Referral from well-child care clinics to dental clinics leads to earlier initiation of preventive dental visits: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: An ealy first preventive dental visit for children is recommended no later than twelve months. However, still many children have their first dental visit relatively late. AIM: To evaluate whether active or passive referral by a well-child care (WCC) physician of babies for a first preventive dental visit leads to earlier initiation of dental care. DESIGN: From WCC clinics in two Dutch regions, 629 parents of babies participated. Parents received an active referral from a WCC physician for a dental visit for their babies (n = 204) or received care as usual (CAU) (n = 136) in one region and a passive referral (n = 143) or CAU (n = 146) in the other region. Active referral involved parents receiving a scheduled appointment at the dental practice, and passive referral involved parents making an appointment themselves. During the WCC visit, parents completed a baseline questionnaire. At age 2.5 years, parents received a follow-up questionnaire about dental attendance. RESULTS: Of the active referral intervention group, 59.3% had their first preventive dental visit in their first year compared with 3.7% in the CAU group (p < .001); for the passive referral group, 46.9% compared with 9.6% (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Referral of babies by WCC for their first preventive dental visit leads to earlier initiation of dental care. An active referral had a larger effect than passive referral.

Long-term effects of a community-based oral health intervention for young children in the Netherlands: A 5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether referral of parents of 6 months old children by a well-child care (WCC) clinic medical practitioner for an early first dental visit combined with the Non Operative Caries Treatment and Prevention (NOCTP) approach in dental practices was effective to maintain oral health in children. METHODS: The study was conducted as a quasi-experimental comparative pre-post trial with a baseline measurement before the intervention. In total 1347 children were allocated at the age of 6 months and 306 children (intervention group: n = 166; care as usual (CAU) group: n = 140) underwent an oral examination at 5 years of age and their parents completed a questionnaire. Nonparametric tests and Hurdle models were used to determine differences in caries experience between the intervention and CAU groups. RESULTS: Children in the intervention group had significantly lower caries experience (d1,2,3 mfs) than children in the CAU group (Median = 2 vs. 5, r = .15, p < .01). Children in the intervention group had significantly fewer inactive caries lesions compared with children in the CAU group (Median = 2 vs. 3, r = .18, p < .001). No differences were found for dentin caries experience and also no differences for active caries lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Referral of parents of newborns for a preventive first dental visit by a WCC medical practitioner combined with NOCTP in dental practices may offer a new opportunity to reduce enamel caries lesions in young children.

Validity of data collection methods for time spent, professional involvement and treatment volume for the purpose of cost-effectiveness studies in dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: Economic evaluations can support provision of adequate and affordable oral care, requiring valid information on costs. The aim was to assess the validity of (a) patients' self-report (PS) and routine electronic patient records (EPR) regarding time spent per visit and (b) PS regarding types of treatment and type of dental professionals involved. METHODS: Data were collected in four dental clinics regarding time spent using PS and EPR, on types of treatment and dental professionals involved using PS. As reference standard for time spent, independent research assistants (RA) collected data on time per visit using stopwatches. As reference standard for types of treatment and of dental professionals involved, we used the dental clinic's Electronic Patient Files (DEPF). The two one-sided tests (TOST) equivalence procedure for the difference between paired means for time and kappa statistics for treatment and professional were used to assess agreement of data collection methods with the reference standards. RESULTS: Equivalence and agreement was good between (a) PS and RA registration concerning waiting time, appointment time and total time spent and (b) EPR and DEPF concerning appointment time. Agreement between PS and DEPF concerning types of treatment was moderate to fair (kappa values between 0.49 and 0.56 for preventive consultation, restoration, radiographs and extractions and between 0.15 and 0.26 for fluoride applications and sealants). Agreement between PS and DEPF for dental professional involved was fair (kappa = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Data collection regarding time using PS and EPR was valid. Data collection via PS on treatment and professionals involved were not sufficiently valid and should occur via DEPF.

Effectiveness of a short web-based film targeting parental oral health knowledge in a well-child care setting.

Young children rely on their parents with respect to oral health routines. However, parental knowledge on this topic is often insufficient. Well-child care may be an excellent route to reach parents because almost all of them attend. To evaluate the effectiveness of an 8.5 min web-based film about oral health, provided by well-child care, a non-blinded quasi-experimental study was performed. Parents attending well-child care clinics in the Netherlands were assigned to an intervention (n = 88) or control group (n = 41). The control group received care as usual. We measured parental knowledge of oral health with a questionnaire (range of scores 1-12) before and directly after the intervention, and 6 months later, and assessed differences between the intervention and the control group. Parental oral health knowledge improved after watching the film: the intervention group's mean score of 11.1 (SD 1.3) was greater than the mean score of 7.1 (SD 2.0) of the control group (Cohen's d = 2.64). Scores remained higher in the intervention group 6 months after watching the film (mean 9.1, SD 1.3) than before (Cohen's d = 1.25). A web-based educational film delivered in a well-child care setting can be an effective way to address oral health and to improve parental knowledge.