[Peripheral neuropathies during systemic diseases: Part II (vasculitis)]. / Neuropathies périphériques au cours des maladies de système : partie II (vascularites).

Primary systemic vasculitides, mainly of the small and medium-sized vessels, are frequently associated with peripheral neuropathies. When the disease is already known, the appearance of a neuropathy should suggest a specific injury, especially when associated with other systemic manifestations. Conversely, when neuropathy is inaugural, close collaboration between neurologists and internists is necessary to reach a diagnosis. A standardized electro-clinical investigation specifying the topography, the evolution and the mechanism of the nerve damage enables the positive diagnosis of the neuropathy. Several elements orient the etiological diagnosis and allow to eliminate the main differential diagnosis: non systemic vasculitic neuropathy. The existence of associated systemic manifestations (glomerular or vascular nephropathy, interstitial lung disease, intra-alveolar hemorrhage, ENT involvement…), biological markers (ANCA, cryoglobulinemia, rheumatoid factor), and invasive examinations allowing histological analysis (neuromuscular biopsy) are all useful tools for.

[Peripheral neuropathies during systemic diseases: Part I (connective tissue diseases and granulomatosis)]. / Neuropathies périphériques au cours des maladies de système : partie I (connectivites et granulomatoses).

Systemic diseases (connective disease, granulomatosis) may be associated with peripheral neuropathies. The diagnosis can be complex when the neuropathy is the presenting manifestation of the disease, requiring close collaboration between neurologists and internists. Conversely, when the systemic disease is already known, the main question remaining is its imputability in the neuropathy. Regardless of the situation, the positive diagnosis of neuropathy is based on a systematic and rigorous electro-clinical investigation, specifying the topography, the evolution and the mechanism of the nerve damage. Certain imaging examinations, such as nerve and/or plexus MRI, or other more invasive examinations (skin biopsy, neuromuscular biopsy) enable to specify the topography and the mechanism of the injury. The imputability of the neuropathy in the course of a known systemic disease is based mainly on its electro-clinical pattern, on which the alternatives diagnoses depend. In the case of an inaugural neuropathy, a set of arguments orients the diagnosis, including the underlying terrain (young subject), possible associated systemic manifestations (inflammatory arthralgias, polyadenopathy), results of first-line laboratory tests (lymphopenia, hyper-gammaglobulinemia, hypocomplementemia), autoantibodies (antinuclear, anti-native DNA, anti-SSA/B) and sometimes invasive examinations (neuromuscular biopsy).

Large vessel stroke in six patients following SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective case study series of acute thrombotic complications on stable underlying atherosclerotic disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ischaemic stroke has been described in association with COVID-19. Several pathophysiological mechanisms have been suggested, i.e. prothrombotic state, cardiac injury etc. It was sought to assess the potential association between ischaemic stroke associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and underlying atherosclerotic lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of stroke related to large vessel occlusion was conducted amongst patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and underlying mild atherosclerotic disease, between 19 March and 19 April 2020 in six different stroke centers in the Île-de France area, France. RESULTS: The median age was 52 years, median body mass index was 29.5 kg/m2 . All patients displayed previous vascular risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, dyslipidemia or body mass index > 25. The delay between the first respiratory symptoms of COVID-19 and stroke was 11.5 days. At baseline, all had tandem occlusions, i.e. intracerebral and extracerebral thrombus assessed with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Cases displayed a large thrombus in the cervical carotid artery with underlying mild non-stenosing atheroma, after an etiological workup based on angio-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and/or cervical echography. CONCLUSION: Our study should alert clinicians to scrutinize any new onset of ischaemic stroke during COVID-19 infection, mainly in patients with vascular risk factors or underlying atherosclerotic lesions.

The impact of antidepressant use on social functioning: reboxetine versus fluoxetine.

Depression compromises affected individuals' functional well-being and impairs their level of social and workplace performance. Improved social functioning in depressed patients may improve their work productivity. This study evaluated the differential effects of two antidepressants on social functioning outcomes for patients with major depression comparing reboxetine, a non-tricyclic, selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor and fluoxetine, a commonly prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. A model using data from 284 depressed patients (138 reboxetine, 146 fluoxetine) in two 8-week clinical trials was developed to predict the percentage change over time in continuous outcome assessments as measured by a 21-item self-rating scale called the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS). The percentage change from baseline SASS score was modelled as a function of both time-invariant and time-varying covariates. Results suggest that, by mid-study, the more severely ill subjects benefitted more from reboxetine treatment in terms of the outcome improvement rate and, by study-end, this effect also extended into the less severely ill population. In addition, a significant relationship was identified between the change in depression symptom severity as measured by the standard Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score and the change in social functioning per the SASS.

Who gets chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and factors associated with chemotherapy use in elderly patients presenting with advanced lung cancer. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using administrative data. SETTING AND PATIENTS: We analyzed the medical bills for the 6,308 Medicare patients > 65 years old with diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the 11 SEER (survival, epidemiology, and end results) regions between 1991 and 1993. The main outcome measure, chemotherapy administration, was identified by the relevant medical billing codes. Patient sociodemographic and disease characteristics were obtained from the SEER database and census data. RESULTS: Almost 22% of patients received chemotherapy at some time for their metastatic NSCLC. As expected, younger patients and those with fewer comorbid conditions were more likely to receive chemotherapy. However, several nonmedical factors, such as nonblack race, higher socioeconomic status, treatment in a teaching hospital, and living in the Seattle/Puget Sound or Los Angeles SEER regions, also significantly increased a patient's likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Compared to previous reports, the prevalence of chemotherapy use for advanced NSCLC appears to be increasing. However, despite uniform health insurance coverage, there is wide variation in the utilization of palliative chemotherapy among Medicare patients, and nonmedical factors are strong predictors of whether a patient receives chemotherapy. While it is impossible to know the appropriate rate of usage, nonmedical factors should only influence a patient's likelihood of receiving treatment if they reflect patient treatment preference. Research to further clarify the costs, benefits, and patient preferences for chemotherapy in this patient population is warranted in order to minimize the effect of nonmedical biases on management decisions.

Using healthcare claims data for outcomes research and pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Healthcare claims data are a practical complement to data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for evaluating health outcomes in non-experimental settings and for generalising results to a broader population. Claims data are a relatively inexpensive way to obtain useful information about patient demographics, as well as healthcare resources used for specific medical conditions and procedures from large numbers of patients over extended periods of time. With claims data, it is possible to identify patients who meet specific medical or sociodemographic criteria, estimate their costs, define episodes of medical care, and measure outcomes more globally than is possible with RCT data. Statistical methods exist to address some of the inherent issues with claims data due to their limited clinical detail. We also identify extensions of claims data to productivity issues, the use of centralised claims data such as in Canada, and the application of new statistical methods to outcomes research literature such as sample selection correction methods.

Combined cardiac catheterization for uncomplicated ischemic heart disease in a Medicare population.

PURPOSE: Experts recommend left heart catheterization alone to evaluate uncomplicated ischemic heart disease, reserving right heart catheterization for specific indications. Yet some centers routinely perform combined cardiac catheterization (left heart catheterization and right heart catheterization together). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using 1992-1993 Pennsylvania Medicare claims for cardiac catheterizations (n = 41,180), we examined rates of combined cardiac catheterization for patients with uncomplicated ischemic heart disease for each hospital (n = 73) that performed catheterizations. We compared combined cardiac catheterization rates among hospitals and developed a multivariable model to identify hospital characteristics associated with high combined cardiac catheterization rates. A random sample of cases from the 10 hospitals with the highest combined cardiac catheterization rates were reviewed to determine justification, complications, and results of combined cardiac catheterization. RESULTS: Of the 41,180 cardiac catheterizations, 14,177 (34%) were combined procedures. Among hospitals, combined cardiac catheterization rates varied from 2% to 98%. Hospital characteristics associated with high combined cardiac catheterization rates included having a cardiology fellowship program (relative risk [RR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.7), location in eastern Pennsylvania (RR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.8-3.5), and volume of catheterizations performed (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99/100 procedures). For reviewed cases, the most common justification for combined cardiac catheterization was planned revascularization (44%), which is not a specific indication. Only 49% of cases had at least one specific indication for right heart catheterization (range by hospital, 30%-74%). The abnormal findings on the right heart catheterization rarely appeared to change management. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the practice of combined cardiac catheterization, which appears to be related to teaching status and geographic location. The most common justification for the procedure was planned revascularization, which is not one of the specific indications supported by current literature.

Is warfarin underused in the treatment of elderly persons with atrial fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have shown that among patients with atrial fibrillation, warfarin sodium use protects against stroke. Recently, experts have voiced concern about possible underuse of warfarin by practicing physicians. Few studies, however, have quantitated the amount of warfarin underuse. METHODS: We randomly sampled 65 Medicare beneficiaries discharged alive from each of 5 small Pennsylvania hospitals between July 1, 1993, and June 30, 1994, with a discharge diagnosis code for atrial fibrillation. Trained abstractors verified that atrial fibrillation was present at some time during the hospitalization, determined the presence of contraindications to anticoagulation, and identified warfarin or aspirin use at discharge for each patient. An internist used implicit criteria to identify the reason for warfarin nonuse in patients who had none of the explicit contraindications to warfarin and did not receive it. RESULTS: Of 322 charts reviewed, 48 patients were not in atrial fibrillation during the hospitalization, 79 had contraindications to warfarin use, 21 either died or were transferred to another hospital, and 2 were admitted with a complication of warfarin. Of the 172 remaining patients, 76 (44%) underwent anticoagulation. On implicit review of the 96 patients who did not undergo anticoagulation, the internist judged that warfarin would not have been appropriate in 54. After excluding those patients, 76 (64%) of the remaining 118 patients underwent anticoagulation. Patients not receiving warfarin were slightly older (81.6 vs 78.3 years old), but this was not statistically significant after stratifying by hospital. Rates of warfarin use at the 5 hospitals varied widely (32%, 57%, 79%, 82%, 94%; P < .001, chi2 with 4 df). Patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation were not more likely to undergo anticoagulation, nor were patients treated by internal medicine or cardiology specialists. CONCLUSIONS: There may be significant warfarin underuse in some hospitals. Overall, approximately one third of patients with atrial fibrillation for whom it appeared appropriate were not anticoagulated with warfarin. Although the fact that data were not available to or were missed by our review surely justifies some of the underuse, one should recall that even a small amount of underuse may affect a large number of people with this common condition.