Genotype versus phenotype in families with androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome encompasses a wide range of phenotypes, which are caused by numerous different mutations in the AR gene. Detailed information on the genotype/phenotype relationship in androgen insensitivity syndrome is important for sex assignment, treatment of androgen insensitivity syndrome patients, genetic counseling of their families, and insight into the functional domains of the AR. The commonly accepted concept of dependence on fetal androgens of the development of Wolffian ducts was studied in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) patients. In a nationwide survey in The Netherlands, all cases (n = 49) with the presumptive diagnosis androgen insensitivity syndrome known to pediatric endocrinologists and clinical geneticists were studied. After studying the clinical phenotype, mutation analysis and functional analysis of mutant receptors were performed using genital skin fibroblasts and in vitro expression studies. Here we report the findings in families with multiple affected cases. Fifty-nine percent of androgen insensitivity syndrome patients had other affected relatives. A total of 17 families were studied, seven families with CAIS (18 patients), nine families with partial androgen insensitivity (24 patients), and one family with female prepubertal phenotypes (two patients). No phenotypic variation was observed in families with CAIS. However, phenotypic variation was observed in one-third of families with partial androgen insensitivity resulting in different sex of rearing and differences in requirement of reconstructive surgery. Intrafamilial phenotypic variation was observed for mutations R846H, M771I, and deletion of amino acid N682. Four newly identified mutations were found. Follow-up in families with different AR gene mutations provided information on residual androgen action in vivo and the development of the prepubertal and adult phenotype. Patients with a functional complete defective AR had some pubic hair, Tanner stage P2, and vestigial Wolffian duct derivatives despite absence of AR expression. Vaginal length was functional in most but not all CAIS patients. The minimal incidence of androgen insensitivity syndrome in The Netherlands, based on patients with molecular proof of the diagnosis is 1:99,000. Phenotypic variation was absent in families with CAIS, but distinct phenotypic variation was observed relatively frequent in families with partial androgen insensitivity. Molecular observations suggest that phenotypic variation had different etiologies among these families. Sex assignment of patients with partial androgen insensitivity cannot be based on a specific identified AR gene mutation because distinct phenotypic variation in partial androgen insensitivity families is relatively frequent. In genetic counseling of partial androgen insensitivity families, this frequent occurrence of variable expression resulting in differences in sex of rearing and/or requirement of reconstructive surgery is important information. During puberty or normal dose androgen therapy, no or only minimal virilization may occur even in patients with significant (but still deficient) prenatal virilization. Wolffian duct remnants remain detectable but differentiation does not occur in the absence of a functional AR. In many CAIS patients, surgical elongation of the vagina is not indicated.

Phenotypic variation in a family with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome explained by differences in 5alpha dihydrotestosterone availability.

Mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene result in a wide range of phenotypes of the androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Inter- and intrafamilial differences in the phenotypic expression of identical AR mutations are known, suggesting modifying factors in establishing the phenotype. Two 46,XY siblings with partial AIS sharing the same AR gene mutation, R846H, but showing very different phenotypes are studied. Their parents are first cousins. One sibling with grade 5 AIS was raised as a girl; the other sibling with grade 3 AIS was raised as a boy. In both siblings serum levels of hormones were measured; a sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) suppression test was completed; and mutation analysis of the AR gene, Scatchard, and SDS-PAGE analysis of the AR protein was performed. Furthermore, 5alpha-reductase 2 expression and activity in genital skin fibroblasts were investigated, and the 5alpha-reductase 2 gene was sequenced. The decrease in SHBG serum levels in a SHBG suppression test did not suggest differences in androgen sensitivity as the cause of the phenotypic variation. Also, androgen binding characteristics of the AR, AR expression levels, and the phosphorylation pattern of the AR on hormone binding were identical in both siblings. However, 5alpha-reductase 2 activity was normal in genital skin fibroblasts from the phenotypic male patient but undetectable in genital skin fibroblasts from the phenotypic female patient. The lack of 5alpha-reductase 2 activity was due to absent or reduced expression of 5alpha-reductase 2 in genital skin fibroblasts from the phenotypic female patient. Exon and flanking intron sequences of the 5alpha-reductase 2 gene showed no mutations in either sibling. Additional intragenic polymorphic marker analysis gave no evidence for different inherited alleles for the 5alpha-reductase 2 gene in the two siblings. Therefore, the absent or reduced expression of 5alpha-reductase 2 is likely to be additional to the AIS. Distinct phenotypic variation in this family was caused by 5alpha-reductase 2 deficiency, additional to AIS. This 5alpha-reductase deficiency is due to absence of expression of the 5alpha-reductase iso-enzyme 2 as shown by molecular studies. The distinct phenotypic variation in AIS here is explained by differences in the availability of 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone during embryonic sex differentiation.

Molecular analysis of the androgen-receptor gene in a family with receptor-positive partial androgen insensitivity: an unusual type of intronic mutation.

In the coding part and the intron-exon boundaries of the androgen-receptor gene of a patient with partial androgen insensitivity, no mutation was found. The androgen receptor of this patient displayed normal ligand-binding parameters and migrated as a 110-112-kD doublet on SDS-PAGE in the absence of hormone. However, after culturing of the patient's genital skin fibroblasts in the presence of hormone, the slower-migrating 114-kD protein, which reflects hormone-dependent phosphorylation, was hardly detectable. Furthermore, receptor protein was undetectable in the nuclear fraction of the fibroblasts, after treatment with hormone, which is indicative of defective DNA binding. By sequencing part of intron 2, a T-->A mutation was found 11 bp upstream of exon 3. In our screening of 102 chromosomes from unrelated individuals, this base-pair substitution was not found, indicating that it was not a polymorphism. mRNA analysis revealed that splicing involved a cryptic splice site, located 71/70 bp upstream of exon 3, resulting in generation of mRNA with an insert of 69 nucleotides. In addition, a small amount of a transcript with a deleted exon 3 and a very low level of wild-type transcript were detected. Translation of the extended transcript resulted in an androgen-receptor protein with 23 amino acid residues inserted between the two zinc clusters, displaying defective DNA binding and defective transcription activation.

Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity.

Mutations in the androgen receptor gene in 46,XY individuals can be associated with the androgen insensitivity syndrome, of which the phenotype can vary from a female phenotype to an undervirilized or infertile male phenotype. We have studied the androgen receptor gene of androgen insensitivity patients to get information about amino acid residues or regions involved in DNA binding and transcription activation. Genomic DNA was analysed by PCR-SSCP under two different conditions. Three new mutations were found in exon 1 of three patients with a female phenotype. A cytosine insertion at codon 42 resulted in a frameshift and consequently in the introduction of a premature stop at codon 171. Deletion of an adenine at codon 263 gave rise to a premature stop at codon 292. In both these cases, receptor protein was not detectable and hormone binding was not measurable. In a third patient, a guanine-to-adenine transition at codon 493 converted a tryptophan codon into a stop codon. Genital skin fibroblasts from this patient were not available. In exon 2 of the androgen receptor gene of a patient with receptor-positive androgen insensitivity, a cytosine-to-adenine transition, converting alanine 564 into an aspartic acid residue, resulted in defective DNA binding and transactivation. In three other receptor-positive androgen insensitivity patients no mutations were found with PCR-SSCP.

A practical approach to the detection of androgen receptor gene mutations and pedigree analysis in families with x-linked androgen insensitivity.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) is an X-linked disorder in which defects in the androgen receptor gene have prevented the normal development of both internal and external male structures in 46,XY individuals. This survey reports the analysis of 11 AIS subjects. The androgen receptor gene of these subjects was analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and sequencing or sequencing of PCR-amplified androgen receptor gene fragments alone. In total, 10 single base changes and one partial gene deletion were detected. Seven single base changes resulted in an amino acid change, one resulted in the introduction of a premature stop codon, one event represented a single base insertion resulting in a frame-shift, and one single base change affected a donor splice site. The androgen receptor protein in genital skin fibroblasts from several patients was studied with respect to molecular mass after immunoprecipitation and SDS-PAGE. Two patients expressed a truncated receptor protein in agreement with the established genomic mutation. Pedigree analysis was performed to identify possible carriers for the syndrome in families of AIS patients using single-strand conformation polymorphism and restriction site analysis of PCR products. In one case, the polymorphic (CAG)n(CAA) repeat in exon 1 encoding a polyglutamine stretch was used to identify the mutant allele in a family with X-linked partial androgen insensitivity before the identification of the actual genomic mutation. PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis proved to be a fast and reliable technique to screen for androgen receptor gene mutations and to study the androgen receptor gene of family members of AIS-affected individuals.

Androgen receptor status in localized and locally progressive hormone refractory human prostate cancer.

Heterogeneity in human androgen receptor (hAR) expression in prostate cancer is considered to be implicated in tumor progression. hAR expression was therefore studied immunohistochemically in localized and locally progressive, hormone refractory (HR) prostate cancer. Because altered functional activity of the hAR may be due to changes in the structural integrity of the hAR gene, exons 2 to 8 of the hAR gene were assessed for mutations by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and exon 1 was analyzed for the size of the CAG repeat. The hormone binding capacity, a prerequisite for ligand-regulated receptor function, was determined by a ligand binding assay. Coexpression of the hAR and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was studied by a sequential double immunoenzymatic staining to verify whether PSA expression is a parameter of hAR function. Almost all human prostatic carcinomas revealed heterogeneous hAR expression, regardless of tumor differentiation and progression. Putative predominance of hAR-negative tumor areas in HR prostate cancer was not observed. No hAR gene mutations or major changes in the CAG repeat were found in the 18 HR carcinomas or in the 9 control samples. Moreover, all selected hAR-expressing cancers were able to bind the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R1881). Immunoenzymatic double staining revealed even PSA expression in hAR-negative tumor areas. PSA immunohistochemistry in human prostatic carcinomas therefore is of no use in determining hAR functional activity. Thus, most prostatic carcinomas, even when progressed to a state of hormone insensitivity, contain a structurally intact hAR gene, heterogeneously expressed with retained androgen binding capacity.

Differential splicing of human androgen receptor pre-mRNA in X-linked Reifenstein syndrome, because of a deletion involving a putative branch site.

The analysis of the androgen receptor (AR) gene, mRNA, and protein in a subject with X-linked Reifenstein syndrome (partial androgen insensitivity) is reported. The presence of two mature AR transcripts in genital skin fibroblasts of the patient is established, and, by reverse transcriptase-PCR and RNase transcription analysis, the wild-type transcript and a transcript in which exon 3 sequences are absent without disruption of the translational reading frame are identified. Sequencing and hybridization analysis show a deletion of > 6 kb in intron 2 of the human AR gene, starting 18 bp upstream of exon 3. The deletion includes the putative branch-point sequence (BPS) but not the acceptor splice site on the intron 2/exon 3 boundary. The deletion of the putative intron 2 BPS results in 90% inhibition of wild-type splicing. The mutant transcript encodes an AR protein lacking the second zinc finger of the DNA-binding domain. Western/immunoblotting analysis is used to show that the mutant AR protein is expressed in genital skin fibroblasts of the patient. The residual 10% wild-type transcript can be the result of the use of a cryptic BPS located 63 bp upstream of the intron 2/exon 3 boundary of the mutant AR gene. The mutated AR protein has no transcription-activating potential and does not influence the transactivating properties of the wild-type AR, as tested in cotransfection studies. It is concluded that the partial androgen-insensitivity syndrome of this patient is the consequence of the limited amount of wild-type AR protein expressed in androgen target cells, resulting from the deletion of the intron 2 putative BPS.

Threonine on amino acid position 868 in the human androgen receptor is essential for androgen binding specificity and functional activity.

The human androgen receptor gene in the androgen sensitive prostate tumor cell line (LNCaP) contains a point mutation in codon 868 resulting in the substitution of threonine by alanine. This amino acid change is responsible for the increased affinity of the mutant receptor protein for progestagens and estrogens. To further elucidate the role of threonine 868 on androgen binding capacity, specificity and functional activity, threonine 868 was substituted by six different amino acid residues. Substitution by aspartic acid, lysine or tyrosine totally eliminated androgen binding and the mutated androgen receptors did not have any transcriptional activating potential with either R1881, R5020 or estradiol. Introduction of a serine or an alanine broadened the steroid specificity, as did the introduction of a cysteine to a lesser degree. It is concluded that threonine on position 868 of the human androgen receptor limits the ligand specificity of the receptor to androgens.