Bioequivalence of HX575 (recombinant human epoetin alfa) and a comparator epoetin alfa after multiple intravenous administrations: an open-label randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: HX575 is a human recombinant epoetin alfa that was approved for use in Europe in 2007 under the European Medicines Agency biosimilar approval pathway. Therefore, in order to demonstrate the bioequivalence of HX575 to an existing epoetin alfa, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to steady state circulating concentrations of HX575 and a comparator epoetin alfa were compared following multiple intravenous administrations. METHODS: An open, randomised, parallel group study was conducted in 80 healthy adult males. Subjects were randomised to multiple intravenous doses of 100 IU/kg body weight of HX575 or of the comparator epoetin alfa three-times-weekly for four weeks. Serum epoetin concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and pharmacokinetic parameters for the two treatments were compared. The time course and area under the effect curve ratio of haematological characteristics were used as surrogate parameters for efficacy evaluation. RESULTS: The haematological profiles of both treatments were similar, as determined from their population mean curves and the AUECHb ratio and 90% confidence interval (99.9% [98.5-101.2%]), the primary pharmacodynamic endpoint of this study. The pharmacokinetic parameters after the treatments showed minor differences after single dosing, but not at steady state doses. After multiple doses, HX575 was bioequivalent to the comparator with respect to the rate and extent of exposure of exogenous epoetin (AUCtau ratio and 90% confidence interval: 89.2% [82.5-96.2%]). Study medication was well tolerated with no clinically relevant differences between safety profiles of the treatments. Anti-epoetin antibodies were not detected. CONCLUSION: HX575 and the comparator epoetin alfa were bioequivalent at steady state circulating drug concentrations with respect to their pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacodynamic action. This supports the conclusion that HX575 and the comparator epoetin alfa, when administered intraveneously, will be equally efficacious and may be interchangeable as therapy.

Bioequivalence of HX575 (recombinant human epoetin alfa) and a comparator epoetin alfa after multiple subcutaneous administrations.

AIM: To compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of two erythropoesis-stimulating agents (ESA), HX575 (Binocrit, Sandoz GmbH, Holzkirchen, Germany), human recombinant epoetin alfa approved as the first biosimilar ESA, and a comparator epoetin alfa, following multiple subcutaneous administrations. METHODS: An open, randomized, parallel group study was conducted in 80 healthy adult males. Subjects were randomized to multiple subcutaneous doses of 100 IU/kg body weight of HX575 or of the comparator epoetin alfa 3 times weekly for 4 weeks. RESULTS: The hematological profiles of both treatments were similar, as determined from the population mean curves and area under the effect curve (AUEC) ratios. HX575 met the predefined biosimilarity criteria with respect to the ratio and 90% confidence interval of the AUEC(Hb) (98.9% [97.7-100.2%]), the primary PD endpoint. The PK of the two treatments were also similar as shown by the AUC(0-48) ratios and 90% confidence intervals, 94.3% [84.7-105.0%] and 96.9% [88.2-106.5%], respectively. Study medication was well tolerated and neutralizing anti-epoetin antibodies were not detected. CONCLUSIONS: HX575 and the comparator epoetin alfa were bioequivalent with respect to their PK/PD, supporting the conclusion that both, when administered subcutaneously, will be equally efficacious and may be interchangeable as therapy.

Proof of systemic safety of a lidocaine ointment in the treatment of patients with anorectal pain.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to demonstrate that repeated anorectal administration of a 5% lidocaine ointment (CAS 137-58-6; LidoPosterine Salbe, Posterisan akut Rektalsalbe) in the treatment of patients with acute anorectal pain does not result in systemically efficacious plasma concentrations of lidocaine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open single-center study 24 male or female patients with anorectal pain due to hemorrhoids, anal fissures, fistulas or proctitis administered lidocaine ointment as a single anorectal dose (2.5 g ointment corresponding to 125 mg lidocaine) followed by repeated administration (2.5 g ointment t.i.d.) for 4 days. Safety evaluation was performed with respect to plasma concentrations of lidocaine, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), physical findings and adverse events. Blood samples were drawn prior to the first single administration and at 13 time points over the first 24 h in order to create a pharmacokinetic profile. Blood samples were also drawn prior to administration of the last dose on day 5 and thereafter using the identical time points for blood sampling as on day 1. Vital signs and ECG were recorded immediately before and 1 and 4 h after the first and last administration, respectively. Adverse events and skin tolerability were also recorded at predefined times during the study period. RESULTS: After a single dose of 125 mg lidocaine the average extent of exposure in terms of the AUC(tau,sd) during a 6 h dosage interval amounted to 397.7 ng/ml x h (geometric mean). C(max,sd) reached a mean value of 131.8 ng/ml (geometric mean). Only a minor accumulation of the lidocaine plasma concentrations was observed after multiple dose application. The geometric mean of the AUC(tau,md) (503.8 ng/ml x h, tau = 6 h) and the geometric mean of C(max,md) (145.9 ng/ml) were slightly higher than the corresponding single dose values. The AUC accumulation ratio was calculated as 127% (90% CI: 108-148%) and the C(max) accumulation ratio reached 120% (90% CI: 101-139%). Plasma peak concentrations of lidocaine in all subjects remained with a sufficient safety margin below the minimal effective therapeutic plasma concentration (1.5 microg/ml) as well as by an order of magnitude below toxic concentrations (5 microg/ml). There were neither unexpected, serious nor severe adverse events. There were no clinically relevant findings with respect to vital signs and ECG. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated anorectal administration of a 5% lidocaine ointment proved to be safe with respect to systemic plasma concentrations of lidocaine and vital signs.