From intention to action: Assessing need and creating a JEDI toolkit for individuals teaching cancer genetics curriculum.

The effects of systemic racism persist in cancer care and contribute to disparities. Recent publications have shown that injustices and biases continue to affect the field of genetic counseling in the form of microaggressions, barriers to entry, and disparate patient care. Toolkits are one method that can be used to incorporate anti-racist practices to address this need. We sought to identify the current state of coverage of Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) topics during cancer genetics training across genetic counseling training programs (GCTPs) and utilize this information to create a novel toolkit that would support integration of anti-racist pedagogy into formal genetic counseling curricula. To accomplish this aim, recent learners and program directors/cancer course instructors were surveyed using two novel surveys. The survey responses, which helped to identify the frequency and manner of incorporation of JEDI topics into cancer curricula in GCTPs, led to the development of an educational toolkit. Recent learners and instructors/program directors identified multiple content areas within cancer genetic training in which they felt incorporating JEDI topics would be desired. A toolkit to support the incorporation of anti-racist teaching and practices into cancer genetics training in GCTPs was created. This toolkit can be adapted to focus on topics relevant to the care of other marginalized identities and to support the learning of other healthcare providers receiving cancer genetics education.

Outcomes of the "BRCA Quality Improvement Dissemination Program": An initiative to improve patient receipt of cancer genetics services at five health systems.

OBJECTIVE: A quality improvement initiative (QII) was conducted with five community-based health systems' oncology care centers (sites A-E). The QII aimed to increase referrals, genetic counseling (GC), and germline genetic testing (GT) for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: QII activities occurred at sites over several years, all concluding by December 2020. Medical records of patients with OC and TNBC were reviewed, and rates of referral, GC, and GT of patients diagnosed during the 2 years before the QII were compared to those diagnosed during the QII. Outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, two-sample t-test, chi-squared/Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: For patients with OC, improvement was observed in the rate of referral (from 70% to 79%), GC (from 44% to 61%), GT (from 54% to 62%) and decreased time from diagnosis to GC and GT. For patients with TNBC, increased rates of referral (from 90% to 92%), GC (from 68% to 72%) and GT (81% to 86%) were observed. Effective interventions streamlined GC scheduling and standardized referral processes. CONCLUSION: A multi-year QII increased patient referral and uptake of recommended genetics services across five unique community-based oncology care settings.