APRIL/BLyS deficient rats prevent donor specific antibody (DSA) production and cell proliferation in rodent kidney transplant model.

APRIL (A proliferation inducing ligand) and BLyS (B Lymphocyte Stimulator) are two critical survival factors for B lymphocytes and plasma cells, the main source of alloantibody. We sought to characterize the specific effects of these cytokines in a kidney transplant model of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). We engineered APRIL-/- and BLyS-/- Lewis rats using CRISPR/Cas9. APRIL-/- and BLyS-/- rats were sensitized with Brown Norway (BN) blood (complete MHC mismatch). Twenty-one days following sensitization, animals were harvested and collected tissues were analyzed using flow cytometry, ELISPOT, and immunohistochemistry. Flow cross match and a 3 day mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) was performed to assess donor specific antibody (DSA) production and T-cell proliferation, respectively. Sensitized dual knock out Lewis rats (APRIL-/-/BLyS-/-) underwent kidney transplantation and were sacrificed on day 7 post-transplant. Sensitized BLyS-/- had significant decreases in DSA and cell proliferation compared to WT and APRIL-/- (p<0.02). Additionally, BLyS-/- rats had a significant reduction in IgG secreting cells in splenic marginal zone B lymphocytes, and in cell proliferation when challenged with alloantigen compared to WT and APRIL-/-. Transplanted APRIL-/-/BLyS-/- rodents had significantly less DSA and antibody secreting cells compared to WT (p<0.05); however, this did not translate into a significant difference in AMR seen between groups. In summary, our studies suggest that APRIL and BLyS play a greater role in DSA generation rather than AMR, highlighting the role of cellular pathways that regulate AMR.

Suppression of Inflammation-Associated Kidney Damage Post-Transplant Using the New PrC-210 Free Radical Scavenger in Rats.

Allograft kidney transplantation, which triggers host cellular- and antibody-mediated rejection of the kidney, is a major contributor to kidney damage during transplant. Here, we asked whether PrC-210 would suppress damage seen in allograft kidney transplant. Brown Norway (BN) rat kidneys were perfused in situ (UW Solution) with or without added 30 mM PrC-210, and then immediately transplanted into Lewis (LEW) rats. 20 h later, the transplanted BN kidneys and LEW rat plasma were analyzed. Kidney histology, and kidney/serum levels of several inflammation-associated cytokines, were measured to assess mismatch-related kidney pathology, and PrC-210 protective efficacy. Twenty hours after the allograft transplants: (i) significant histologic kidney tubule damage and mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration were seen in allograft kidneys; (ii) kidney function metrics (creatinine and BUN) were significantly elevated; (iii) significant changes in key cytokines, i.e., TIMP-1, TNF-alpha and MIP-3A/CCL20, and kidney activated caspase levels were seen. In PrC-210-treated kidneys and recipient rats, (i) kidney histologic damage (Banff Scores) and mononuclear infiltration were reduced to untreated background levels; (ii) creatinine and BUN were significantly reduced; and (iii) activated caspase and cytokine changes were significantly reduced, some to background. In conclusion, the results suggest that PrC-210 could provide broadly applicable organ protection for many allograft transplantation conditions; it could protect transplanted kidneys during and after all stages of the transplantation process-from organ donation, through transportation, re-implantation and the post-operative inflammation-to minimize acute and chronic rejection.

Significant Improvement in Rat Kidney Cold Storage Using UW Organ Preservation Solution Supplemented With the Immediate-Acting PrC-210 Free Radical Scavenger.

Ischemia-reperfusion injury, including injury from warm- and cold-ischemia (CI) organ storage, remains a significant problem for all solid organ transplants. Suppressing CI damage would reduce delayed graft function and increase the donor organ pool size. PrC-210 has demonstrated superior prevention of damage in several preclinical studies as an immediate-acting free-radical scavenger. Here, we describe its profound efficacy in suppressing CI injury in a rat kidney model. METHODS: Kidneys in 300 gm Sprague-Dawley rats were perfused in situ with UW solution with or without added PrC-210 and then stored at 4°C in the same solution for 0 to 48 hours. When procured, kidney-activated caspase-3 level (a marker of cell death) was measured, and direct histological analysis of kidneys was performed to assess PrC-210 protective efficacy. In vitro analyses of PrC-210-conferred protection to isolated rat kidneys or naked DNA were also performed. RESULTS: A single 15 seconds in situ perfusion of kidneys with 20 mmol/L PrC-210 in UW solution resulted in significant reductions in (1) 30-hour CI-induced kidney-activated caspase level (P < 0.0001); activated caspase was reduced to levels not significantly different than control activated caspase levels seen in unperturbed kidneys, (2) 30-hour CI-induced renal Tubular Injury Scores (P = 0.0004) where brush border and tubular necrosis were markedly reduced, (3) PrC-210 conferred 100% protection against ·OH damage to naked DNA and isolated kidney mitochondria while current UW solution antioxidants were without protective effect. CONCLUSIONS: A single PrC-210-UW solution perfusion of rat kidneys upon removal from the rat profoundly reduced caspase and renal tubular injury in kidneys exposed to 30 hours of CI organ storage. These findings support further development of the PrC-210 molecule to suppress or to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury in organ transplant and other ischemia-reperfusion injury settings.

Autoantibody production significantly decreased with APRIL/BLyS blockade in murine chronic rejection kidney transplant model.

Chronic antibody mediated rejection (cAMR) remains a significant barrier to achieving long-term graft survival in kidney transplantation, which results from alloantibody production from B lymphocytes and plasma cells. APRIL (A proliferation-inducing ligand) and BLyS (B lymphocyte stimulator) are critical survival factors for B lymphocytes and plasma cells. Here we describe the results of APRIL/BLyS blockade in a murine cAMR kidney transplant model. c57/B6 mice underwent kidney transplantation with Bm12 kidneys (minor MHC mismatch), a well-described model for chronic rejection where animals cannot make donor specific antibody but rather make antinuclear antibody (ANA). Following transplantation, animals received TACI-Ig (to block APRIL and BLyS) or no treatment. Animals were continued on treatment until harvest 4 weeks following transplant. Serum was analyzed for circulating anti-nuclear autoantibodies using HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence. Spleen and transplanted kidneys were analyzed via H&E. ANA production was significantly decreased in APRIL/BLyS blockade treated animals (p<0.0001). No significant difference in autoantibody production was found between syngeneic transplant control (B6 to B6) and APRIL/BLyS blockade treated animals (p = 0.90). Additionally, disruption of splenic germinal center architecture was noted in the APRIL/BLyS blockade treated animals. Despite the significant decrease in autoantibody production and germinal center disruption, no significant difference in lymphocyte infiltration was noted in the transplanted kidney. APRIL/BLyS blockade resulted in a significant decrease of autoantibody production and disrupted splenic germinal center formation in a chronic kidney transplant model, however in this model no difference in kidney transplant pathology was seen, which may have to do with the absence of any T cell centric immunosuppression. Regardless, these findings suggest that APRIL/BLyS blockade may play a role in decreasing antibody formation long-term in kidney transplantation. Future investigations will use APRIL/BLyS blockade in conjunction with T lymphocyte depleting agents to determine its efficacy in chronic rejection.

APRIL/BLyS Blockade Reduces Donor-specific Antibodies in Allosensitized Mice.

BACKGROUND: Highly sensitized candidates on the transplant waitlist remain a significant challenge, as current desensitization protocols have variable success rates of donor-specific antibody (DSA) reduction. Therefore, improved therapies are needed. A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) and B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) are critical survival factors for B-lymphocytes and plasma cells, which are the primary sources of alloantibody production. We examined the effect of APRIL/BLyS blockade on DSA in a murine kidney transplant model as a possible novel desensitization strategy. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were sensitized with intraperitoneal (IP) injections of 2 × 10 BALB/c splenocytes. Twenty-one days following sensitization, animals were treated with 100 µg of BLyS blockade (B-cell activating factor receptor-immunoglobulin) or APRIL/BLyS blockade (transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor-immunoglobulin), administered thrice weekly for an additional 21 days. Animals were then euthanized or randomized to kidney transplant with Control Ig, BLyS blockade, or APRIL/BLyS blockade. Animals were euthanized 7 days posttransplant. B-lymphocytes and DSA of BLyS blockade only or APRIL/BLyS blockade-treated mice were assessed by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunospot. RESULTS: APRIL/BLyS inhibition resulted in a significant reduction of DSA by flow crossmatch compared with controls (P < 0.01). APRIL/BLyS blockade also significantly depleted IgM- and IgG-secreting cells and B-lymphocyte populations compared to controls (P < 0.0001). APRIL/BLyS blockade in transplanted mice also resulted in decreased B-lymphocyte populations; however, no difference in rejection rates were seen between groups. CONCLUSIONS: APRIL/BLyS blockade with transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor-immunoglobulin significantly depleted B-lymphocytes and reduced DSA in this sensitized murine model. APRIL/BLyS inhibition may be a clinically useful desensitization strategy for sensitized transplant candidates.

Desensitization and treatment with APRIL/BLyS blockade in rodent kidney transplant model.

Alloantibody represents a significant barrier in kidney transplant through the sensitization of patients prior to transplant through antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). APRIL BLyS are critical survival factors for mature B lymphocytes plasma cells, the primary source of alloantibody. We examined the effect of APRIL/BLyS blockade via TACI-Ig (Transmembrane activator calcium modulator cyclophilin lig interactor-Immunoglobulin) in a preclinical rodent model as treatment for both desensitization ABMR. Lewis rats were sensitized with Brown Norway (BN) blood for 21 days. Following sensitization, animals were then sacrificed or romized into kidney transplant (G4, sensitized transplant control); desensitization with TACI-Ig followed by kidney transplant (G5, sensitized + pre-transplant TACI-Ig); kidney transplant with post-transplant TACI-Ig for 21 days (G6, sensitized + post-transplant TACI-Ig); desensitization with TACI-Ig followed by kidney transplant post-transplant TACI-Ig for 21 days (G7, sensitized + pre- post-transplant TACI-Ig). Animals were sacrificed on day 21 post-transplant tissues were analyzed using flow cytometry, IHC, ELISPOT, RT-PCR. Sensitized animals treated with APRIL/BLyS blockade demonstrated a significant decrease in marginal zone non-switched B lymphocyte populations (p<0.01). Antibody secreting cells were also significantly reduced in the sensitized APRIL/BLyS blockade treated group. Post-transplant APRIL/BLyS blockade treated animals were found to have significantly less C4d deposition less ABMR as defined by Banff classification when compared to groups receiving APRIL/BLyS blockade before transplant or both before after transplant (p<0.0001). The finding of worse ABMR in groups receiving APRIL/BLyS blockade before both before after transplant may indicate that B lymphocyte depletion in this setting also resulted in regulatory lymphocyte depletion resulting in a worse rejection. Data presented here demonstrates that the targeting of APRIL BLyS can significantly deplete mature B lymphocytes, antibody secreting cells, effectively decrease ABMR when given post-transplant in a sensitized animal model.

Complete B Cell Deficiency Reduces Allograft Inflammation and Intragraft Macrophages in a Rat Kidney Transplant Model.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, it is being appreciated that B cells have broad roles beyond the humoral response and are able to contribute to and regulate inflammation. The specific role of B cells in the pathogenesis of early allograft inflammation remains unclear. METHODS: To address this question, we generated B cell-deficient (B) Lewis rats via clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology. In a full mismatch transplant model, kidneys from Brown Norway donors were transplanted into B Lewis recipients or wild type Lewis recipients. T cell-mediated rejection was attenuated with cyclosporine. RESULTS: Renal inflammation was reduced at 1 week after transplant (Banff scores for interstitial inflammation, microvascular inflammation, glomerulitis, and C4d) in allografts from B recipients. The reduction in interstitial inflammation was predominantly due to a decline in graft infiltrating macrophages. Intragraft T-cell numbers remained unchanged. In addition, B-cell deficiency was associated with increased T regulatory cells and reduced splenic T follicular helper cells at baseline; and significantly increased intragraft and splenic IL-10 mRNA levels after transplant. In vitro, B and wild type splenic T cells produced similar levels of IFN-γ in response to T cell-specific activation. CONCLUSIONS: B-cell deficiency in this model produced an anti-inflammatory phenotype with a shift toward regulatory T-cell populations, production of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10), and a reduction in allograft inflammation. These findings define a role for B cells to influence the cell populations and mediators involved in the pathogenesis of early allograft inflammation.

The role of p53 in radiation therapy outcomes for favorable-to-intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Some prostate cancers may have molecular alterations that render them less responsive to radiation therapy; identification of these alterations before treatment might allow improved treatment optimization. This study investigated whether p53, a potential molecular determinant, could predict long-term radiation therapy outcome in a restricted group of relatively favorable-risk prostate cancer patients treated uniformly with irradiation alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study included 53 patients previously treated with radiotherapy for favorable-to-intermediate-risk prostate cancer. These patients were selected for relatively low pretreatment PSAs (< or =21 ng/mL) and Gleason scores (< or =7) to decrease the likelihood of nonlocalized disease, because disease localization was necessary to examine the efficacy of localized radiation therapy. The status of p53 was immunohistochemically assessed in paraffin-embedded pretreatment biopsy specimens, along with appropriate controls. This marker was selected based upon a usable mutation prevalence in early-stage prostate cancer and its potential linkage with radiation response via cell cycle, DNA repair, and cell death pathways. Correlation between p53 mutation and clinical outcome was analyzed in univariate and multivariate fashion and included conventional prognosticators, such as stage, grade, and PSA. Freedom from biochemical failure was determined using American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria. Limitations of prior studies were potentially avoided by requiring adequate posttreatment follow-up (median follow-up in nonfailing patients of 5.1 years), as well as pretreatment PSA and Gleason scores that suggested localized disease, and uniformity of treatment. RESULTS: The total group of 53 favorable-to-intermediate-risk patients demonstrated an actuarial biochemical failure rate of 35% at 5 years. Forty percent of all specimens had a greater than 10% labeling index for p53 mutation, and actuarial biochemical control was found to strongly and independently correlate with p53 status. Patients with higher p53 labeling indices demonstrated significantly higher PSA failure rates (p < 0.001). In contrast, p53 status did not correlate with pretreatment PSA, grade, or tumor stage. Similarly, pretreatment PSA (log-rank 0.22), Gleason score (log-rank 0.93), and T stage (log-rank 0.15) were not prognostic for outcome in this group of patients selected for their relatively favorable clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: (1) p53 status in pretreatment biopsies strongly predicted for long-term biochemical control after radiation therapy in favorable-to-intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. (2) If validated in other independent clinical data sets, p53 status should be considered as a stratification factor in future clinical trials and could be useful in guiding treatment. Abnormal p53 status might favor surgical management, aggressive dose escalation, or p53-targeted therapy.