ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To outline the management of a community cluster of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) cases, including key factors for decision making and the choice and implementation of control measures. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive report of cluster management. METHODS: Subtyping of IMD cases identified a number of potentially linked cases in a defined geographical area. An Incident Management Team (IMT) was convened to coordinate the public health response. A case definition was developed in order to identify further cases within the cluster. RESULTS: Four cases of IMD met the case definition and were initially considered as part of this cluster. Three resided in the same small town, which was the focus for public health management. The IMT agreed that it would be proportionate to instigate additional control measures. The population at higher risk of infection were identified, and a supplementary vaccination programme was rolled out in the community. Over five clinics, 45.6% (639/1401) of the target cohort received at least one dose of the vaccine, with 34.7% (486/1401) receiving both doses. Inequalities in uptake were observed by sex, age and deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Decision making for public health responses to IMD clusters is complex. Informed by epidemiological evidence, numerous partners engaged in collaborative decision making, which was critical for the effective implementation of the community response. Links between the local authority public health team and the community enabled the use of existing structures and relationships to maximise the number of vaccinations delivered. No further cases of IMD linked to this cluster were identified.
