Access to expensive cancer drugs in Dutch daily practice: should we be concerned?

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether equal access to bortezomib has been achieved under the Dutch policy regulations that guarantee equal access to expensive inpatient drugs. METHODS: We investigated accessibility to bortezomib treatment at national and regional levels by (i) conducting interviews with stakeholders in the Dutch healthcare system to explore prescription barriers and (ii) tabulating sales data from 2004-2009 and trial participation rates. RESULTS: Interviews revealed awareness of the high treatment costs, although prescription barriers were not encountered. National use of bortezomib increased slowly (treating 2% of patients in 2004 to 17% in 2009), indicating a long adjustment period. Furthermore, use remains below the rate estimated by the professional association of haematologists (27%). Regional differences were found for both daily practice use (e.g. ranging from 13-27% in 2009) and clinical trial participation (e.g. ranging from 1-12% in 2006). CONCLUSION: Our results were somewhat conflicting: interviews did not reveal any prescription barriers, but quantitative methods showed regional differences, signs of underutilisation, and access inequality. Investigating use and accessibility, based on data triangulation, provides valuable feedback which can enhance evidence-based decision making for both physicians and policymakers. This could improve appropriate and efficient use and ensure equal access to expensive drugs.

Real-world costs of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantations for haematological diseases: a multicentre study.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an expensive lifesaving procedure, which is increasingly performed in patients with haematological diseases. Developments in the protocol for SCT have resulted in cost estimates that require updating. We aimed to calculate actual costs for SCT and to identify major cost drivers by means of a daily practice cost study. We randomly selected 191 patients, treated at three university hospitals, who underwent an autologous (auto) SCT or allogeneic (allo) SCT in 2007, 2008 or 2009. Allo-SCT included sibling donors, matched unrelated donors (MUD) and umbilical cord blood (UCB). Resource use was collected from the hospital registration systems and medical files. The total costs included selection and harvesting of stem cells, transplantation and 1-year follow-up. The average costs per patient were 45,670 € for auto-SCT and 101,919 € for sibling allo-SCT. The costs of transplantations from unrelated donors were much higher: 171,478 € for allo-SCT-MUD and 254,689 € for allo-SCT-UCB. Hospital inpatient days together with laboratory and other activities were the main cost drivers across all types of SCT. Besides, donor search costs were a large cost component in allo-SCT-sib (18 %) and allo-SCT-MUD (12 %). Real-world costs were above routine reimbursement and appropriate financing is necessary to guarantee the continuation of SCT. The costs calculated in this study provide reliable up-to-date input for cost-effectiveness studies and budget revision.

[Experience of family members with the decision concerning artificial nutrition and hydration in people with dementia in nursing homes]. / Ervaringen van familie met de besluitvorming rond kunstmatige toediening van vocht en voedsel (ktvv) bij mensen met dementie in het verpleeghuis.

The purpose of this study is to investigate how relatives of nursing home patients with dementia, for whom the decision whether to start or forgo artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) was made, assess the decision-making process. Furthermore we evaluated the information given by the nursing home staff to the relatives and the care provided by them to the patient. The study was an observational study based on written questionnaires. Relatives of 99 nursing home patients with dementia filled in a questionnaire at the time of the decision-making and 6 weeks after the decision was made or 6 weeks after the patient had died. Almost all relatives assessed the 4 aspects of the decision-making process (number of consults, content of the consults, carefulness of the decision-making and there own part in the decision-making process) at both times as 'good' or 'satisfactory'. Furthermore it appeared that they judged the carefulness of the decision-making process significantly more often as 'good' when they also assessed the other three aspects as 'good'. Especially their own influence on the decision-making process appeared to play a part in this matter. Information about the possible consequences of starting ANH as well as about the condition of the patient were experienced sufficient by almost all relatives. This was also the case for the care offered to the patient. In general almost all relatives reported satisfaction with the decision and with the carefulness of the decision-making process. This satisfaction did not differ between the moment of the decision and afterwards. For this it did not make any difference whether the patient had or had not died.