Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0152509, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27028128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite much debate, there is little evidence on consequences of consent procedures for residual tissue use. Here, we investigated these consequences for the availability of residual tissue for medical research, clinical practice, and patient informedness. METHODS: We conducted a randomised clinical trial with three arms in six hospitals. Participants, patients from whom tissue had been removed for diagnosis or treatment, were randomised to one of three arms: informed consent, an opt-out procedure with active information provision (opt-out plus), and an opt-out procedure without active information provision. Participants received a questionnaire six weeks post-intervention; a subsample of respondents was interviewed. Health care providers completed a pre- and post-intervention questionnaire. We assessed percentage of residual tissue samples available for medical research, and patient and health care provider satisfaction and preference. Health care providers and outcome assessors could not be blinded. RESULTS: We randomised 1,319 patients, 440 in the informed consent, 434 in the opt-out plus, and 445 in the opt-out arm; respectively 60.7%, 100%, and 99.8% of patients' tissue samples could be used for medical research. Of the questionnaire respondents (N = 224, 207, and 214 in the informed consent, opt-out plus, and opt-out arms), 71%, 69%, and 31%, respectively, indicated being (very) well informed. By questionnaire, the majority (53%) indicated a preference for informed consent, whereas by interview, most indicated a preference for opt-out plus (37%). Health care providers (N = 35) were more likely to be (very) satisfied with opt-out plus than with informed consent (p = 0.002) or opt-out (p = 0.039); the majority (66%) preferred opt-out plus. CONCLUSION: We conclude that opt-out with information (opt-out plus) is the best choice to balance the consequences for medical research, patients, and clinical practice, and is therefore the most optimal consent procedure for residual tissue use in Dutch hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR2982.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 16(5): 602-7, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19236464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Population screening for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (AAA) is still not implemented in any country, despite proven benefit both in decreased mortality and in cost effectiveness. Detecting a subpopulation with higher prevalence of AAA may alter this situation. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2005, all patients with a stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) admitted to the department of Neurology of a community-based hospital were classified according to the Toast criteria and enrolled in a prospective study to assess the diameter of the abdominal aorta. The diameter was assessed by ultrasonography. A written questionnaire and blood tests were used to assess risk factors. RESULTS: The prevalence of AAA amongst the 499 screened patients in the study was 5.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-6.0%]. Of the risk factors or Toast criteria, only male gender and age over 59 years correlated significantly with AAA. In the subgroup of 235 men aged over 59 years, the prevalence of AAA was 11.1% (95% CI 10.4-11.8%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AAA in men over 59 years of age presenting with a stroke or TIA is nearly twofold increased (11.1%) compared with all patients. Therefore, screening for AAA in this subgroup of patients seems beneficial. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding and to explore the clinical benefit and cost effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/epidemiology , Ischemic Attack, Transient/complications , Stroke/complications , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Prevalence , Ultrasonography
4.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 34(4): 256-61, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15086356

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A high plasma homocysteine concentration is an independent risk factor for large and possibly small vessel disease. We investigated the effects of homocysteine-lowering treatment with folic acid plus vitamin B(6) on markers of cerebrovascular atherosclerosis and cerebral microangiopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 158 healthy siblings (mean age 46.0 +/- 7.6 years) of patients with premature atherosclerotic disease, we performed a randomized, placebo-controlled trial using 5 mg of folic acid plus 250 mg of vitamin B(6) daily (n = 78) or placebo medication (n = 80). Participants were followed for 2 years with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (carotid stenosis; carotid and/or vertebral elongation) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (white matter abnormalities; cerebral atrophy). RESULTS: Seventeen (10.8%) subjects refused MRA/MRI owing to claustrophobia and were excluded. From the remaining 141 participants, 68 received vitamin and 73 received placebo medication [42 (61.8%) and 48 (65.8%) had postmethionine hyperhomocysteinaemia, respectively]. Twenty-four participants (15.2%; 10 in the treatment and 14 in the placebo group) did not complete both years of the trial. Vitamin treatment was associated with an increase in plasma folate (13-fold vs. placebo; P < 0.001) and vitamin B(6) (8.8-fold; P < 0.001). Fasting and postmethionine total homocysteine concentrations decreased 38.7% (95% CI, 27.4-50.0) and 29.1% (95% CI, 19.2-39.0) vs. placebo (all P < 0.001). During follow up six individuals in the vitamin-treated and 11 in the placebo-treated group deteriorated in their outcome measurements. Vitamin treatment, as compared with placebo, was associated with nonsignificantly improved outcomes on both MRA and MRI outcome measurements (odds ratio 0.48; 95% CI 0.17-1.41; P = 0.18 and 0.48; CI 0.14-1.60; P = 0.23, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results could indicate a possible favourable effect of homocysteine-lowering treatment on cerebrovascular atherosclerosis and cerebral microangiopathy among healthy siblings of patients with premature atherosclerotic disease, but larger trials are required to establish this with certainty.


Subject(s)
Arteriosclerosis/prevention & control , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Homocysteine/blood , Vitamin B 6/therapeutic use , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Folic Acid/blood , Hematinics/blood , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin B 6/blood
6.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 33(3): 209-15, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12641538

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyperhomocysteinaemia is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and is thought to induce its effects through causing endothelial dysfunction. We studied the effect of homocysteine-lowering treatment with folic acid plus vitamin B6 on urinary and plasma markers of endothelial function, and on plasma C-reactive protein, a marker of chronic inflammation. DESIGN: We performed a placebo-controlled 2-year trial among 158 healthy siblings of patients with premature atherosclerotic disease to determine the effect of daily folic acid (5 mg) plus vitamin B6 (250 mg) treatment as compared with placebo medication (n = 80) on markers of endothelial function (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and plasma concentrations of soluble E-selectin, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, von Willebrand factor, tissue-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) and inflammation (C-reactive protein). Outcome variables were assessed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: Fasting homocysteine concentrations ( micromol L-1) at baseline and after treatment were 14.7 +/- 8.2 and 7.4 +/- 1.9 in the vitamin and 14.7 +/- 8.8 and 12.0 +/- 5.4 for the placebo group, respectively. Vitamin treatment was associated with a decreased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio at follow up [regression coefficient (beta) -0.20 mg mmol-1 (CI: -0.43-0.03); P = 0.09]. After adjustment for age, sex, baseline concentrations of postmethionine total homocysteine plus the baseline albumin-to-creatinine ratio, the beta was -0.23 mg mmol-1 (CI: -0.43 to -0.02; P = 0.03), which amounts to a decrease of approximately 20%. There was no apparent effect of vitamin treatment on the other markers. CONCLUSIONS: Homocysteine-lowering vitamin treatment in healthy siblings of patients with premature atherosclerotic disease is associated with a decreased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, but not with other markers of endothelial dysfunction, or in plasma C-reactive protein. The clinical significance of these findings remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/urine , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Endothelium/drug effects , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Hyperhomocysteinemia/prevention & control , Vitamin B 6/therapeutic use , Adult , Arteriosclerosis/etiology , Biomarkers , Humans , Hyperhomocysteinemia/complications , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...