Predicting the need for abdominal hemorrhage control in major pelvic fracture patients: the importance of quantifying the amount of free fluid.

BACKGROUND: In our institution, the computed tomographic (CT) scan has largely replaced the ultrasound for the rapid detection of intraperitoneal free fluid (FF) and abdominal injuries in severely injured patients.We hypothesized that in major pelvic fracture patients, quantifying the size of FF on CT improves the predictive value for the need for abdominal hemorrhage control (AHC). METHODS: The CT scans of major pelvic fracture (pelvic ring disruption) patients (January 1, 2004, to June 31, 2012) were reviewed for the presence of FF (small, moderate, or large amount) and abdominal injuries. AHC was defined as requiring a surgical intervention for active abdominal bleeding or angiographic embolization for an abdominal arterial injury.Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for all patients and in a subgroup of patients with a high risk for significant hemorrhage (base deficit ≥ 6 mEq/L). RESULTS: Overall, 160 patients were included in the study. Of the 62 FF patients, 26 required AHC (PPV, 42%, 95% CI, 30-55%). Of the 98 patients without FF, none required AHC (NPV, 100%; 95% CI, 95-100%). For a moderate-to-large amount of FF, the PPV and NPV in all patients were 81% (95% CI, 60-93%) and 96% (95% CI, 91-99%), respectively.In the subgroup of 49 high-risk patients (31%), 17 of 26 FF patients required AHC (PPV, 65%; 95% CI, 44-82%), and none of the 23 patients without FF required AHC (NPV, 100%; 95% CI, 82-100%). For a moderate-to-large amount, the PPV and NPV in high-risk patients were 93% (95% CI, 64-100%) and 89% (95% CI, 72-96%), respectively. CONCLUSION: In major pelvic fracture patients, the predictive value of FF on CT for the need for AHC is closely related to the amount present. A moderate-to-large amount of FF is highly predictive for the presence of abdominal bleeding that requires hemorrhage control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV; prognostic study, level III.

Management of pelvic ring fracture patients with a pelvic "blush" on early computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: The sliding computed tomographic (CT) scanner in our trauma resuscitation room can be used early in the assessment of pelvic ring fracture patients. We determined the association between the presence of a pelvic blush on CT scan and the need for pelvic hemorrhage control (PHC). We hypothesized that many pelvic blushes found early in the resuscitation phase can be safely managed without intervention. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced CT scans of pelvic ring fracture (pelvic ring disruption) patients admitted from January 1, 2004, to June 31, 2012, were reviewed for the presence of a pelvic blush. PHC was defined as requiring a surgical or radiologic intervention for pelvic bleeding. A subanalysis was performed in "isolated" pelvic fracture/ blush patients (absence of a major nonpelvic bleeding source). RESULTS: Overall, 68 (42%) of 162 pelvic ring fracture patients and 53 (40%) of 134 isolated pelvic fracture patients had a pelvic blush. Of those 32 (47%) and 27 (51%) patients, respectively, required PHC. In the absence of a pelvic blush, 87 (93%) of 94 of all and 77 (95%) of 81 of isolated pelvic fracture patients did not require PHC. Of all patients with a pelvic blush and of isolated pelvic blush, those with PHC had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.05), base deficit (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01), as well as 24-hour and any packed red blood cells requirement (p <0.001 and p = 0.05; p <0.001 and p = 0.02). In isolated pelvic blush patients, there was a trend toward a higher hospital and hemorrhage-related mortality in patients with PHC (p = 0.06 and p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: In pelvic ring fracture patients, a pelvic blush on early contrast-enhanced CT is a frequent finding. Many patients with (particularly isolated) pelvic blushes have stable vital signs and can be managed without surgical or radiologic PHC. The need for an intervention for a pelvic blush seems to be determined by the presence of clinical signs of ongoing bleeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV. Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

The utility of FAST for initial abdominal screening of major pelvic fracture patients.

BACKGROUND: Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is widely used in pelvic fracture patients. We examined the performance of FAST for detecting hemoperitoneum and predicting the need for intra-abdominal hemorrhage control in major pelvic fracture patients. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study of major pelvic fracture patients was performed. The presence of hemoperitoneum was confirmed on CT or at laparotomy. The need for hemorrhage control was defined as requiring a surgical or radiological intervention for intra-abdominal bleeding. Hemorrhagic shock (HS) patients had a systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg or base deficit of ≥ 6 mEq/L on admission. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included, 42 (35 %) of which had any hemoperitoneum and 21 (18 %) had a moderate-large amount. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FAST for any hemoperitoneum were 64, 94, 84, and 83 % and for a moderate-large amount they were 86, 86, 56, and 97 %. In HS patients the indices were 68, 93, 88, and 78 % for any hemoperitoneum and 79, 83, 65, and 91 % for a moderate-large amount. For the need for hemorrhage control, FAST had a positive predictive value of 50 % (16/32) in all and 71 % (12/17) in HS patients. The negative predictive value was 99 % (87/88) in all and 97 % (31/32) in HS patients. CONCLUSION: FAST had a good to excellent diagnostic accuracy, depending on the size of hemoperitoneum. A positive FAST result (even in HS patients) does not reliably predict the need for immediate intra-abdominal hemorrhage control but a negative FAST result renders the need for an intervention highly unlikely.