Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(20)2022 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36291788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of active neoplastic disease was traditionally judged an absolute contraindication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) because of the fear of tumor cells being scattered or seeded. The aim of this study is to compare the number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) before and after surgery in patients receiving lung cancer resection with and without intraoperative ECMO support. METHODS: This is a prospective, non-randomized, two-arms observational study comparing the number of CTCs before and after surgery in patients receiving lung cancer resection with and without intraoperative ECMO support. The ECMO arm includes patients suffering from lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection with planned intraoperative ECMO support. The non-ECMO arm includes patients suffering from non-early-stage lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection without planned intraoperative ECMO support. RESULTS: Twenty patients entered the study, eight in the ECMO arm and twelve in the non-ECMO arm. We did not observe any significant difference between the ECMO and non-ECMO groups in terms of postoperative complications (p = 1.00), ICU stay (p = 0.30), hospital stay (p = 0.23), circulating tumor cells' increase or decrease after surgery (p = 0.24), and postoperative C-reactive protein and C-reactive protein increase (p = 0.80). The procedures in the non-ECMO arm were significantly longer than those in the ECMO arm (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ECMO for lung cancer resections did not impact CTC increase or decrease after the procedure.

2.
Lancet Oncol ; 22(5): 597-608, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33845035

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial on electron intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT), accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the use of intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) than whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Here, we aimed to examine the planned long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from the ELIOT trial. METHODS: This single-centre, randomised, phase 3 equivalence trial was done at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Eligible women, aged 48-75 years with a clinical diagnosis of a unicentric breast carcinoma with an ultrasound diameter not exceeding 25 mm, clinically negative axillary lymph nodes, and who were suitable for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, with a random permuted block design (block size of 16) and stratified by clinical tumour size, to receive post-operative WBI with conventional fractionation (50 Gy given as 25 fractions of 2 Gy, plus a 10 Gy boost), or 21 Gy intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) in a single dose to the tumour bed during surgery. The trial was open label and no-one was masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IBTR. The trial was designed assuming a 5-year IBTR rate of 3% in the WBI group and equivalence of the two groups, if the 5-year IBTR rate in the ELIOT group did not exceed a 2·5 times excess, corresponding to 7·5%. Overall survival was the secondary endpoint. The main analysis was done by intention to treat. The cumulative incidence of IBTR events and overall survival were assessed at 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01849133. FINDINGS: Between Nov 20, 2000, and Dec 27, 2007, 1305 women were enrolled and randomly assigned: 654 to the WBI group and 651 to the ELIOT group. After a median follow-up of 12·4 years (IQR 9·7-14·7), 86 (7%) patients developed IBTR, with 70 (11%) cases in the ELIOT group and 16 (2%) in the WBI group, corresponding to an absolute excess of 54 IBTRs in the ELIOT group (HR 4·62, 95% CI 2·68-7·95, p<0·0001). In the ELIOT group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 4·2% (95% CI 2·8-5·9), the 10-year rate was 8·1% (6·1-10·3), and the 15-year rate was 12·6% (9·8-15·9). In the WBI group, the 5-year IBTR rate was 0·5% (95% CI 0·1-1·3), the 10-year rate was 1·1% (0·5-2·2), and the 15-year rate was 2·4% (1·4-4·0). At final follow-up on March 11, 2019, 193 (15%) women had died from any cause, with no difference between the two groups (98 deaths in the ELIOT group vs 95 in the WBI group; HR 1·03, 95% CI 0·77-1·36, p=0·85). In the ELIOT group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95% CI 95·1-97·9) at 5 years, 90·7% (88·2-92·7) at 10 years, and 83·4% (79·7-86·4) at 15 years; and in the WBI group, the overall survival rate was 96·8% (95·1-97·9) at 5 years, 92·7% (90·4-94·4) at 10 years, and 82·4% (78·5-85·6) at 15 years. We did not collect long-term data on adverse events. INTERPRETATION: The long-term results of this trial confirmed the higher rate of IBTR in the ELIOT group than in the WBI group, without any differences in overall survival. ELIOT should be offered to selected patients at low-risk of IBTR. FUNDING: Italian Association for Cancer Research, Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research, Umberto Veronesi Foundation, American Italian Cancer Foundation, The Lombardy Region, and Italian Ministry of Health.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Electrons/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Breast/radiation effects , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
3.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 69(3): 240-245, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32814351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy is a challenge in lung cancer management and in achieving long-term oncological results. In November 2018, we started a prospective study on the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy. We aim to present our preliminary results. METHODS: From November 2018 to November 2019, six patients (three men and three women; median age: 61 years) were eligible for tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy for lung cancer employing the veno-venous ECMO during tracheobronchial anastomosis. RESULTS: Only in one patient, an intrapericardial pneumonectomy without ECMO support was performed, but cannulas were maintained during surgery. The median length of surgery was 201 minutes (range: 162-292 minutes), and the average duration of the apneic phase was 38 minutes (range: 31-45 minutes). No complications correlated to the positioning of the cannulas were recorded. There was only one major postoperative complication (hemothorax). At the time of follow-up, all patients were alive; one patient alive with bone metastasis was being treated with radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: ECMO-assisted oncological surgery was rarely described, and its advantages include hemodynamic stability with low bleeding complications and a clean operating field. As suggested by our preliminary data, ECMO-assisted could be a useful alternative strategy in select lung cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy , Aged , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Female , Hemothorax/etiology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 132: 161-168, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30447922

ABSTRACT

Cancer of the esophagus and of gastroesophageal junction can be cured, even if with lacking cure rate. Different approaches have been developed, mostly when carcinoma has loco-regional pattern. Multimodality therapy showed a survival rate superior than 10% if compared to a single approach. This is a systematic review, carried to assess the following matters: Which therapeutic opportunities are available? Who could benefit of them? Which adverse reactions could possibly verify? How can physicians definitely choose the proper strategy? Which is the role of surgery? We mean to give either General Practitioner or specialists clear and efficient updates about current treatment of this tumour, starting from physical examination. Four eminent guidelines were consulted for our study: Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care, NCCN, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre and Esmo.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Management , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
5.
Am Surg ; 84(9): 1509-1517, 2018 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30268186

ABSTRACT

This study determines the oncologic outcome of the combined resection and ablation strategy for colorectal liver metastases. Between January 1994 and December 2015, 373 patients underwent surgery for colorectal liver metastases. There were 284 patients who underwent hepatic resection only (Group 1) and 83 hepatic resection plus ablation (Group 2). Group 2 patients had a higher incidence of multiple metastases (100% in Group 2 vs 28.2% in Group 1; P < 0.001) and bilobar involvement (76.5% in Group 2 vs 12.9% in Group 1; P < 0.001) than Group 1 cases. Perioperative mortality was nil in either group, with a higher postoperative complication rate among Group 1 versus Group 2 cases (18 vs 0, respectively). The median follow-up was 90 months (range, 1-180), with a five-year overall survival for Group 1 and Group 2 of 51 per cent and 80 per cent, respectively (P = 0.193). Mean disease-free survival for patients with R0 resection was 55 per cent, 40 per cent, and 37 per cent at one, two, and three years, respectively, and remained steadily higher (at 50%) in those patients treated with resection combined with ablation up to five years (P = 0.069). The only intraoperative ablation failure was for a large lesion (≥5 cm). Our data support the use of intraoperative ablation when complete hepatic resection cannot be achieved.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Hepatectomy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
6.
Indian J Surg ; 80(2): 154-162, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29915482

ABSTRACT

To analyze treatment and survival in a series of resected patients with primary or recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) treated and prospectively followed at a single institution. Between July 1994 and December 2015, 89 patients (36 M, 53 F; mean age 60 years, range 25-79) were evaluated. For the purpose of analysis, complete resection was defined as removal of gross tumor with histologically confirmed clear resection margins. Eighty-three out of the 89 patients (93%), 46 of whom affected by primary RPS, and 37 by recurrent RPS, underwent surgical exploration. Sixty-two had a grossly and microscopically complete resection. Fifty-three out of 83 patients (64%) underwent removal of contiguous intra-abdominal organs. Preoperative mortality was nil and significant preoperative complications occurred in six cases only (7%). High-grade tumor pointed out to be a significant variable for a worse survival in all 83 patients amenable to undergo surgical resection (57% 5 years survival for low grade vs 14% for high grade; P = 0.0004). Among completely resected patients, only histologic grade clearly affected disease-free survival (72% 5 years survival for low grade vs 50% for high grade; P = 0.04), while the role of preoperative blood transfusions (67% 5 years survival for non-transfused patients vs 29% for transfused patients; P = 0.05) has to be evaluated in connection to patient complexity. Histological grade and recurrence are the most valuable prognostic predictors; in this clinical subset, an aggressive surgical approach in both primary and recurrent RPS is associated with a best long-term survival and disease-free survival.

7.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 102(6): 1898-1904, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27553499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is an inflammation-based score based on albuminemia and C-reactive protein concentration proved to be associated with cancer-specific survival in several neoplasms. The present study explored the immediate postoperative value of the GPS for patients undergoing pneumonectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: The value of the GPS preoperatively was studied in 250 patients undergoing pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed overall postoperative complications, pulmonary and cardiac complications, 30-day postoperative death, reoperation for early complications, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and total length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Patients with a GPS of 0 and 1 had a mean ICU length of stay of 0.8 days, whereas patients with a GPS of 2 had a mean ICU stay of 5.0 days (p = 0.004). The postoperative mortality rate in patients with a GPS of 2 was much higher than in patients with a GPS of 1 and 2, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative GPS of 2 effectively predicts a prolonged ICU stay in patients who undergo pneumonectomy for cancer. The score may be proposed as an easy-to-determine, economical, and fast preoperative tool to plan and optimize ICU admissions after elective pneumonectomy.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Pneumonectomy , Postoperative Complications/blood , Severity of Illness Index , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/blood , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Lung Neoplasms/blood , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prognosis , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Serum Albumin/analysis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiology
8.
Int J Oncol ; 48(3): 1280-9, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26782649

ABSTRACT

The present study determines the oncologic outcome of the combined resection and ablation strategy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Between January 1994 and December 2014, 360 patients underwent surgery for CRLM. There were 280 patients who underwent hepatic resection only (group 1) and 80 hepatic resection plus ablation (group 2). group 2 patients had a higher incidence of multiple metastases than group 1 cases (100% in group 2 vs. 28.2% in group 1; P<0.001) and bilobar involvement (76.5% in group 2 vs. 12.9% in group 1; P<0.001). Perioperative mortality was nil in either group with a higher postoperative complication rate amongst group 1 vs. group 2 cases (18 vs. 0, respectively). The median follow-up was 90 months (range, 1-180) with a 5-year overall survival for group 1 and group 2 of 49 and 80%, respectively (P=0.193). The median disease-free survival for patients with R0 resection was 50, 43 and 34% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively, and remained steadily higher (at 50%) in those patients treated with resection combined with ablation up to 5 years (P=0.069). The only intraoperative ablation failure was for a large lesion (≥5 cm). Our data support the use of intraoperative ablation when complete hepatic resection cannot be achieved.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheter Ablation/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Ann Surg ; 264(2): 244-51, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26764872

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We performed a prospective, randomized clinical study to assess whether prophylactic treatment with metoprolol or losartan, initiated soon after lung cancer surgery in patients with elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a well recognized complication after lung cancer surgery, with an incidence as high as 30%. Perioperative increase of NT-proBNP has been demonstrated to be a strong independent predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation in this setting. METHODS: NT-proBNP concentration was measured 24 hours before surgery and soon after surgery in 1116 patients. Three hundred twenty (29%) patients showed a high NT-proBNP value and were enrolled: 108 were assigned to the metoprolol group, 102 to the losartan group, and 110 to the control group. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was 20% (n = 64); it was significantly lower in the metoprolol and losartan groups compared with the control group [6%, 12%, and 40%, respectively; relative risk 0.19, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.09-0.37; P < 0.001 in the metoprolol group; and 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16-0.52; P < 0.001 in the losartan group). No significant difference was found when the metoprolol and losartan groups were directly compared (P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: A prophylactic treatment with metoprolol or losartan, initiated soon after lung cancer surgery in patients with high NT-proBNP levels, significantly reduced the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/prevention & control , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/blood , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Losartan/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/blood , Male , Metoprolol/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prospective Studies
10.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 98: 1-11, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26476748

ABSTRACT

No international guidelines are available for the treatment of oral tongue cancer during pregnancy. Six patients with tongue cancer during pregnancy were identified by a retrospective chart review. In three of the cases we did not follow the standard treatment, the women had disease progression, and two of them died after a short time. A multidisciplinary discussion and literature review suggest that following the standard surgical procedure could be the optimal treatment to ensure mother and baby health in tongue cancer. Nonetheless choosing between maternal advantage and potential fetal damage should not be an individual medical decision. Treatment "customization" is a possibility. Patients and their families should be provided with comprehensive information and appropriate support in order to fully participate in the decision-making process. The patient's care may be improved if carried out in a specialized maternity center where the surgical oncologic treatment is managed together with the obstetric aspects.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/surgery , Tongue Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25133397

ABSTRACT

Palliative airway treatments are essential to improve quality and length of life in lung cancer patients with central airway obstruction. Rigid bronchoscopy has proved to be an excellent tool to provide airway access and control in this cohort of patients. The main indication for rigid bronchoscopy in adult bronchology remains central airway obstruction due to neoplastic or non-neoplastic disease. We routinely use negative pressure ventilation (NPV) under general anaesthesia to prevent intraoperative apnoea and respiratory acidosis. This procedure allows opioid sparing, a shorter recovery time and avoids manually assisted ventilation, thereby reducing the amount of oxygen needed, while maintaining optimal surgical conditions. The major indication for NPV rigid bronchoscopy at our institution has been airway obstruction by neoplastic tracheobronchial tissue, mainly treated by laser-assisted mechanical dissection. When strictly necessary, we use silicone stents for neoplastic or cicatricial strictures, reserving metal stents to cover tracheo-oesophageal fistulae. NPV rigid bronchoscopy is an excellent tool for the endoscopic treatment of locally advanced tumours of the lung, especially when patients have exhausted the conventional therapeutic resources. Laser-assisted mechanical resection and stent placement are the most effective procedures for preserving quality of life in patients with advanced stage cancer.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction , Bronchoscopes/classification , Bronchoscopy , Laser Therapy/methods , Lung Neoplasms , Postoperative Complications , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Airway Obstruction/surgery , Bronchi/pathology , Bronchi/surgery , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/instrumentation , Bronchoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care/methods , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Preoperative Care/methods , Stents , Treatment Outcome
12.
Surg Technol Int ; 17: 33-8, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18802881

ABSTRACT

The principal cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality following hepatic resection is excessive intraoperative hemorrhage. This study evaluates the operative use of the LigaSure device in sealing ductal structures during major and minor hepatic resections. Patients were analyzed between June 1994 and December 2005, comparing 89 randomly selected cases undergoing hepatic resections using the clamp-crushing technique with LigaSure electrocautery and hepatic inflow occlusion where appropriate with 70 patients undergoing various hepatic resections using the clamp-crushing technique alone with hepatic inflow occlusion where appropriate. Intraoperative blood loss and perioperative blood transfusion requirements were significantly less for patients in the LigaSure group. LigaSure-assisted hepatic resection was generally performed more quickly than the conventional clamp-crushing technique. The overall maximum postoperative AST, ALT, and bilirubin serum levels were similar in the two groups, as was the incidence of major postoperative complications. The LigaSure device in this randomized study is safe and simple to use, resulting in less perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement during hepatic parenchymal transection.


Subject(s)
Electrocoagulation/instrumentation , Electrocoagulation/mortality , Hepatectomy/instrumentation , Hepatectomy/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Electrocoagulation/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Hepatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
14.
World J Surg Oncol ; 5: 73, 2007 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17610720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the surgical morbidity and long-term outcome of colorectal cancer surgery in an unselected group of patients treated over the period 1994-2003. METHODS: A consecutive series of 902 primary colorectal cancer patients (489 M, 413 F; mean age: 63 years +/- 11 years, range: 24-88 years) was evaluated and prospectively followed in a university hospital (mean follow-up 36 +/- 24 months; range: 3-108 months). Perioperative mortality, morbidity, overall survival, curative resection rates, recurrence rates were analysed. RESULTS: Of the total, 476 colorectal cancers were localized to the colon (CC, 53%), 406 to the rectum (RC, 45%), 12 (1%) were multicentric, and 8 were identified as part of HNPCC (1%). Combining all tumours, there were 186 cancers (20.6%) defined as UICC stage I, 235 (26.1%) stage II, 270 (29.9%) stage III and 187 (20.6%) stage IV cases. Twenty-four (2.7%) cases were of undetermined stage. Postoperative complications occurred in 38% of the total group (37.8% of CC cases, 37.2% of the RC group, 66.7% of the synchronous cancer patients and 50% of those with HNPCC, p = 0.19) Mortality rate was 0.8%, (1.3% for colon cancer, 0% for rectal cancer; p = 0.023). Multivisceral resection was performed in 14.3% of cases. Disease-free survival in cases resected for cure was 73% at 5-years and 72% at 8 years. The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 71% and 61% respectively (total cases). At 5-year analysis, overall survival rates are 97% for stage I disease, 87% for stage II, 73% for stage III and 22% for stage IV respectively (p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates showed a marked difference in R0, R1+R2 and non resected patients (82%, 35% and 0% respectively, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, resection for cure and stage at presentation but not tumour site (colon vs. rectum) were independent variables for overall survival (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A prospective, uniform follow-up policy used in a single institution over the last decade provides evidence of quality assurance in colorectal cancer surgery with high rates of resection for cure where only stage at presentation functions as an independent variable for cancer-related outcome.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Colectomy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Cohort Studies , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Italy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Preoperative Care/methods , Probability , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 54(74): 400-6, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17523284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study analyzed the results of treatment of rectal cancer (tumor within 12 cm of the anal verge) with different techniques. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred and sixty-four patients who had undergone elective curative surgical resection of rectal cancer within 12cm of the anal verge were evaluated. The operative data and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Comparisons were made between patients who had different surgical procedures. RESULTS: The overall peroperative mortality rate was nil, and the morbidity 39.4%. Local recurrence occurred in 21 of the patients with a median follow-up of 34 months (range: 5-105 months). The 3-year actuarial local recurrence rates for double-stapled anastomosis, low straight anastomosis and APR were 25%, 6%, and 5%, respectively. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher for double-stapled low anterior resection than for the other types of operation (p = 0.013). On multivariate analysis reconstruction with Knight-Griffen anastomosis (p = 0.013) and tumor distance from the anal verge <6 cm (p = 0.001), were associated with local recurrence but only stage was a significant prognosticator of overall survival (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Following total mesorectal excision, the local recurrence rate was higher in patients treated with double-stapled low anterior resection than in those with termino-terminal low anterior resection or APR; survival rates were similar in these groups.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Rectum/surgery , Surgical Staplers , Survival Rate
17.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 54(80): 2353-7, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18265663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The major complication for liver resection is hemorrhage. Energy sources other than electrosurgery have become popular with the promise of quick and effective vascular control. This study evaluates alternative energy sources in sealing ductal structures for use in liver resection with minimal blood loss. METHODOLOGY: Between June 1994 and December 2003, a consecutive 116 patients (59 male; 57 female; mean age: 60 +/- 11 years; range: 27-79 years) underwent surgery for primary (n = 30), metastatic liver cancer (n = 79), or benign lesions (n = 7). The extent of hepatic parenchymal division is marked on the surface with a diathermy-scored line. The arteries, veins, and bile ducts crossing the line of division are grasped, singly or in groups, by the Ligasure (Autosuture, United States Surgical Corp., Norwalk, CT) electrocautery device. RESULTS: Fifty-eight formal hepatic resections, and 58 non-anatomical wedge resection were performed. The blood loss ranged from 100 mL to 3000 mL (median: 430 mL). Only 32 patients received preoperative blood transfusions. Perioperative mortality was nil (within 30 days following surgery), and postoperative major complications were seen in 14 patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: The Ligasure device uses bipolar electrothermal energy to coagulate the opposing walls of the target vessels. A feedback-control mechanism ensures that tissues are not charred by overcoagulation. This results in a high-burst strength vessel seal. Sealing is effective in vessels up to 7mm in diameter. Larger vessels require formal suture or stapling. This described technique is simple, rapid, safe for parenchymal division during hepatectomy, resulting in minimal blood loss.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Electrocoagulation/instrumentation , Hepatectomy/instrumentation , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects
19.
Arch Surg ; 140(10): 936-9, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16230541

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Although postoperative fractionated radiotherapy (PFR) remains the standard method for conservative treatment of breast carcinomas, widespread experience in the use of full-dose intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) merits its application in novel clinical situations, although long-term results of ongoing clinical trials have not been fully reported. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Division of breast surgery in a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: From June 1999 to September 2003 ELIOT was used as the sole radiotherapy in 355 patients with unifocal invasive carcinoma who were candidates for breast-conserving surgery and most of whom were participating in an ongoing institutional trial. In a group of patients in whom PFR was not considered safe or feasible (because of previous mantle field irradiation for Hodgkin disease, cosmetic breast augmentation, severe cardiopathy, large hypertrophic scarring from skin burns, vitiligo, and geographic or social obstacles), ELIOT was performed outside of the ongoing trial. RESULTS: No particular adverse effects, unusual acute reactions, late sequelae, and local or systemic events were noted in these patients after a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriated selected patients, when it is critical to perform PFR after breast-conserving therapy, a single dose of ELIOT may be considered to avoid mastectomy, reduce potential treatment toxicity, improve quality of life, and resolve logistic problems. The long-term results of ongoing clinical trials will further delineate patients in whom ELIOT may replace PFR.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL