Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 34(11): 1780-1785, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31370701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postnatal growth restriction remains one of the most common problems of very preterm infants (VPI). Chorioamnionitis is a frequent cause of prematurity. Both have been related to worse postnatal outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of histological chorioamnionitis (CA) on postnatal growth in very premature infants. METHODS: Retrospective one-to-one matched cohort study assessing growth in infants born at or below 32.0 weeks gestation from mothers for whom histological examination of the placenta was available. Newborns with histological CA were matched and compared with those without it. Postnatal growth was recorded at admission, 14 days of life, 28 days of life and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). Nutritional support and clinical outcomes were used as covariables. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included: 44 with fetal or/and maternal placental inflammation, and 44 without histological CA (41% with vasculopathy findings and 59% without). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Change in weight z-scores at 14 days of life, 28 days of life, 36 weeks PMA or at discharge were similar in both groups, with a steady fall and no signs of catch-up. No differences were found in enteral and parenteral nutritional intakes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Histological CA did not affect postnatal growth of very preterm infants after matching for birth weight z-scores with non-CA newborns.


Subject(s)
Chorioamnionitis , Birth Weight , Chorioamnionitis/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Placenta , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
3.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 86(2): 61-66, feb. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-159742

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Mejorar la experiencia del paciente debe convertirse en una prioridad en los Servicios de Urgencias. En Pediatría, a menudo, se estudia la opinión de padres/cuidadores y no la de los niños directamente. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer la experiencia como paciente del paciente pediátrico ingresado desde el Servicio de Urgencias pediátricas. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo prospectivo. Se diseña una encuesta basada en el cuestionario Picker sobre la experiencia del paciente que estudia la proporción de insatisfacción. Las encuestas son contestadas directamente por niños de 8-17 años que son visitados e ingresados desde Urgencias de un hospital terciario pediátrico. Se entregan las encuestas durante las primeras 24 h de ingreso de enero a mayo del 2014. RESULTADOS: Se obtienen 217 encuestas. La mediana de edad es de 12 años. Los niños piensan que la espera fue más larga de lo esperado (19,4%) y que las actividades de entretenimiento fueron inadecuadas (46,2%). Sobre la visita médica, el 4,6% piensa que el personal no explicó correctamente los procedimientos y para el 23% no tuvieron la suficiente privacidad. Sobre el conjunto de la visita, el 99,1% de los pacientes se sintió bastante o muy bien tratado. No se han encontrado diferencias en el grado de satisfacción en función del sexo, la edad o el tiempo de espera. CONCLUSIONES: Globalmente, la experiencia del paciente pediátrico en nuestro Servicio de Urgencias fue positiva. Algunos aspectos son susceptibles de mejora, como las actividades durante la espera y la privacidad durante la visita


INTRODUCTION: Improving patient experience must become a priority in paediatric emergency departments. This experience is often studied by surveying parents, and not children directly. The aim of this study was to assess the patient experience of children attended in a Paediatric Emergency Department (PED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was conducted using a survey based on the Picker questionnaire on the patient experience. From January to May 2014, children 8-17 years seen in the Paediatric Emergency Department and admitted to the hospital were asked to complete the questionnaires anonymously, within 24hours of admission. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients completed the survey. The responses showed the 19.4% had to wait longer than expected, with 46.2% saying that there was not enough for children of their age group to do while waiting to be seen. As regards care and treatment, 4.6% of participants said staff did not fully explain what they were doing, and 23% said that they were not given enough privacy when being examined. Overall, 99.1% of patients said that they were well treated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall patient experience in the PED was positive. Some aspects have to be improved (activities in the waiting room, and privacy during the examination)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Emergency Medical Services/trends , Patient Satisfaction , Life Change Events , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Hospitalization/trends
4.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 86(2): 61-66, 2017 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27255352

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Improving patient experience must become a priority in paediatric emergency departments. This experience is often studied by surveying parents, and not children directly. The aim of this study was to assess the patient experience of children attended in a Paediatric Emergency Department (PED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was conducted using a survey based on the Picker questionnaire on the patient experience. From January to May 2014, children 8-17 years seen in the Paediatric Emergency Department and admitted to the hospital were asked to complete the questionnaires anonymously, within 24hours of admission. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients completed the survey. The responses showed the 19.4% had to wait longer than expected, with 46.2% saying that there was not enough for children of their age group to do while waiting to be seen. As regards care and treatment, 4.6% of participants said staff did not fully explain what they were doing, and 23% said that they were not given enough privacy when being examined. Overall, 99.1% of patients said that they were well treated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall patient experience in the PED was positive. Some aspects have to be improved (activities in the waiting room, and privacy during the examination).


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Service, Hospital , Patient Satisfaction , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Self Report
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...