Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Lidocaine , Humans , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Male , Female , Anesthesia, Conduction/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Middle AgedABSTRACT
To compare and assess silicone membrane-based sub-Tenon's block (STB) simulator and animal eye model (goat's eye) for practicing STB in terms of anatomical similarity and feel of texture of eye layers. The study included 34 participants (26 learners and 8 consultants) from tertiary ophthalmic centres. The participants were divided into groups A and B. Group A performed STB on the goat's eyes before using the silicone membrane simulator. Group B performed STB on the simulator and further proceeded to the goat's eye. Participants had to rate the anatomical similarity and feel of the texture for the simulator model on a scale of 0-10 and share their preference between the two models. In group A, the scores given to the simulator model and the feel of texture of layers were 8.05 ± 0.88 and 7.97 ± 1.07, respectively, and the scores given to the animal model and the feel of texture of layers were 8.11 ± 0.97 and 8.21 ± 0.88, respectively. Group B participants scored the simulator model and feel of texture of layers with 8.13 ± 0.95 and 8.25 ± 0.99, respectively. Overall, 89% participants preferred the simulator; the reasons included ease of usage, helpful warning system, absence of biological waste, and facility for repeatable training. The study validated anatomical accuracy, preference, and ability of usage of the STB simulator. For broader usage, further study involving higher number of participants is recommended.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local , Anesthetics, Local , Animals , SiliconesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The main aim of the study was to determine whether intravenous sedation with midazolam reduces the ability of patients to see during cataract surgery performed under topical anaesthesia. We also sought to determine the effects of sedation on patient's level of disturbance to the microscope light and visualization of surgical instruments and on the overall of experience of the patients during surgery. METHODS: A total of 78 patients, aged 40-75 years, were randomly divided into two groups: Group S, (sedation) who received intravenous midazolam 0.015 mg/kg, and Group NS, (no sedation) who did not receive midazolam. Patients with history of anxiety, those with history of intraocular surgery and those with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Topical anaesthesia was achieved by the application of 2% xylocaine gel over the conjunctiva. A blinded observer interviewed all the patients 30 min after the surgery using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: Significant number of patients (25.6%) in Group NS was disturbed a lot because of the microscope light compared to Group S (5.1%), p = 0.021. Also, statistically significant number of patients in Group S (48.7%) compared to Group NS (20.5%) was not sure about the images perceived during surgery and were unable to recollect them after the surgery, p = 0.008, and 12.8% of the patients in Group NS reported the visual experience as frightening compared to 2.6% of patients in Group S, p = 0.239. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that intravenous midazolam reduces both the ability to see and recall intraoperative visual images in patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia.
