[Experience of first COVID-19 patients in Northern part of the Netherlands: Information provision, source investigation, contact tracing and home isolation]. / Eerste covid-19-patiënten in Noord-Nederland.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate how patients experience the information, the source investigation and contact tracing and the measures in isolation at the start of a pandemic. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews was conducted as part of a larger exploratory mixed-methods study on COVID-19 patient experiences. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 people from Friesland and Groningen who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 9 March and 3 April 2020, recruited via maximum variation sampling. Thematic analysis was used. RESULTS: The following themes emerged from the analysis: 1) Information: Conflicting information by different advisors led to a lack of clarity. Patients admitted to hospital usually felt uninformed about the rules of home isolation after discharge. 2) Investigation into the source of infection: For most it was unclear whether and how this investigation took place. Some expected feedback on their suggestions. 3) Informing contacts: Not everyone felt able to inform the right contacts. Some felt stigmatized. 4) Living with the measures in home isolation: The recommended living rules were often not fully applied. Some patients felt insufficiently supported. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that not all COVID-19 patients felt well cared for at the start of the outbreak. Scaling down monitoring by the public health service can mean that questions about source and contact investigation and isolation remain unanswered or are answered by others. This leads to conflicting information and non-compliance with measures. The supervision of patients in isolation should be better guarded.

Reliability of popliteal angle measurement: a study in cerebral palsy patients and healthy controls.

UNLABELLED: The popliteal angle is a widely used clinical measure for hamstring contracture in cerebral palsy (CP) patients and in healthy individuals. The reliability of popliteal angle measurement is being questioned. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability of popliteal angle measurement by means of visual and goniometric assessment. METHODS: Three different observers measured the popliteal angle in 15 CP patients and 15 healthy volunteers. In each subject, popliteal angles were visually estimated and measured with a blinded goniometer twice by all observers with approximately 1 hour between measurement sessions. RESULTS: All intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were lower in the CP group compared with healthy controls. The ICC for intraobserver differences was higher than 0.75 for both groups. The ICC for interobserver reliability of visual estimates and goniometric measurements was low for both groups. Intermethod ICC was higher than 0.75 for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements in the CP group seemed to be less reliable than measurements in the control group. Intraobserver reliability is reasonable for both groups, but lower in CP patients than in controls. Interobserver reliability of both visual estimates and goniometrical measurements is poor. No significant differences in reliability have been found between visual estimation and goniometric measurement. Because of poor interobserver reliability of popliteal angle measurement, this should not be the only variable in clinical decision making in CP patients.

Does surgical management of the hand in children with spastic unilateral cerebral palsy affect functional outcome?

The aim of this review was to examine the literature on the effects of surgery of the spastic hand in children with cerebral palsy on functional outcome and muscle coordination. We performed a search of the relevant literature in Medline, Embase, and Biological Abstracts from 1966 to June 2006. The search resulted in eight studies on the effect of surgery on functional outcome and three studies on the effect of surgery on muscle coordination. Heterogeneity in outcome measures precluded meta-analysis. The studies revealed that -- at the level of impairment -- surgery has a positive effect on supination and dorsiflexion of the wrist. At the level of function, surgery might improve grip strategy and induce an increase of the repertoire of grips and spontaneous use of the hand. The evidence for the functional effects is, however, limited. Whether the possibly improved function is mediated by alterations in muscle coordination patterns remains unclear. The muscle coordination studies provided inconclusive results. We concluded that surgery improves the position of the hand and there are indications that it might improve hand function. Future research should address the question: does surgery improve hand function and, if so, is this due solely to a better hand position or does change in muscle coordination play an additional role?

Evaluation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening instrument.

Reliability and validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD-Q) was assessed using a population-based sample of 608 children (311 males, 297 females; mean age 7 y 8 mo [SD 2 y 4 mo]), a sample of 55 children with DCD referred to a rehabilitation clinic, and a control sample of 55 children matched for age and sex (48 males, seven females in each sample; mean age 8 y 3 mo [SD 2 y]). The DCD-Q is reliable and valid in the age range for which the questionnaire was developed(8 y-14 y 7 mo) and in a younger age range (4-8 y). Sensitivity and specificity of the DCD-Q was assessed using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children as the criterion standard. The DCD-Q met the standard for sensitivity (80%) in the clinic-referred sample (81.6%), but not in the population-based sample (28.9%). Specificity almost reached the standard of 90%: 89% in the population-based sample and 84% in the clinic-referred sample.