Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 33(10): 540-548, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pain is an important symptom in wound management, and the choice of treatment directly affects the patient's quality of life. Pain assessment (PA) is essential for quality wound care and, in Italy, mandatory by law. OBJECTIVE: To administer a dedicated learning survey to obtain a better sense of current PA practices, ensure more training, improve procedures, and reduce malpractice. METHODS: A 16-month learning survey of nurses based on a validated questionnaire developed for this project. RESULTS: The survey sample comprised 512 questionnaires. Of respondents, 78% were female, 56.1% were older than 40 years, 94% were RNs, and 6% were wound care specialist nurses. Participants performed a range of dressing changes per week (1-5, 46.3%; 6-20, 34.4%; >21, 19.3%). Although 93% of respondents considered PA important, only 26% recognized it as a vital parameter, and barely one-quarter (25.4%) were aware of current legislation mandating PA. The majority (95.3%) believed that PA is not consistent with pain perceived by the patient. Further, 87.3% stated that they did not have adequate knowledge to conduct a PA, 91.4% did not consider themselves up-to-date on PA, and 81% did not document PA results. However, specific wound care training leads to significantly better PA (P < .001): 71.9% of wound care specialist nurses recognized pain as a vital parameter, and 59.4% were aware of current legislation regarding PA; further, 81.3% consistently evaluated pain, 59.4% documented PA results, and 50% communicated the outcome to the physician in charge. CONCLUSIONS: The results illustrate the lack of sensitivity, training, and education that Italian RNs have regarding PA in wound care.


Subject(s)
Bandages/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/nursing , Pain Measurement/nursing , Wounds and Injuries/nursing , Adult , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Quality of Life , Wound Healing/physiology
2.
Prof Inferm ; 70(4): 206-213, 2017.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29460557

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The error in medicine has long been discussed in scientific debates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the degree knowledge, attitude and behavior of students in Nursing for the failure in the health sector. METHODS: It was administered to 231 students of Nursing of the Sapienza University of Rome (171 females and 60 males), aged between 21 and 45 years, a structured questionnaire in three questions that explore the experiences and opinions about the errors found in medical practice, the causes underlying them and the mistakes that should never be committed. Data were collected, stratified by sex, age, marital status, and analyzed using the χ2 test. Significance was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: The 5 errors found more frequently in clinical practice by the students were the following: Errors that favors the onset of hospital infections (58.9%); Non adherence to protocols (50.2%); Patient care (45.9%); Errors due to the administration of therapies and drugs (45.9%); Errors relating to the execution of withdrawals (35.9%). The five cases considered most frequently responsible for such errors were: the rush (70.1%), followed by neglect / superficial (55%); disorganization (51.5%); not hygienically / infertility (50.6%) and inattention (42.9%). With regard to the errors that you should never commit, students have shown more frequently: the errors of administration of therapies / medications (69.3%); errors of prescription therapies / medications (58.9%); errors related to surgery (52.8%); the exchange of patient or misidentification of the patient (50.6%); errors that favor the occurrence of hospital infections (48.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study shows the importance of a culture of error in medicine, also as part of undergraduate education, in order to train and educate future health professionals to this issue in order to promoting patient safety and quality of health.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Medical Errors , Students, Nursing , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rome , Young Adult
3.
Clin Immunol ; 125(1): 30-3, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17692572

ABSTRACT

Rituximab at 375 mg/m(2) x 4 is effective for refractory HCV-related mixed cryoglobulinemia. We conducted a pilot study to assess the efficacy of a lower dosage, 250 mg/m(2) x 2. Six consecutive patients with mixed cryoglobulinemia were treated. All patients had severe or life-threatening disease manifestations, including necrotizing skin ulcers, renal disease, hyperviscosity or intestinal vasculitis. Four of five evaluable patients (excluding one early death) had >80% decrease of cryocrit and remission of vasculitis at the end of a 22- to 55-week (median 40) follow-up. The non-responder failed to respond to additional rituximab treatment, suggesting intrinsic resistance rather than insufficient dosage as the cause of treatment failure. No sustained increase of HCV viremia after rituximab was observed. Rituximab at 250 mg/m(2) x 2 may be as effective as at 375 mg/m(2) x 4 for treating mixed cryoglobulinemia. Larger studies are required to assess the efficacy of low-dose rituximab.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Cryoglobulinemia/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived , Cryoglobulinemia/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Hepatitis C/complications , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Rituximab , Shock, Septic/etiology , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...