ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The current study was undertaken to determine the midterm and long-term radiological outcomes, complications and functional status of patients who underwent a single-level anterior interbody lumbar fusion (ALIF) procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain affects 70%-90% of the general population at some point in their life, and in general, the majority are best treated by nonsurgical therapy. However, a lumbar fusion can be considered in selected cases. In previous decades, lumbar interbody fusion procedures have gained popularity. Despite the approach used, stand-alone interbody fusion is becoming less popular due to poor fusion rates. When studying ALIF procedures, the addition of instrumentation results in higher fusion rates. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up can give either unexpected or similar insights into certain procedures that should be available in the current literature. Therefore, the current study was undertaken to determine the midterm and long-term radiological outcomes, complications, and functional status of patients who underwent a single-level ALIF procedure. METHODS: A cohort of 50 patients was studied following stand-alone ALIF for midterm and long-term follow-up of 6.6 years and 19.7 years, respectively. Primary outcome measurements were disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and pain scores using the visual analog scale, and the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to evaluate the quality of life. In addition, radiographic assessment was performed to indicate the number of solid fusions. RESULTS: After a mean of 19.7 years, we had a loss to follow-up of 34%. Functional measurements revealed an ODI of 41 for both time points and an SF-36 physical component score around 41.4 and 40.8 for the midterm and long-term follow-up, respectively. The mental component of the SF-36 was 48.7 and 49.9, respectively. The assessment of interbody fusion revealed only 66% and 70% solid fusion after 6.6 years and 19.7 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In concordance with previous studies, the outcome of midterm and long-term results in this study showed that the I/F cage in ALIF procedures is a safe treatment option for single-level interbody fusion. The radiological results corroborate literature regarding stand-alone interbody fusion, and additional instrumentation is likely to increase fusion rates. However, functional measurements reveal that the postsurgical situation remains likely worse than patients in a healthy Dutch population but possibly better that in a back pain population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Various imaging techniques are used for excluding or confirming periprosthetic hip infection, but there is no consensus regarding the most accurate technique. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of current imaging modalities in diagnosing periprosthetic hip infection. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted with a comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase to identify clinical studies in which periprosthetic hip infection was investigated with different imaging modalities. The sensitivity and specificity of each imaging technique were determined and compared with the results of microbiological and histological analysis, intraoperative findings, and clinical follow-up of >6 months. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies, published between 1988 and 2014, were included for meta-analysis, representing 1,753 hip prostheses. Quality assessment of the included studies identified low concerns with regard to external validity but more concerns with regard to internal validity including risk of bias (>50% of studies had insufficient information). No meta-analysis was performed for radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging because of insufficient available clinical data. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81% to 94%) and 92% (95% CI, 88% to 96%), respectively, for leukocyte scintigraphy; 86% (95% CI, 80% to 90%) and 93% (95% CI, 90% to 95%) for fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET); 69% (95% CI, 58% to 79%) and 96% (95% CI, 93% to 98%) for combined leukocyte and bone marrow scintigraphy; 84% (95% CI, 70% to 93%) and 75% (95% CI, 66% to 82%) for antigranulocyte scintigraphy; and 80% (95% CI, 72% to 86%) and 69% (95% CI, 64% to 73%) for bone scintigraphy. CONCLUSIONS: Of the currently used imaging techniques, leukocyte scintigraphy has satisfactory accuracy in confirming or excluding periprosthetic hip infection. Although not significantly different, combined leukocyte and bone marrow scintigraphy was the most specific imaging technique. FDG PET has an appropriate accuracy in confirming or excluding periprosthetic hip infection, but may not yet be the preferred imaging modality because of limited availability and relatively higher cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
