Safety of propofol in cirrhotic patients undergoing colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: results of a prospective controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Safety of propofol sedation in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing colonoscopy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains to be studied. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of propofol is safe for endoscopic procedures more complex than gastroscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis in a prospective controlled study. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen consecutive patients, with or without cirrhosis, who underwent colonoscopy or ERCP with propofol sedation were recruited between January and June 2009. Administration of sedation was performed by anesthesiologists and outcome measures were recorded. Main outcomes were complication rates and recovery times. RESULTS: Sixty-one (28.5%) cirrhotic patients and 153 (71.5%) noncirrhotic patients were included. The incidence of sedation-related complications did not significantly differ between the two populations (11.5 vs. 17.0%, respectively, P=0.31). The mean (±SD) dose of propofol administered (213±86 vs. 239±100 mg, P=0.07), the mean time to achieve adequate sedation (3.3±1.1 vs. 3.0±1.2 min, P=0.21), the mean total duration of the endoscopic procedure (24.5±10.6 vs. 27.4±11.8 min, P=0.08), the mean time to reach Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale 5 (17.2±4.4 vs. 18.4±5.6 min, P=0.15), the mean time from completion of the procedure to release (9.0±2.5 vs. 9.1±3.2 min, P=0.86), and the mean time to full recovery (42.2±7.3 vs. 42.3±7.8 min, P=0.88) were very similar between the two groups. The limitation of this study was lack of randomization, and a control group of cirrhotic patients using standard sedation with benzodiazepines and opioids. CONCLUSION: Propofol deep sedation administered by an anesthesiologist with appropriate monitorings seems to be a safe procedure during colonoscopy or ERCP in cirrhotic patients.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: influence on portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a routine treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Whether TACE influences the degree of portal hypertension remains uncertain. AIM AND PATIENTS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of 283 TACE to investigate the incidence of variceal bleeding and ascites after the procedure. We also prospectively evaluated portal pressure by hepatic venous portal gradient (HVPG) before and within 3 days by TACE in a group of 15 patients. RESULTS: Before TACE, esophageal varices were present in 125 patients. Variceal bleeding occurred in three (1.5%) and ascites in two (1%) patients during the follow-up post-TACE. Patients with variceal bleeding were significantly older (P=0.019). In 15 patients who underwent portal pressure measurement before and within 3 days by TACE, HVPG was unchanged (mean 13.1 vs. 12.8 mmHg, P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In our series portal hypertension-related complications after TACE were rare and did not result in higher mortality. As TACE did not influence HVPG, the preventive ligation of esophageal varices before TACE does not seem justified.

Application of the model for end-stage liver disease score for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites and renal impairment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can manage severe complications of portal hypertension. The Mayo Clinic group proposed a so-called model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) to predict survival in cirrhotic patients. High creatinine levels determine a decrease in calculated survival chances with MELD but functional renal disease can be reversed by TIPS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MELD in predicting survival after TIPS, particularly in patients with refractory ascites associated with functional renal failure. METHODS: This retrospective analysis examines 68 cirrhotic patients who underwent elective TIPS: 48 patients had refractory ascites and 20 patients had recurrent variceal bleeding. Multivariate analysis was used to establish predictive parameters of survival after TIPS. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare survival rates observed in our patients with those evaluated with the MELD score. RESULTS: The age of patients was the only variable shown to have an independent value in predicting survival after TIPS. In patients undergoing shunting for refractory ascites, the survival rates at 6, 12 and 24 months after the procedure were significantly higher than expected with the MELD score. CONCLUSIONS: The MELD scale may underestimate the efficacy of TIPS in end-stage cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites and functional kidney dysfunction. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding and ultimately to assess a correction factor to better predict survival after TIPS in patients with functional renal impairment.

Effects of long-term Irbesartan in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients: comparison with propranolol in a randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The role of angiotensin II (AT-II) type I receptor antagonists in the treatment of portal hypertension remains controversial. We tested the efficacy of Irbesartan (Irb) vs. Propranolol (Pro) in reducing portal pressure and evaluated its systemic haemodynamic effects. METHODS: Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive either Irb 300 mg/day (19 patients) or Pro 40-120 mg/day (15 patients) for 2 months. RESULTS: Irb was discontinued in five patients (26%). No major side effect occurred in the Pro group. On an average, the portal pressure gradient decreased significantly more in the Pro than in the Irb group (median -19.5%, range -11/-31% vs. -4.8%, +2.5/-10%, P<0.001). A clinically significant decrease was seen in one (7%) of the patients given Irb vs. five (33%) given Pro (P<0.02). The fall in mean arterial pressure was significantly higher with Irb than with Pro (median -29%, range -15/-45% vs. -4.9%, +8/-19%, P<0.02). Irb significantly modified the blood creatinine clearance (median -29 ml/m, range +9/-61 ml/m, -30, -24/-35% P<0.0001 vs. basal). CONCLUSIONS: Irb offers no advantage over Pro in the control of portal hypertension. Moreover, its therapeutic profile is limited by important side effects.

Renal failure in cirrhotic patients: role of terlipressin in clinical approach to hepatorenal syndrome type 2.

OBJECTIVES: Renal failure secondary to hepatorenal syndrome or to organic renal disease occurs frequently in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. The present prospective study investigates the usefulness of terlipressin in both the diagnostic and the therapeutic approach to cirrhotics with renal failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were studied: 11 with hepatorenal syndrome type 2 (group 1) and five with organic renal disease (group 2). All received terlipressin (1 mg/4 h intravenously) for 7 days. Subsequently, 12 patients (nine from group 1 and three from group 2) underwent a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. RESULTS: Terlipressin significantly improved renal function (serum creatinine, 1.8 +/- 0.8 versus 2.4 +/- 0.9 mg/dl; blood creatinine clearance, 53 +/- 8 versus 21.3 +/- 8.7 ml/min; P < 0.05) in group 1 [8/11 patients (73%) versus 1/5 (20%) of group 2; P < 0.05]. The only patient in group 2 who responded to terlipressin had a mixed renal dysfunction. Renal function improved significantly after transjugular portosystemic shunt in all patients who responded to terlipressin. CONCLUSIONS: Terlipressin administration significantly improves renal function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome type 2 but not in organic kidney failure. By providing the critical information that a patient's kidney function is (or is not) reversible, a trial with terlipressin may be useful when selecting cirrhotic patients with renal failure as candidates for a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation.