Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 58(4): 208-213, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32053103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To help identify adverse events (AEs) in new biologic therapies and to spread the culture of pharmaceutical surveillance among patients affected by psoriasis or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This active pharmacovigilance program provided all patients with telephone follow-ups (FU), carried out by a clinical pharmacologist for a total duration of 1 year. Collected AEs were classified according to the MedDRA dictionary. RESULTS: 21 patients with psoriasis and 10 patients with IBD were enrolled. In our sample, the AEs reported were frequent but mild, underlining the crucial role of active pharmacovigilance in detecting minor AEs rarely spontaneously reported by the patients. CONCLUSION: According to our experience, a multidisciplinary team is recommended to manage complex therapies improving AE reporting and promoting greater therapeutic adherence.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Pharmacovigilance , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Humans
2.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 15: 3453-3459, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31908460

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Dual diagnosis (DD) is the co-occurrence of both a mental illness and a substance use disorder (SUD). Lots of studies have analysed the integrated clinical approach, which involves both psychiatry and toxicology medical experts. The purpose of this study is to analyse the socio-demographic characteristics and treatment strategies of patients with DD in a rural area of Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 750 patients were collected in 2016 through the analysis of health plan records. RESULTS: The rate of co-occurring disorders is highly variable among people with SUD. In the considered area, patients with DD are 24%, of these only 46.1% have been treated with an integrated clinical program. Moreover, this percentage is further reduced (35.8%) if only patients with heroin use disorder are considered. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive revision of DD treatment is needed, especially for people suffering from heroin use disorder and living in remote areas. Meticulous data analysis from other addiction health services of rural areas could be necessary to identify a science-based clinical intervention.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...