Satisfaction and adherence with glatiramer acetate 40mg/mL TIW in RRMS after 12 months, and the effect of switching from 20mg/mL QD.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction with treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has a direct impact on adherence to treatment and, consequently, upon treatment outcomes and costs. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a common method for determining patient satisfaction in MS and other diseases. METHODS: The 12-month, open-label, Phase IV CONFIDENCE study assessed patient satisfaction and treatment adherence, using PROs, as well as safety outcomes in patients with RRMS treated with glatiramer acetate (GA). In the previously reported (Cutter et al., 2019) initial 6-month core phase of the study, patients were randomized to receive three-times-weekly (TIW) GA 40 mg/mL (GA40; n = 431) or once-daily GA 20 mg/mL (GA20; n = 430). In the 6-month, single-arm extension phase, 789 patients completing the core phase were treated with GA40 to determine whether benefits observed in the core phase were sustained during the extension phase, to ascertain if switching from GA20 to GA40 resulted in PRO changes, and to assess safety outcomes. RESULTS: Superior PRO scores for patient satisfaction with treatment, patient perception of treatment convenience, and symptomatic changes (fatigue impact and mental health) observed in the GA40 group versus the GA20 group in the core phase were all maintained in the extension phase. Treatment adherence, significantly greater in the GA40 versus the GA20 group in the core phase, was sustained in patients continuing to receive GA40 in the extension phase, while those who switched from GA20 to GA40 increased their adherence during the extension phase. Safety variables remained consistent throughout the study, with no notable changes observed in patients switching from GA20 to GA40. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the extension phase of the CONFIDENCE study show that the benefits associated with GA40 treatment in terms of medication satisfaction, treatment convenience perception, symptomatic changes in fatigue impact and mental health status, and treatment adherence were maintained over a 12-month observation period. These results confirm the preferential utility of GA40 versus GA20 in clinical practice, with no additional safety concerns associated with switching from GA20 to GA40.

Higher satisfaction and adherence with glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL TIW vs 20 mg/mL QD in RRMS.

BACKGROUND: Patients who perceive their medication to be ineffective or inconvenient are less likely to be adherent to treatment, with potentially significant consequences on long-term clinical outcomes. Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are nonadherent to treatment despite demonstrated efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). While glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone®, Teva Pharmaceuticals) both 20 mg/mL once daily (GA20) and 40 mg/mL three times weekly (GA40) have demonstrated efficacy in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), GA40 has a superior tolerability profile in addition to a more convenient dosing schedule. These characteristics may give rise to greater treatment satisfaction and higher rates of adherence with potentially beneficial effects on clinical outcomes and health-related costs. METHODS: CONFIDENCE was a Phase 4, interventional, open-label, randomized, 2-arm, parallel-group, global study with a duration of 6 months. Patients (N = 861) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive GA20 (n = 430) or GA40 (n = 431) during the core phase. The primary endpoint was patient-reported medication satisfaction using the Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). Secondary endpoints included self-reported convenience perception using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 convenience component, symptomatic changes (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, MFIS), and Mental Health Inventory (MHI). Treatment adherence was measured by Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire. Results from the core phase were included. RESULTS: During the core phase, 857 patients received treatments. Patients on GA40 were statistically significantly more satisfied with their medication than those on GA20 (LSM difference in MSQ, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2, 0.5; p<0.001). Additionally, patients on GA40 found the treatment more convenient (p<0.001), were more adherent (p = 0.002), and reported statistically significant greater improvements in the MFIS Cognitive (p = 0.043) and the MHI Behavior Control (p = 0.014) subscales versus those on GA20. There were no new safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of satisfaction, perception of convenience, and adherence were reported by patients on GA40 than those on GA20. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02499900).

A 12-month prospective, observational study evaluating the impact of disease-modifying treatment on emotional burden in recently-diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients: The POSIDONIA study.

INTRODUCTION: Depression and anxiety are common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and are frequently present at the time of MS diagnosis. METHODS: POSIDONIA was a 12-month, observational, prospective study conducted in Italy to evaluate the impact of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) on emotional burden in patients with recently-diagnosed MS. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), specifically HADS anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) subscale scores, the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) were used to measure patient-reported outcomes. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), HDRS-17, was used as a measure of healthcare provider-reported outcomes. The primary study outcome was change from baseline in feelings of anxiety and depression over 12months (via HADS). RESULTS: Of 250 enrolled patients, 222 (88.8%) completed the study. At baseline, mean HADS total, HADS-A and HADS-D subscale scores were within the normal range. There were no significant changes over time in mean HADS total and HADS-A and HADS-D subscale scores, although the subgroup of patients with baseline scores indicative of anxiety or depression tended to improve over time. Both the HDRS and IES-R total scores improved over time, but there were no statistically significant changes in SF-36. CONCLUSION: In the patient population of the POSIDONIA study depression and anxiety were present in a minority of patients thus not allowing to detect the impact of starting DMT. However DMT appears to have a positive effect in patients with measurable anxiety or depression at baseline.

Efficacy of pegylated lyposomal anthracyclines and of intra-arterial carboplatin and doxorubicin combined with local hyperthermia in a case of malignant endovascular papillary angioendothelioma.

Malignant vascular tumors are exceedingly rare in childhood. Generally, their prognosis is dependent from a microscopically complete surgical resection. We observed the case of a 4-year-old boy affected by malignant endovascular papillary angioendothelioma, a rare vascular tumor of intermediate malignancy, involving all his left leg and partially the pelvis. Its very large size hampered any surgical intervention. However, we could demonstrate high sensitivity of the tumor to lyposomal anthracyclines and the child was eventually cured by the intra-arterial administration of carboplatin and doxorubicin coupled with local hyperthermia. This experience probably represents the first step toward an effective treatment of malignant vascular tumors in infancy.