ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Delphi survey. OBJECTIVES: To obtain an expert consensus on various dilemmas in the surgical treatment of adult spinal tuberculosis (TB) patients. METHODS: Stage I included a literature review, stage II the identification of 40 Key Opinion leaders (KOLs) and a set of 46 questions, stage III included analysis of 3 rounds of the Delphi survey, and stage IV had final analysis and recommendations. For each question, the level of agreement needed to reach a consensus was set at greater than or equal to 70.0%. RESULTS: The first and second Delphi survey rounds received 62 and 58 responses, respectively, with 16 questions having more than 70% and two questions having 100% agreement in the first stage. The second stage saw a 70% agreement on six questions. Thus, a consensus was obtained on 22 questions. The recommendations that emerged were as follows: neurodeficit with corresponding radiology and neurological deficit appearing/deteriorating while on anti-tubercular chemotherapy(ATT) are absolute indications for surgery, duration of ATT before neurological deterioration need not be considered, epidural abscess does not need decompression unless concordant clinical neurological findings are present, pain not responding to medical management is not a surgical indication, active pulmonary TB, drug-resistant TB, and tubercular sacroiliitis are not considered as surgical indications, and hemoglobin and other health markers have little contribution to surgical indications. CONCLUSION: In order to resolve several conundrums in the surgical treatment of adult spinal TB, this Delphi survey is the first to achieve a national consensus from spine experts. The final recommendations cover the serological, radiographic, and clinical aspects of spinal TB.
ABSTRACT
Fragility hip fractures treated in a center in the Middle East were retrospectively studied for adequacy of osteoporosis management. Of the 318 patients treated, over 70% did not have a structured investigation and about 30% did not receive any therapeutic supplements. Our series showed a preventable 8.8% secondary fracture rate. PURPOSE: To study the adequacy of evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis after fragility fractures of the hip. The study also attempts to estimate the prevalence of secondary fractures after the original injury. METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of the electronic database to search all the admissions for fractures of the hip in patients over 50 years at a tertiary care Trauma and Orthopaedic center in the Sultanate of Oman. The study period was defined as October 2010 to December 2015. Their case records, BMD reports, and laboratory data were analyzed. Pharmacological interventions and the documented compliance with such therapy were also recorded. RESULTS: Over the study period, 318 fragility fractures of the hip were treated. Of these, 233 (73.3%) did not receive a DEXA scan and 94% did not have their vitamin D3 (vit D) tested. About 29.9% percent cases did not receive any nutritional supplement or therapeutic intervention though diagnosed as fragility fracture. Twenty-eight patients (8.8%) reported for secondary fractures of the hip. Of these, 86% was initiated on supplement after their index fracture though 78.6% had not had a BMD study. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 27% patients receive BMD test following fragility fracture of the hip and only 6% a vit D3 assay. Secondary fractures of the hip tend to occur in approximately 9% of the cases in Oman; this seems to occur equally in patients who have had as well as not had any calcium and vit D supplements after the index injury.
