisait la technique habituelle. Dans les deux techniques, les coûts indirects étaient de quatre à neuf fois plus élevés que les coûts directs. CONCLUSION: La nouvelle technique était plus coûteuse et moins efficace, et se classait dans le quadrant de double contrainte des régimes coût-efficacité. Elle a donc été rejetée en faveur de la technique habituelle. Cette méthodologie devrait être appliquée au moment de décider s'il est préférable d'adopter une nouvelle technique chirurgicale en chirurgie plastique, afin d'optimiser des ressources de santé limitées.

NGF, BDNF, NT-3, and GDNF mRNA expression in rat skeletal muscle following denervation and sensory protection.

Poor muscle and nerve functional recovery after nerve damage is a serious clinical problem, particularly if there is prolonged delay before nerve-muscle contact is reestablished. Our previous studies showed that sensory nerve cross-anastomosis (sensory protection) provides support to the denervated muscle. In the present study, we analyzed neurotrophic factor mRNA expression by RT-PCR in denervated rat gastrocnemius muscle receiving sensory protection with the saphenous nerve, compared to normal innervated muscle, to denervated muscle, and to denervated muscle repaired immediately with the peroneal (motor) nerve, after periods of 3 days to 3 months. No significant differences in mRNA levels of beta-actin, nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor or neurotrophin-3 were found between the sensory protection treatment and the denervated or the motor repair groups. However, sensory protection resulted in levels of muscle glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA expression that were lower than in denervated muscle and higher than in muscle given immediate motor repair. These results demonstrate that glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA is elevated following denervation but is partially down-regulated by sensory protection. Our study suggests that sensory protection provides a modified trophic environment by modulating neurotrophic factor synthesis in muscle.

Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction.

The purpose of this study was to compare the free TRAM to the unipedicled TRAM flap in postmastectomy reconstruction, using a cost-utility analysis. A decision analytic model was used for this study. Medical costs associated with the two techniques were estimated from the Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits (1998). Hospital costs were obtained from St. Joseph's Healthcare, a university hospital in Hamilton, Ontario. Utilities were obtained from 33 "experts" across Canada and then converted into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The probabilities of various health states associated with unipedicled and free TRAM flaps were obtained by reviewing several key articles. The free TRAM flap was more costly than the unipedicled TRAM flap, but it provided more QALYs. The baseline incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was $5,113.73/QALY, favoring adoption of the free TRAM flap. This study showed that the free TRAM flap is a cost-effective procedure for postmastectomy reconstruction in the Canadian healthcare system.

Ischemia of the hand secondary to radial artery thrombosis: A report of three cases.

Upper extremity arterial thrombosis, though rare, is more prevalent on the ulnar side of the circulation, with the most common etiology being repetitive blunt trauma to the hypothenar eminence. Radial artery thrombosis is even more rare and when it does occur, is associated most often with iatrogenic cannulation, producing subsequent thrombi and emboli. Three cases of spontaneous thrombosis of the radial artery extending to the superficial palmar arch and the princeps pollicis artery are presented here. Two patients underwent thrombectomies and one underwent excision of the thrombosed segment and reconstruction with a reversed saphenous vein graft. The etiology of the thrombus was consistent with cancer in two cases and trauma in one.

La thrombose artérielle des extrémités supérieures, bien qu'elle soit rare, est plus prévalentes du côté cubital de la circulation, l'étiologie la plus courante étant un traumatisme contondant à l'éminence hypothénar. La thrombose de l'artère radiale est encore plus rare et, lorsqu'elle se produit, elle s'associe surtout à une cannulation iatrogène, qui provoque une thrombose et une embolie subséquentes.Trois cas de thrombose spontanée de l'artère radiale s'étendant jusqu'à l'arche palmaire et à l'artère princeps pollicis sont présentés. Deux patients ont subi une thrombectomie et un a subi une excision du segment thrombosé et une reconstruction à l'aide d'une greffe de la veine saphène renversée. L'étiologie de la thrombose était compatible avec un cancer dans deux cas, et avec un traumatisme dans le troisième cas.