Myocardial protection during coronary angioplasty with autoperfusion and forced perfusion: an in vitro comparison.

During coronary angioplasty, perfusion distal to the inflated angioplasty balloon can be maintained with autoperfusion balloon catheters and coronary perfusion pumps. The blood flow rates through the autoperfusion balloon catheters and the flow rates achieved with a perfusion pump were compared in vitro with fresh human blood at 37 degrees C. In a specially designed system, blood flow rates through Stack autoperfusion balloon catheters were measured at 40, 60 and 80 mmHg continuous pressure. In another system, driving pressures were measured during perfusion with the pump, through a specially designed forced perfusion catheter at 20, 40 and 60 ml/min flow. The pressure applied in the autoperfusion experiments was converted into atmospheres (atm) to facilitate comparison with the driving pressures measured during pumping (1 mmHg = 1.316 x 10(-3) atm). Mean flow rates through the autoperfusion balloon catheters were: 46 ml/min at 0.05 atm, 66 ml/min at 0.09 atm and 75 ml/min at 0.1 atm. Mean pressures during pumping were: 1.8 atm at 20 ml/min, 3.5 atm at 40 ml/min, 5 atm at 60 ml/min. Due to the phasic nature of coronary blood flow, the flow through autoperfusion balloons is generally lower than the minimum required for adequate myocardial protection (= 60 ml/min). Thus, autoperfusion balloon catheters are simpler and cheaper devices than perfusion pumps, but generally they are not able to provide adequate myocardial protection.

In vitro evaluation of blood flow through autoperfusion balloon catheters.

The effective flow rates with human blood through an autoperfusion catheter cannot be monitored in vivo and have not been experimentally determined in vitro. The manufacturers (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems [ACS], Temecula, CA) have suggested that "the flow rate" through the Stack over the wire and the RX-60 monorail catheter is 60 ml/min with a pressure gradient of 80 mmHg. We measured human blood flow rates in vitro through these catheters under different continuous pressure regimens (between 40 and 120 mmHg), with varying hematocrit levels (between 25% and 62%). Measured blood flows at a gradient of 80 mmHg were found to vary from 32 to 65 cc/min, with hematocrit levels of 62-25%. Minor variations in the circuitry, besides the viscosity of the medium, cause significant changes in observed flow rates (such as kinking of the catheter and blood sedimentation). In vitro determinations of blood flows cannot automatically be transferred to the in vivo condition, primarily because in vitro determinations do not account for the systolic intramural pressure increase (which may overcome the aortic pressure). If such a phenomenon is also considered, then the in vitro flow rates reported here should be multiplied by a factor of 0.40-0.60 to determine effective in vivo flow rates. Such information is relevant for the clinical operator of angioplasty, especially in the treatment of patients at high risk for undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.