ABSTRACT
The total operating costs of small-scale monoclonal antibody production were calculated for two different upstream options and general downstream procedure based on protein A chromatography. The upstream options were a spin-filter equipped stirred-tank bioreactor (STR) and a hollow fiber bioreactor (HFB). Both the bioreactors were operated in perfusion mode. The total operating costs of the processes were 6,900 /g for STR option and 6,400 /g for the HFB option. In the both systems, the costs were dominated by expenses derived from the downstream section (almost 80%) that was almost identical in the both systems. In the upstream section, the investment depreciation was the largest cost item. The lower total costs of the HFB option were a result of lower investment costs and more concentrated product that led into savings also in downstream section. This study brings out the HFB as on viable alternative for stirred-tank bioreactor, especially in small-scale diagnostic monoclonal antibody production.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/economics , Batch Cell Culture Techniques/methods , Bioreactors/economics , Biotechnology/methods , Antibodies, Monoclonal/metabolism , Batch Cell Culture Techniques/economics , Batch Cell Culture Techniques/instrumentation , Biotechnology/economics , Biotechnology/instrumentation , Humans , Hybridomas/metabolismABSTRACT
Three popular expression host systems Escherichia coli, Pichia pastoris and Drosophila S2 were analyzed techno-economically using HIV-1 Nef protein as the model product. On scale of 100 mg protein, the labor costs corresponded to 52-83% of the manufacturing costs. When analyzing the cost impact of the different phases (strain/cell line construction, bioreactor production, and primary purification), we found that with the microbial host systems the strain construction phase was most significant generating 56% (E. coli) and 72% (P. pastoris) of the manufacturing costs, whereas with the Drosophila S2 system the cell line construction and bioreactor production phases were equally significant (46 and 47% of the total costs, respectively). With different titers and production goal of 100 mg of Nef protein, the costs of P. pastoris and Drosophila S2 systems were about two and four times higher than the respective costs of the E. coli system. When equal titers and bioreactor working volumes (10 L) were assumed for all three systems, the manufacturing costs of the bioreactor production of the P. pastoris and Drosophila S2 systems were about two and 2.5 times higher than the respective costs of the E. coli system.
