Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 141(3): 747-750, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29481405

ABSTRACT

Apert syndrome is characterized by hypertelorism, a negative canthal axis, and central midfacial hypoplasia, resulting in a biconcave face. Bipartition distraction partially corrects these facial anomalies. This study investigates limitations of bipartition distraction using linear, angular, and geometric morphometric analysis. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional computed tomographic craniofacial constructs of 10 patients with Apert syndrome (aged 12 to 21 years) were annotated with 98 landmarks. Twelve age-, sex, and ethnicity-matched normal skulls provided control data. Principal component analysis was used to analyze shape characteristics within and between the groups and describe the changes occurring with surgery. Results were displayed graphically using difference color maps. Conventional point-based measurements documented midfacial width, height, and asymmetry. Apert three-dimensional constructs exhibited reduced upper midfacial height and greater extrinsic symmetric variation relative to controls. Facial bipartition partially corrected excessive midfacial width and interorbital distance but did not adequately correct deficient upper midfacial height. Excessive orbital diameter was unaltered by surgery. There was no demonstrable effect on intrinsic or extrinsic midfacial asymmetry. Principal component analysis demonstrated improved midfacial projection and correction of central biconcavity. Bipartition distraction corrects midfacial retrusion, exorbitism, and hypertelorism. It does not treat midfacial height disproportion or correct orbital shape. It leaves the face too wide at the zygomatic level and does not correct facial asymmetry. Although bipartition distraction is an improvement on the unmodified monobloc advancement, further refinements are needed to fully correct Apert dysmorphology.


Subject(s)
Acrocephalosyndactylia/surgery , Craniofacial Dysostosis/surgery , Facial Bones/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Craniofacial Dysostosis/diagnostic imaging , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 67(6): e151-61, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24709088

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Apert syndrome is a congenital disorder characterized by craniosynostosis and midface hypoplasia. This study looks to identify to what extent bipartition distraction corrects the morphological abnormalities of this condition. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) scans of 10 patients with Apert syndrome (12-21 years) were identified from the Great Ormond Street Hospital database. To analyse preoperative and postoperative scans, 98 landmarks and 13 normal skulls were used. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to analyse patterns in the datasets. Within each group, eigenvectors were identified that demonstrated the aspects of the skull where most variations were found. The analysis allowed both global shape measurement and local proportions. Postoperative and normal scans both showed the same first three principal components. Warping from preoperative to postoperative illustrates midface advancement and inward rotation of the orbits. Postoperative to normal warps demonstrate some remaining differences. The reliability of the used land marks varied between 77% and 95% for the highly reproducible landmarks between the two observers. 95% versus 100% were at least acceptable reproducible landmarks. This study allows us to understand the way bipartition distraction corrects the abnormalities of the Apert skull. Analysing the surgical outcome of facial bipartition with geometric morphometrics shows that some major Apert characteristics are corrected. Using the data and the output of further studies, surgical procedures can be adapted in order to achieve a postoperative result closer to the normal population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic clinical question Level IV.


Subject(s)
Acrocephalosyndactylia/diagnostic imaging , Acrocephalosyndactylia/surgery , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Acrocephalosyndactylia/diagnosis , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks , Case-Control Studies , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Facial Bones/abnormalities , Facial Bones/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...