Validation of a 3D-printed model of cryptoglandular perianal fistulas.

INTRODUCTION: Visualising the course of a complex perianal fistula on imaging can be difficult. It has been postulated that three-dimensional (3D) models of perianal fistulas improve understanding of the perianal pathology, contribute to surgical decision-making and might even improve future outcomes of surgical treatment. The aim of the current study is to investigate the accuracy of 3D-printed models of perianal fistulas compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: MRI scans of 15 patients with transsphincteric and intersphincteric fistulas were selected and then assessed by an experienced abdominal and colorectal radiologist. A standardised method of creating a 3D-printed anatomical model of cryptoglandular perianal fistula was developed by a technical medical physicist and a surgeon in training with special interest in 3D printing. Manual segmentation of the fistula and external sphincter was performed by a trained technical medical physicist. The anatomical models were 3D printed in a 1:1 ratio and assessed by two colorectal surgeons. The 3D-printed models were then scanned with a 3D scanner. Volume of the 3D-printed model was compared with manual segmentation. Inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated for consistency between the radiologist who assessed the MRI scans and the surgeons who assessed the 3D-printed models. The assessment of the MRI was considered the 'gold standard'. Agreement between the two surgeons who assessed the 3D printed models was also determined. RESULTS: Consistency between the radiologist and the surgeons was almost perfect for classification (κ = 0.87, κ = 0.87), substantial for complexity (κ = 0.73, κ = 0.74) and location of the internal orifice (κ = 0.73, κ = 0.73) and moderate for the percentage of involved external anal sphincter in transsphincteric fistulas (ICC 0.63, ICC 0.52). Agreement between the two surgeons was substantial for classification (κ = 0.73), complexity (κ = 0.74), location of the internal orifice (κ = 0.75) and percentage of involved external anal sphincter in transsphincteric fistulas (ICC 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Our 3D-printed anatomical models of perianal fistulas are an accurate reflection of the MRI. Further research is needed to determine the added value of 3D-printed anatomical models in preoperative planning and education.

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the oldest old is safe: the race is run.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is considered to be the gold standard for managing rectal prolapse. Nevertheless, concerns have been expressed about the use of this procedure in elderly patients. The aim of the current study was to examine the perioperative safety of primary LVMR operations in the oldest old in comparison to younger individuals and to assess our hospital policy of offering LVMR to all patients, regardless of age and morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective study analysed demographic information, operation notes, meshes utilised, operation times, lengths of hospital stay (LOS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of patients who underwent LVMR at Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital between 2012 and 2023. RESULTS: Eighty-seven female patients underwent LVMR. Nineteen patients were 80 years of age or older (OLD group); the remaining 65 patients were under the age of 80 (YOUNG group). The difference between the groups in terms of age was statistically significant. ASA scores were not significantly different. No mortality was observed. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of LOS, operation time or morbidity. Moreover, the postoperative morbidity profile was excellent in both groups. CONCLUSION: LVMR seems to be a safe operation for the "oldest old" patients with comorbidity, despite a single-centre, retrospective trial with limited follow-up. The present study suggests abandoning the dogma that "frail patients with rectal prolapse are not suitable for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy."

Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton.

BACKGROUND: Loose setons are often utilized. Replacements after seton loss are frequent, but the exact incidence of this loss of seton (LOS) in patients is unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of LOS in a population with complex anal fistula, comparing the knot-free loose seton with the conventional knotted loose seton. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with a loose seton for complex anal fistula in two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in the present study. The incidence of loss of a conventional knotted loose seton was compared with the loss of commercially available knot-free setons. RESULTS: There were 212 patients. Fifty-two patients were included in the knotted loose group and 160 patients were included in the knot-free seton group. Sixteen patients who were treated with both a knotted and a knot-free loose seton were included in both groups. The incidence of LOS was 12% in the knotted seton group and 28% in the knot-free loose seton group (p = 0.02). Median time to LOS was 36 days for the knotted loose seton and 89 days for the knot-free loose seton (p = 0.36). Sex (p = 0.61), age at the time of seton placement (p = 0.60), and presence of inflammatory bowel disease (p = 0.28) were not significantly associated with LOS. CONCLUSIONS: LOS occurs frequently in patients treated for complex anal fistulas. The incidence of LOS is significantly higher in patients treated with a knot-free loose seton. Further developments in seton manufacturing should be focussed on optimisation of the closure mechanism.