ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) in children is neglected, mainly due to a lack of sensitive diagnostic tools. Paediatric TB is now a global priority. More paediatric TB cases are being recorded as a result of the introduction of Xpert® Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF) (Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, USA). This study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children. METHODS: We recruited 70 paediatric patients with probable pulmonary TB and their gastric aspirate (GA), and induced sputum (IS) samples were collected between January 2021 and June 2022 in Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, at the Microbiology Department of the Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences (U.P.U.M.S.). All samples were subjected to smear examination, Bacterial Activation of Continuous Temperature and Environmental Control - Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (BACTEC-MGIT) culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF. RESULTS: The specimens included 70 GAs and 70 IS samples. The total number of specimens were 140 and we collected GA as well as IS from each of the patient enrolled in the study. When compared to microscopy, GeneXpert provides a quicker and earlier detection of paediatric TB. The sensitivity of the cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test (CBNAAT) against mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) was 75.0% for GA samples and 63.64% for IS samples. CONCLUSION: Paediatric TB, owing to its paucibacillary nature and difficulty in the collection of samples, makes the diagnosis difficult by conventional methods. Our study shows that smear and culture yield in GA samples are superior to those of IS samples and the sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay is also significantly different in GA and IS samples, but a combination of GA and IS yielded the best results.
ABSTRACT
Understanding the etiology of a disease such as prostate cancer may help in identifying populations at high risk, timely intervention of the disease, and proper treatment. Biomarkers, along with exposure history and clinical data, are useful tools to achieve these goals. Individual risk and population incidence of prostate cancer result from the intervention of genetic susceptibility and exposure. Biochemical, epigenetic, genetic, and imaging biomarkers are used to identify people at high risk for developing prostate cancer. In cancer epidemiology, epigenetic biomarkers offer advantages over other types of biomarkers because they are expressed against a person's genetic background and environmental exposure, and because abnormal events occur early in cancer development, which includes several epigenetic alterations in cancer cells. This article describes different biomarkers that have potential use in studying the epidemiology of prostate cancer. We also discuss the characteristics of an ideal biomarker for prostate cancer, and technologies utilized for biomarker assays. Among epigenetic biomarkers, most reports indicate GSTP1 hypermethylation as the diagnostic marker for prostate cancer; however, NKX2-5, CLSTN1, SPOCK2, SLC16A12, DPYS, and NSE1 also have been reported to be regulated by methylation mechanisms in prostate cancer. Current challenges in utilization of biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and epidemiologic studies and potential solutions also are discussed.