Correction: Prediction of Impending Type 1 Diabetes through Automated Dual-Label Measurement of Proinsulin:C-Peptide Ratio.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166702.].

Prediction of Impending Type 1 Diabetes through Automated Dual-Label Measurement of Proinsulin:C-Peptide Ratio.

BACKGROUND: The hyperglycemic clamp test, the gold standard of beta cell function, predicts impending type 1 diabetes in islet autoantibody-positive individuals, but the latter may benefit from less invasive function tests such as the proinsulin:C-peptide ratio (PI:C). The present study aims to optimize precision of PI:C measurements by automating a dual-label trefoil-type time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TT-TRFIA), and to compare its diagnostic performance for predicting type 1 diabetes with that of clamp-derived C-peptide release. METHODS: Between-day imprecision (n = 20) and split-sample analysis (n = 95) were used to compare TT-TRFIA (AutoDelfia, Perkin-Elmer) with separate methods for proinsulin (in-house TRFIA) and C-peptide (Elecsys, Roche). High-risk multiple autoantibody-positive first-degree relatives (n = 49; age 5-39) were tested for fasting PI:C, HOMA2-IR and hyperglycemic clamp and followed for 20-57 months (interquartile range). RESULTS: TT-TRFIA values for proinsulin, C-peptide and PI:C correlated significantly (r2 = 0.96-0.99; P<0.001) with results obtained with separate methods. TT-TRFIA achieved better between-day %CV for PI:C at three different levels (4.5-7.1 vs 6.7-9.5 for separate methods). In high-risk relatives fasting PI:C was significantly and inversely correlated (rs = -0.596; P<0.001) with first-phase C-peptide release during clamp (also with second phase release, only available for age 12-39 years; n = 31), but only after normalization for HOMA2-IR. In ROC- and Cox regression analysis, HOMA2-IR-corrected PI:C predicted 2-year progression to diabetes equally well as clamp-derived C-peptide release. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of PI:C benefits from the automated simultaneous determination of both hormones. HOMA2-IR-corrected PI:C may serve as a minimally invasive alternative to the more tedious hyperglycemic clamp test.

HLA-A*24 is an independent predictor of 5-year progression to diabetes in autoantibody-positive first-degree relatives of type 1 diabetic patients.

We investigated whether HLA-A*24 typing complements screening for HLA-DQ and for antibodies (Abs) against insulin, GAD, IA-2 (IA-2A), and zinc transporter-8 (ZnT8A) for prediction of rapid progression to type 1 diabetes (T1D). Persistently Ab(+) siblings/offspring (n = 288; aged 0-39 years) of T1D patients were genotyped for HLA-DQA1-DQB1 and HLA-A*24 and monitored for development of diabetes within 5 years of first Ab(+). HLA-A*24 (P = 0.009), HLA-DQ2/DQ8 (P = 0.001), and positivity for IA-2A ± ZnT8A (P < 0.001) were associated with development of T1D in multivariate analysis. The 5-year risk increased with the number of the above three markers present (n = 0: 6%; n = 1: 18%; n = 2: 46%; n = 3: 100%). Positivity for one or more markers identified a subgroup of 171 (59%) containing 88% of rapid progressors. The combined presence of HLA-A*24 and IA-2A(+) ± ZnT8A(+) defined a subgroup of 18 (6%) with an 82% diabetes risk. Among IA-2A(+) ± ZnT8A(+) relatives, identification of HLA-A*24 carriers in addition to HLA-DQ2/DQ8 carriers increased screening sensitivity for relatives at high Ab- and HLA-inferred risk (64% progression; P = 0.002). In conclusion, HLA-A*24 independently predicts rapid progression to T1D in Ab(+) relatives and complements IA-2A, ZnT8A, and HLA-DQ2/DQ8 for identifying participants in immunointervention trials.

Contribution of antibodies against IA-2ß and zinc transporter 8 to classification of diabetes diagnosed under 40 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether measuring autoantibodies against zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) and IA-2ß (IA-2ßA) may improve classification of new-onset type 1 diabetic patients based on detection of autoantibodies against insulin (IAA), GAD (GADA), and IA-2 (IA-2A). In addition, we studied the correlation of IA-2ßA and ZnT8A with other biological and demographic variables. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Circulating autoantibodies were determined by liquid-phase radiobinding assays from 761 healthy control subjects and 655 new-onset (<1 week insulin) diabetic patients (aged 0-39 years) with clinical type 1 diabetes phenotype consecutively recruited by the Belgian Diabetes Registry. RESULTS: At diagnosis, IA-2ßA and ZnT8A prevalences were 41 and 58%, respectively. In IAA-negative, GADA-negative, and IA-2A-negative patients, one IA-2ßA-positive and eleven ZnT8A-positive individuals were identified at the expense of eight and seven additional positive control subjects (1%), respectively, for each test. ZnT8A or IA-2ßA screening increased (P < 0.001; McNemar) the number of patients with ≥2 antibodies both under (from 78 to 87% for ZnT8A and 82% for IA-2ßA) and above age 15 (from 51 to 63% for ZnT8A and 56% for IA-2ßA) versus 0% in control subjects. IA-2ßA and ZnT8A were preferentially associated with IA-2A, and with younger age at diagnosis. Unlike ZnT8A, IA-2ßA levels were positively correlated with HLA-DQ8 and negatively with HLA-DQ2. ZnT8A could replace IAA for classification of patients above age 10 without loss of sensitivity or specificity. CONCLUSIONS: ZnT8A, and to a lesser degree IA-2ßA, may usefully complement GADA, IA-2A, and IAA for classifying insulin-treated diabetes under age 40 years.

Development of a multipurpose time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay for rat insulin.

We present a time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TR-FIA) for the measurement of rat insulin in cell extracts and culture media. This assay is based on the binding of two monoclonal antibodies to different parts of the insulin molecule in a 96-well microtiter plate. For the detection, europium-labeled streptavidin that interacts with the second biotinylated antibody is used. Samples of 25 microl could be analyzed in less than 2 days with a measuring range between 5 and 1250 pg (0.2-50 microg/L or 34.4-8600 pM). The inter- and intraassay percentage coefficients of variation were less than 8.3 and 5.1, respectively. Recoveries of 0.48 to 40 microg/L rat insulin, added to culture medium, ranged between 94 and 107%. Results were significantly correlated with those of an in-house radioimmunoassay (RIA) for rodent insulin (P<0.0001, r(2)=0.99). The TR-FIA method had a similar detection limit (0.16 microg/L), but its working range was at least 5-fold larger. Additional advantages include the lower cost, the applicability to measurements in tissue and serum, and the quantification of insulin from other species.

Simultaneous measurement of plasma concentrations of proinsulin and C-peptide and their ratio with a trefoil-type time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: When the concentrations of 2 or more substances are measured separately, their molar ratios are subject to the additive imprecisions of the different assays. We hypothesized that the cumulative error for concentration ratios of peptides containing a common sequence might be minimized by measuring the peptides simultaneously with a "trefoil-type" immunoassay. METHODS: As a model of this approach, we developed a dual-label time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) to simultaneously measure proinsulin, C-peptide, and the proinsulin-C-peptide ratio (PI/C). A monoclonal antibody captures all C-peptide-containing molecules, and 2 differently labeled antibodies distinguish between proinsulin-like molecules and true C-peptide. RESULTS: The trefoil-type TRFIA was capable of measuring plasma C-peptide and proinsulin simultaneously without mutual interference at limits of quantification of 48 and 8125 pmol/L, and 2.1 and 197 pmol/L, respectively. Within-laboratory imprecision values for the trefoil-type TRFIA ranged between 8.4% and 12% for the hormone concentrations. Unlike the hormone results obtained with separate assays, imprecision did not increase when PI/C was calculated from trefoil assay results (P < 0.05). Peptide concentrations were highly correlated with results obtained in individual comparison assays (r(2) > or = 0.965; P < 0.0001). The total error for PI/C obtained with the trefoil-type TRFIA remained < or = 25% over a broader C-peptide range than with separate hormone assays (79-7200 pmol/L vs 590-4300 pmol/L C-peptide). Preliminary data indicate little or no interference by heterophile antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The developed trefoil-type TRFIA is a reliable method for simultaneous measurement of proinsulin, C-peptide, and PI/C and provides proof of principle for the development of other trefoil-type multiple-label immunoassays.