Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 5: 193, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30697541

ABSTRACT

The effect of aortic baroreceptor stimulation on blood pressure manipulation was assessed using the goat species Capra aegagrus hircus. The aim of this study was to manipulate blood pressure with future intention to treat high blood pressure in humans. The ages of the animals ranged from 6 months to 2 years. A standard anesthesia protocol was used. A lateral thoracotomy was performed to gain access to the aortic arch. Data was collected with the Vigileo system. Pre stimulation blood pressure was compared with maximum post stimulation blood pressure values. Results were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. In the study 38 animals were enrolled. Baroreceptor stimulation was performed for each animal using 3 different electrodes each of which emits an electrical impulse. In the pilot phase of the study, the median baseline blood pressure prior to stimulation of the baroreceptors was 110.8 mmHg. After stimulation the median blood pressure decreased to 88 mmHg. The average decrease in blood pressure was 22.8 mmHg. This decrease of blood pressure after stimulation of the baroreceptors is statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and the proof of concept was shown. During the extended phase all three probes had a significant effect on blood pressure lowering (p < 0.0001). The study confirmed that aortic baroreceptor stimulation has an effect on blood pressure lowering. This is a novel field of blood pressure manipulation. The hemodynamic effects of long-term aortic baroreceptor stimulation are unknown. Further investigations need to be done to determine whether a similar effect can be induced in different species such as primates and humans.

2.
J S Afr Vet Assoc ; 88(0): e1-e7, 2017 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29227141

ABSTRACT

Although porcupine quill injuries are common in dogs, the detailed appearance of the quill on diagnostic ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging has not been sufficiently described. A 4-year-old, intact, female Jack Russel terrier presented with severe neck pain and ataxia after an altercation with a porcupine 2 weeks earlier. Radiology, diagnostic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were all utilised to identify a quill imbedded in the cervical vertebral canal and cervical musculature and were compared to each other. Surgical removal of the quill, guided by imaging findings, led to the resolution of the clinical signs in the patient. Previous ultrasound imaging reports have just stated that the quill consists of paralell hyperechoic lines, and do not mention the finer hyperechoic lines inbetween and do not try to provide a reason for the appearance. Previous computed tomography (CT) reports just mention identifying the quill on CT images (whether or not CT could identify the fragments), but do not go into detail about the attenuating appearance of the quill nor try to relate this to the composition of the quill. This is to the authors' knowledge the first report with detailed imaging descriptions of a case of cranial cervical vertebral canal porcupine quill foreign body in a dog. This is also the first report to allude to a possible difference in imaging findings related to quill structure because of keratin orientation and melanin content. The ideal imaging modality to use remains elusive, but ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging could all identify the quill.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Dogs/injuries , Foreign Bodies/veterinary , Wounds and Injuries/veterinary , Animals , Ataxia/etiology , Ataxia/veterinary , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Female , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/veterinary , Mandibular Injuries , Neck Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Neck Muscles/injuries , Neck Pain/etiology , Neck Pain/veterinary , Porcupines , Spinal Canal/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Canal/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/veterinary , Ultrasonography/veterinary , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/surgery
3.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 41(4): 411-20, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24576259

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the anaesthetic, analgesic and cardiorespiratory effects of intramuscular (IM) medetomidine and ketamine administered alone or combined with morphine or tramadol, for orchiectomy in cats. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised, blinded, prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Thirty client-owned cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cats (n = 10 in each group) received a combination of medetomidine (60 µgkg(-1) ) and ketamine (10 mg kg(-1) ) alone (MedK); combined with morphine (0.2 mg kg(-1) ) (MedKM), or combined with tramadol (2 mg kg(-1) ) (MedKT) IM. Time of induction, surgical and recovery events were recorded, and physiological parameters measured and recorded. Analgesia was evaluated with a visual analogue scale, a composite scoring system and the von Frey mechanical threshold device, every hour from three to eight hours post-drug administration injection. Data were analyzed with a linear mixed model, Kruskal-Wallis or Chi-square tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Median (IQR) induction and recovery times (minutes) were not significantly (p = 0.125) different between groups: 5.6 (2.7-8.0), 7.4 (5.1-9.6) and 8.0 (5.8-14.9) for induction and 128.5 (95.1-142.8), 166.4 (123.1-210.0) and 142.9 (123.4-180.2) for recovery, with MedK, MedKT and MedKM, respectively. Two cats (MedKM) required alfaxalone for endotracheal intubation. In all groups, three or four cats required additional isoflurane for surgery. Arterial oxygen tension overall (mean ± SD: 66 ± 2 mmHg) was low. Surgery resulted in increased systolic arterial blood pressure (p < 0.001), haemoglobin saturation (p < 0.001), respiratory (p = 0.003) and heart rates (p = 0.002). Pain scores did not differ significantly between groups. Von Frey responses decreased over time; changes over time varied by treatment (p < 0.001), MedK returning to baseline values more rapidly than MedKM and MedKT. No cat required rescue analgesics. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All three protocols can provide adequate anaesthesia and analgesia for orchiectomy in cats. However, rescue intervention to maintain surgical anaesthesia may be required in some cats. Oxygen supplementation is advised.


Subject(s)
Cats , Ketamine/pharmacology , Medetomidine/pharmacology , Morphine/pharmacology , Orchiectomy/veterinary , Tramadol/pharmacology , Analgesia/veterinary , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Combined/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Dissociative/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Dissociative/pharmacology , Animals , Carbon Dioxide/blood , Drug Combinations , Drug Therapy, Combination , Injections, Intramuscular , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Male , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Orchiectomy/adverse effects , Oxygen/blood , Pain/prevention & control , Pain/veterinary , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...