Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 23(2): 330-335, 2017 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27793960

ABSTRACT

On April 25, 2016, the FDA approved cabozantinib (Cabometyx; Exelixis, Inc.) for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients who have received prior antiangiogenic therapy. The approval was based on data from one randomized, open-label, multicenter study in which patients with RCC who had received prior antiangiogenic therapy were treated with either cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily (n = 330) or everolimus 10 mg orally once daily (n = 328). The major efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by a blinded independent radiology review committee in the first 375 randomized patients. A statistically significant improvement in PFS was seen, with a median PFS of 7.4 and 3.8 months in the cabozantinib and everolimus arms, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.74; P < 0.0001]. At a second interim analysis, a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population was also demonstrated, with a median OS of 21.4 and 16.5 months in the cabozantinib and everolimus arms, respectively (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.83; P = 0.0003). The most common (greater than or equal to 25%) adverse reactions included diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, hypertension, vomiting, weight loss, and constipation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 330-5. ©2016 AACR.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Anilides/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Anilides/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Approval , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyridines/adverse effects , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 21(19): 4257-61, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26187614

ABSTRACT

On December 19, 2014, the FDA approved olaparib capsules (Lynparza; AstraZeneca) for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer who have been treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. The BRACAnalysis CDx (Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.) was approved concurrently. An international multicenter, single-arm trial enrolled 137 patients with measurable gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancer treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Patients received olaparib at a dose of 400 mg by mouth twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The objective response rate (ORR) was 34% with median response duration of 7.9 months in this cohort. The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with olaparib were anemia, nausea, fatigue (including asthenia), vomiting, diarrhea, dysgeusia, dyspepsia, headache, decreased appetite, nasopharyngitis/pharyngitis/upper respiratory infection, cough, arthralgia/musculoskeletal pain, myalgia, back pain, dermatitis/rash, and abdominal pain/discomfort. Myelodysplatic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 2% of the patients enrolled on this trial.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Approval , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Germ-Line Mutation , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Phthalazines/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Phthalazines/pharmacology , Piperazines/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , United States
3.
J Food Prot ; 59(8): 876-880, 1996 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31159114

ABSTRACT

Recalls of foods and cosmetics from the marketplace are an expeditious and effective method of removing violative products, particularly those that present a danger to health. Recalls are undertaken through a cooperative effort by industry and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Foods and cosmetics recalled from the period 1 October 1991 through 30 September 1992 were reviewed to determine the kinds of products recalled and the reasons for recall. A total of 230 recalls, involving 569 foods and cosmetics, occurred during the study period. Twenty-eight percent of the recalls were designated class I, defined as a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences. The problems for which foods or cosmetics were most often recalled were misbranding and microbial contamination (37% and 25% of recalls, respectively). A recognized illness or injury was reported to have occurred in association with 32 food products and one cosmetic. This study indicates that recalls of foods and cosmetics are common and that various groups, including industry, consumers, state regulatory agencies, and the FDA, recognize problems leading to recall.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...