Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy Administered Every 2 Months is Cost-Effective for the Treatment of HIV-1 in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Current antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) have improved outcomes for people living with HIV. However, the requirement to adhere to lifelong daily oral dosing may be challenging for some people living with HIV, leading to suboptimal adherence and therefore reduced treatment effectiveness. Treatment with long-acting (LA) ART may improve adherence and health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) LA administered every 2 months (Q2M) compared with current ART administered as daily oral single-tablet regimens (STRs) from a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. METHODS: A hybrid decision-tree and Markov state-transition model was used with pooled data from three phase III/IIIb trials (FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M) over a lifetime horizon, with health states defined by viral load and CD4+ cell count. Direct costs (in €) were taken from Spanish public sources from 2021 and several deterministic and probabilistic analyses were carried out. An annual 3% discount rate was applied to both costs and utilities. RESULTS: Over the lifetime horizon, CAB+RPV LA Q2M was associated with an additional 0.27 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and slightly greater lifetime costs (€4003) versus daily oral ART, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €15,003/QALY, below the commonly accepted €30,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold in Spain. All scenario analyses showed consistent results, and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed cost-effectiveness compared with daily oral STRs in 62.4% of simulations, being dominant in 0.3%. CONCLUSION: From the Spanish National Health System perspective, CAB+RPV LA Q2M is a cost-effective alternative compared with the current options of daily oral STR regimens for HIV treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ATLAS, NCT02951052; ATLAS-2M, NCT03299049; FLAIR, NCT02938520.

Over the past decades, treatments for HIV infection have improved outcomes for people living with HIV. However, most of the treatments available consist of daily oral administration, which may present challenges for some people. These challenges may lead to a less optimal intake of the medicines and, therefore, to a potential reduction of treatment effectiveness. A new long-acting treatment alternative for HIV with two drugs is now available: cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting is the first injectable treatment administered in the muscle every 2 months by a healthcare professional. Long-acting injectables may improve treatment administration and health-related quality of life of people living with HIV. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting in Spain compared with daily oral single-tablet treatment for HIV. An economic model using clinical data and Spanish inputs was used to estimate cost-effectiveness and health outcomes over a lifetime. Cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting compared with daily oral single-tablet treatment showed an increase in health-related quality of life, leading to a cost-effectiveness ratio of €15,003, below the Spanish willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000. All different scenarios tested showed consistent results, with cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting being cost-effective in 62.4% of the simulations and less costly and more effective in 0.3%. This study demonstrated that, in Spain, cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting administered every 2 months is a cost-effective alternative to the current daily oral single-tablet treatment options for HIV.

Importance of adherence to treatment with direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C. / Importancia de la adherencia al tratamiento de la hepatitis C con antivirales de acción directa.

The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and the implementation of the National Strategic Plan has extended the spectrum of patients suitable for treatment to include practically all affected individuals. There has been a change in patient profile. Most patients are previously untreated, with lesser awareness of the disease, and taking polymedication, and are often under treatment with opioid replacement therapy, are active drug users or have psychiatric comorbidities. This article reviews the most important factors determining the degree of treatment adherence, in particular, drug therapy complexity, the adverse effects of DAA, demographic factors (age, ethnic group, sex, educational level, marital status) and psychosocial factors (beliefs, motivation to take therapy and negative attitude to therapy), as well as the doctor-patient relationship, knowledge/awareness of the disease, and finally comorbidities and drug abuse or abuse of other substances such as alcohol. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled "The value of simplicity in hepatitis C treatment", which is sponsored by Gilead. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a or peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in Spain

BACKGROUND: An independent meta-analysis of randomized comparative trials of peginterferons alfa-2a and alfa-2b, both combined with ribavirin, analyzed the probability of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a (180 Mug/week) plus ribavirin (800-1200mg/day) vs. alfa-2b (1.5 Mug/kg/week) plus ribavirin (800-1400 mg/day), from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with 7 health states to simulate lifetime disease progression. SVR was calculated from the meta-analysis data. Transition probabilities and health state utilities were obtained from published literature. Direct healthcare costs were obtained from the drug catalog, while costs of disease-related complications were obtained from published studies and healthcare cost database. Costs were expressed in 2010(Euro). The annual discount rate applied was 3.5% for both costs and benefits. RESULTS: SVR rate for treatment with alfa-2a was higher than with alfa-2b; the differences were 6.0%, 7.6% and 8.7% for all genotypes, genotypes 1/4 and genotypes 2/3, respectively. Each patient would gain 0.469, 0.600 and 0.685 life-years and 0.155, 0.198 and 0.227 quality-adjusted life-years with alfa-2a vs. alfa-2b, for the respective genotypes. The cost saving per patient treated with alfa-2a would be (Euro)705, (Euro)672 and (Euro)1900, for all genotypes and for genotypes 1/4 and 2/3, respectively, alfa-2a being dominant. CONCLUSIONS: According to the present model, treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a is cost-effective compared with peginterferon alfa-2b, both combined with ribavirin

ANTECEDENTES: se analizó las probabilidades de respuesta virológica sostenida (RVS) a través de un metaanálisis independiente que comprendía ensayos comparativos aleatorizados con interferón pegilado alfa-2a y alfa-2b, ambos en combinación con ribavirina. OBJETIVO: estimar la relación coste-efectividad del tratamiento a largo plazo de pacientes con hepatitis crónica C mediante interferón pegilado alfa-2a (1180 mig/semana) más ribavirina (800-1200mg/día) frente al interferón pegilado alfa-2b (1,5 mig/kg/kg/semana) más ribavirina (800-1400mg/día), desde la perspectiva del sistema nacional sanitario español. MÉTODOS: se desarrolló un modelo de Markov con 7 estados de salud para simular la evolución de la enfermedad a lo largo de la vida. La SVR se calculó a partir de los datos del metaanálisis. Las probabilidades de transición y las utilidades de los estados de salud se obtuvieron de la literatura publicada. Los costes sanitarios directos se obtuvieron a partir del catálogo de medicamentos, mientras que los costes de las complicaciones relacionadas con la enfermedad se obtuvieron a partir de los estudios publicados y de la base de datos de costes sanitarios. Los costes se expresaron en euros de 2010. La tasa anual de descuento aplicada fue del 3,5% para los costes y los beneficios. RESULTADOS: la tasa de RVS para el tratamiento con alfa-2a fue superior que con alfa-2b; las diferencias fueron del 6,0%, 7,6% y 8,7% para todos los genotipos, genotipos 1/4 y genotipos 2/3, respectivamente. Cada paciente ganaría 0,469, 0,600 y 0,685 años/vida y 0,155, 0,198 y 0,227 años/vida ajustados por calidad con alfa-2a respecto a alfa-2b, para los respectivos genotipos. El ahorro en costes por paciente tratado con alfa-2a sería de (Euro)705, (Euro)672 y (Euro)1900, para todos los genotipos y genotipos 1/4 y 2/3, respectivamente, siendo alfa-2a dominante. CONCLUSIONES: de acuerdo con el modelo presentado, el tratamiento de pacientes con hepatitis C crónica con interferón pegilado alfa-2a presentan mejor relación coste-efectividad en comparación con el interferón pegilado alfa-2b, ambos combinados con la ribavirina

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a or peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in Spain.

BACKGROUND: An independent meta-analysis of randomized comparative trials of peginterferons alfa-2a and alfa-2b, both combined with ribavirin, analyzed the probability of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a (180µg/week) plus ribavirin (800-1200mg/day) vs. alfa-2b (1.5µg/kg/week) plus ribavirin (800-1400mg/day), from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with 7 health states to simulate lifetime disease progression. SVR was calculated from the meta-analysis data. Transition probabilities and health state utilities were obtained from published literature. Direct healthcare costs were obtained from the drug catalog, while costs of disease-related complications were obtained from published studies and healthcare cost database. Costs were expressed in 2010€. The annual discount rate applied was 3.5% for both costs and benefits. RESULTS: SVR rate for treatment with alfa-2a was higher than with alfa-2b; the differences were 6.0%, 7.6% and 8.7% for all genotypes, genotypes 1/4 and genotypes 2/3, respectively. Each patient would gain 0.469, 0.600 and 0.685 life-years and 0.155, 0.198 and 0.227 quality-adjusted life-years with alfa-2a vs. alfa-2b, for the respective genotypes. The cost saving per patient treated with alfa-2a would be €705, €672 and €1900, for all genotypes and for genotypes 1/4 and 2/3, respectively, alfa-2a being dominant. CONCLUSIONS: According to the present model, treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a is cost-effective compared with peginterferon alfa-2b, both combined with ribavirin.