Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for advanced primary vulvar cancer.

BACKGROUND: In advanced stage primary vulvar cancer, treatment is tailored to individual patient needs. Combined treatment modalities have been developed, using chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the combined treatment strategy using concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery is effective and safe in vulvar cancer patients with advanced primary disease. Main outcomes of interest were: types of surgical intervention following chemoradiation and survival, recurrence and complication rates. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Specialised Register. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CANCERLIT, other databases and reference lists of articles. The latest search was conducted on 12 March 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies of curative treatment of patients with advanced, primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were included. Treatment included concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Twenty-eight abstracts and papers were selected either by the search strategy or by checking the cross references. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were not available. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. (Eifel 1995; Landoni 1996; Montana 2000; Moore 1998; Scheistroen 1993). Two authors (HCvD, MV-L) independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN RESULTS: Chemotherapy was given uniformly within each of the five selected studies. However, four different chemoradiation schedules were applied. Radiotherapy dose fractionation techniques, fields and target definitions varied. Skin toxicity was observed in nearly all patients. Wound breakdown, infection, lymphedema, lymphorrhea and lymphoceles were also common. Operability was achieved in 63 to 92% of cases in the four studies using 5FU and CDDP or 5FU and MMC. In contrast, only 20% of the patients who received Bleomycin were operable after chemoradiation. After a follow up of 5 to 125 months, 26 to 63% of participants were alive and well. A total of 27 to 85% of participants died due to treatment related causes or disease. The five studies included in this review show that preoperative chemoradiotherapy reduces tumour size and improves operability. However, complications of treatment are considerable and information on the effects of quality of life (QOL) is not available. Furthermore, treatment results of the respective studies diverge considerably. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inoperable primary tumours or lymph nodes benefit from chemoradiation if an operation can be performed. In patients with large tumours that can only be treated with anterior and/or posterior exenteration complications of neoadjuvant therapy might outweigh complications of exenterative surgery. With the current knowledge neoadjuvant therapy is not justified in patients with tumours that can be adequately treated with radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin node dissection alone.

Phase II study of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan was evaluated in a phase II study in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Twenty-seven patients received liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2)) infused at day 1, followed by topotecan (1 mg/m(2)) infusion daily for 5 days. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. This combination regimen showed an overall response rate of 28%. Median time to progression was 30 weeks, with a median overall survival of 40 weeks. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was shown in 70% of patients and grade 3/4 thrombopenia in 41% of patients. Neutropenic fever was reported in 11% of patients. After reviewing the first 12 patients, the internal review board decided to administer topotecan at a dose of 0.75 mg/m(2) and liposomal doxorubicin at 40 mg/m(2) for the remainder of the study. However, this adjustment did not lead to reduction in bone marrow toxicity nor to an improvement in dose intensity. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and mucositis were more reported in the second cohort but usually mild. The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan demonstrates favorable response data in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. However, substantial bone marrow toxicity limits further clinical use.

Radioimmunodiagnosis and therapy.

Although promising results with radioimmunotherapy and radioimmunodiagnosis in haematological diseases, have been reported, they are less encouraging results in solid tumours. Experimental mathematical models suggest that optimization of antibody-based therapy and diagnosis is possible and that further research towards improvement is warranted. In this review, the major problems of radioimmunotherapy and diagnosis are discussed. Particular items adressed include tumour uptake of antibodies and antibody-fragments, the target/non-target ratio, immunogenicity and the selection of radionuclides.

Interferon-alpha induced changes in CEA expression in patients with CEA-producing tumours.

Enhancement of antigen expression could result in improved tumour targeting using antibodies directed to the antigen. In this study we performed radioimmunoscintigraphy using 99mTc-CEA-Scan to analyse the effect of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in enhancing the expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in ten patients with CEA-producing tumours. Furthermore, we investigated the feasibility of a future therapeutic study with this antibody fragment labelled with rhenium-186. Although IFN-alpha gave rise to a significant increase in antibody uptake by the tumour, the absolute antibody uptake in the tumour appeared to be poor, with a mean of 0.475% of injected dose (ID) in the tumour before IFN-alpha, rising to 0.562% ID in the tumour after IFN-alpha. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated no significant alterations after IFN-alpha. In conclusion, the administration of IFN-alpha is an attractive way to achieve enhanced tumour targeting, although the increase was of little clinical significance in this patient population and using this antibody fragment.