ABSTRACT
In India, Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) generally work with ENT surgeons and use a variety of treatment approaches, service delivery methods, feedback modes, and outcome measures in clinical practice while dealing with voice disorders. The practice preferences of the SLPs are based on theoretical and practical exposure during their graduate course, guidance from professional bodies, evidence-based practices, etc. The facilities in the work setting also determine the practice style of the SLP. This study reports information on demographics of the SLPs, nature of patients served, intervention methods, and evidence-based practices followed by the SLPs via an E-survey. Analysis of the survey from 55 SLPs in India, who work in the area of voice revealed that most SLPs had postgraduate (67.27%; n = 37) and doctorate degree (23.63%; n = 13) and worked in medical-related settings (81.81%; n = 45). Therapeutic approaches were practiced as stated in literature by 43.64% (n = 24) of SLPs. Although 56.36% (n = 31) of SLPs modified therapeutic approaches based on the client's needs (75%), literacy (16.66%) and cultural variations (8.33%). Attending Continuing Education Programs and training workshops were required to practice voice. Voice therapy methods (protocols) used by the SLPs were not uniform across India. The development of an indigenous protocol/method for voice therapy is the need of the hour.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) is a standardized instrument used in voice assessment to assess voice quality. It has been translated and culturally adapted in several languages. This study aimed at developing and validating a Tamil version of CAPE-V through auditory perceptual evaluation of remotely recorded voice samples. METHOD: The Tamil version was adapted with permission from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association to match the rationale in English CAPE-V. The sentences were constructed by the first author and validated for content by two panels of experts. Forty-five participants (15 cases and 30 controls) were included in the study. Data recording was conducted online (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., app) for all samples. Three raters participated in the auditory evaluation and scored all samples using Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain (GRBAS) scale followed by CAPE-V with a week gap in between. Twenty percent of samples were repeated to assess intrarater reliability. The intrarater and interrater reliability measures for Tamil CAPE-V were established using intraclass coefficients (ICCs). To ensure construct validity, group differences were determined between the cases and controls. The concurrent validity was established by correlating Tamil CAPE-V with the GRBAS scale. RESULTS: The intrarater reliability for Tamil CAPE-V ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC: .610-.998). The Tamil CAPE-V obtained moderate to good interrater reliability for all parameters (ICC: .525-.790) except pitch (ICC: .405). The differences between the cases and controls were statistically significant (p < .01). The correlation between CAPE-V and GRBAS was strong for overall severity, breathiness, and strain (r s = .725-.861) and moderate for roughness (r s = .678). CONCLUSION: The Tamil CAPE-V is a reliable and valid tool for auditory perceptual evaluation in Tamil-speaking populations. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21513885.
Subject(s)
Dysphonia , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , India , Observer Variation , Voice Quality , Speech Production Measurement , Speech AcousticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) is a widely used perceptual evaluation scale for voice assessment. It is adapted in many regional languages worldwide. This systematic review will help critically evaluate the methodologies used to adapt and establish CAPE-V as a valid and reliable tool. METHOD: Authors reviewed literature in search engines (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed) to identify studies published in English between 2002-2020. The CAPE-V translated and adapted for linguistic or cultural variations were included for the review. The studies were compiled using the Mendeley Reference Manager and screened for title/abstract before shortlisting the studies. RESULTS: The initial database had 3459 search results and after duplicates removal, 1535 articles were analysed. Thirteen studies were narrowed based on title/abstract screening. A final of ten studies were selected for the review. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This review provided a comprehensive understanding of the challenges encountered during cross-cultural adaptation and will help future researchers choose a suitable adaptation method.
