Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 99(6): 1460-9, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24695893

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies on theoretical diets are not sufficient to implement sustainable diets in practice because of unknown cultural acceptability. In contrast, self-selected diets can be considered culturally acceptable. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify the most sustainable diets consumed by people in everyday life. DESIGN: The diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) for self-selected diets of 1918 adults participating in the cross-sectional French national dietary survey Individual and National Survey on Food Consumption (INCA2) were estimated. "Lower-Carbon," "Higher-Quality," and "More Sustainable" diets were defined as having GHGE lower than the overall median value, a probability of adequate nutrition intake (PANDiet) score (a measure of the overall nutritional adequacy of a diet) higher than the overall median value, and a combination of both criteria, respectively. Diet cost, as a proxy for affordability, and energy density were also assessed. RESULTS: More Sustainable diets were consumed by 23% of men and 20% of women, and their GHGE values were 19% and 17% lower than the population average (mean) value, respectively. In comparison with the average value, Lower-Carbon diets achieved a 20% GHGE reduction and lower cost, but they were not sustainable because they had a lower PANDiet score. Higher-Quality diets were not sustainable because of their above-average GHGE and cost. More Sustainable diets had an above-average PANDiet score and a below-average energy density, cost, GHGE, and energy content; the energy share of plant-based products was increased by 20% and 15% compared with the average for men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A strength of this study was that most of the dimensions for "sustainable diets" were considered, ie, not only nutritional quality and GHGE but also affordability and cultural acceptability. A reduction in diet-related GHGE by 20% while maintaining high nutritional quality seems realistic. This goal could be achieved at no extra cost by reducing energy intake and energy density and increasing the share of plant-based products.


Subject(s)
Caloric Restriction , Conservation of Natural Resources , Energy Intake , Models, Biological , Adult , Aged , Caloric Restriction/adverse effects , Caloric Restriction/economics , Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Food Quality , Food Supply/economics , France , Greenhouse Effect/prevention & control , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Policy , Nutrition Surveys , Nutritive Value , Patient Compliance , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...