ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine graduate students' non-medical use of prescription stimulant medication, and the relationship between non-medical use of prescription stimulants with academic self-efficacy, psychological factors (i.e., anxiety, depression, and stress), and internal restlessness. METHOD: The sample consisted of 807 graduate students from universities located in five geographic regions of the United States. RESULTS: Past-year rates of self-reported non-medical use were determined to be 5.9%, with overall lifetime prevalence of 17.5%. Observed self-reported non-medical use of prescription stimulant medications was significantly correlated with self-reported levels of anxiety and stress, various aspects of internal restlessness, and perceived safety of the medications. CONCLUSION: Findings support graduate students' motivations of non-medical prescription stimulant use to be both academic and social in nature. Effective prevention and education efforts are needed to help address the non-medical use of prescription stimulants by graduate students on university campuses.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Motivation , Prescription Drugs/administration & dosage , Self Medication/psychology , Students/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Drug Prescriptions , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Self Efficacy , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States , UniversitiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stimulant medication on symptoms and functioning for college students with ADHD using double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. METHOD: Participants included 24 college students with ADHD and 26 college students without psychopathology. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) was examined for ADHD participants over five weekly phases (no-drug baseline, placebo, 30-, 50-, and 70-mg LDX per day). Self-report rating scales of functioning and direct assessment of ADHD symptoms, verbal learning/memory, and adverse side effects were collected (baseline only for control students). RESULTS: LDX was associated with large reductions in ADHD symptoms and improvement in executive functioning along with smaller effects for psychosocial functioning. Reduction in ADHD symptoms was found for 86.4% of participants; however, large differences in symptoms and executive functioning remained relative to controls. CONCLUSION: LDX is a safe, efficacious treatment for symptom relief in college students with ADHD. Research documenting medication effects on academic functioning and evaluating psychosocial/educational interventions is needed.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Dextroamphetamine/therapeutic use , Students/psychology , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Cross-Over Studies , Dextroamphetamine/adverse effects , Dextroamphetamine/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Executive Function/drug effects , Female , Humans , Learning/drug effects , Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Treatment Outcome , Universities , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To further investigate use and potential misuse of prescription stimulants (e.g., Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta) among a sample of college students and to explore the relationship between psychological variables and nonmedical stimulant use. METHOD: The sample consisted of 390 college students (71.6% female, 28.4% male). Participants were asked to complete five questionnaires concerning demographic information, prescription stimulant use, internal restlessness, sensation seeking, and psychological distress. RESULTS: The study findings revealed that, regarding nonprescribed stimulants, 7.5% reported use within the past 30 days; 60% reported knowing students who misused stimulants; and 50% agreed or strongly agreed that prescription stimulants were "easy to get on this campus." Findings further revealed a relationship between stimulant use and degree of psychological distress and internal restlessness. CONCLUSIONS: Continued research regarding psychological variables, specific group membership (e.g., fraternity, sorority, athletics), and stimulant acquisition is suggested. Effective prevention and education efforts are needed to help address the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants on college campuses.
