Reasons for Conversion and Adverse Intraoperative Events in Robotically Enhanced Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The transition from sternotomy access to minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with steep learning curves. This study reports the reasons for sternotomy conversions from robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (RE-MIDCAB) and describes potential risk reduction strategies. METHODS: The perioperative data of 759 RE-MIDCAB patients (mean age 65.9 ± 10 years, 25.5% female, 30.2% multivessel disease) operated between July 1, 2002 and November 30, 2018 were reviewed for the reasons of conversion and adverse intraoperative events. Hybrid revascularization was planned in 204 (26.9%) patients. RESULTS: Sternotomy conversion occurred in 30 (4.0%) patients. Lung adhesions and unsuccessful single-lung ventilation prohibited safe RE-MIDCAB internal thoracic artery (ITA) harvesting in 11 (36.7%) and 1 (3.3%) patients, respectively. ITA dysfunction (n = 11, 36.7%) and inadequate target vessel visualization (n = 3, 10.0%) were among the anatomical reasons for conversions. Adverse intraoperative events included ventricle perforation (n = 1, 3.3%) and sustained ventricular arrhythmia (n = 1, 3.3%). The in-hospital mortality and mean length of hospitalization for sternotomy conversion were 3.3% (n = 1 of 30) and 13.4 ± 14.5 days, respectively. Perioperative morbidities included pneumonia (n = 4, 13.3%). Premorbid renal dysfunction predicted sternotomy conversion at the 5% level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: RE-MIDCAB provides an attractive surgical platform for primary- or hybrid coronary artery procedures. The progressive increase in patient risk profiles, strict quality control, and focus on clinical governance require awareness of reasons that potentially contribute RE-MIDCAB to sternotomy conversion to ensure safe and sustainable programs.

Endoscopic port access surgery for isolated atrioventricular valve endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to report the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of endoscopic port access surgery for isolated active and convalescent atrioventricular valve endocarditis (AVVE). METHODS: Our current surgical team performed endoscopic port access surgery in 66 consecutive patients with isolated AVVE (mean age, 65.5 ± 12.7 years, 37.9% women, mean EuroSCORE II 31.2 ± 24.9%, 45.5% prosthetic AVVE, Staphylococcus aureus 22.2%), between 1 May 2004 and 31 July 2015. Isolated mitral valve endocarditis was present in 53 (80.4%) patients, including 11 (16.7%) with periannular abscesses. RESULTS: Procedures performed included mitral valve repair (n = 15, 22.7%) and left ventricular septal myomectomy (n = 1, 1.5%). Reasons for sternotomy conversion (n = 6, 9.1%) included lung adhesions (n = 3, 4.5%). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and ischaemic times were 167.2 ±48.7 and 112.6 ± 33.3 min, respectively. In-hospital morbidities included revision for bleeding (n = 6, 9.1%). The 30-day survival rate was 87.9%. Causes of in-hospital deaths (n = 12) included low cardiac output syndrome (n = 3, 4.5%). Age, critical preoperative status and EuroSCORE II score predicted deaths individually at the 5% level of significance. The Kaplan-Meier analyses (mean 63.2 ± 42.5 months) for survival and freedom from AVVE reintervention at 10 years were 69.4% and 98.4%, respectively. Of the mid-term survivors (n = 50, 93.9% complete), 94.0% (n = 47) classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) II or less with no mitral valve regurgitation greater than Grade I. CONCLUSIONS: Complex atrioventricular valve surgery in the context of AVVE can be endoscopically performed in experienced centres and should not deter surgeons from offering patients with AVVE the potential benefits of minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Reasons for conversion and adverse intraoperative events in Endoscopic Port Access™ atrioventricular valve surgery and minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the factors that contribute to sternotomy conversions (SCs) and adverse intraoperative events in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (MI-AVS) and minimally invasive Endoscopic Port Access™ atrioventricular valve surgery (MI-PAS). METHODS: In total, 3780 consecutive patients with either aortic valve disease or atrioventricular valve disease underwent minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) at our institution between 1 February 1997 and 31 March 2016. MI-AVS was performed in 908 patients (mean age 69.2 ± 11.3 years, 45.2% women, 6.2% redo cardiac surgery) and MI-PAS in 2872 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 13.3 years, 46.7% women, 12.2% redo cardiac surgery). RESULTS: A cumulative total of 4415 MIVS procedures (MI-AVS = 908, MI-PAS = 3507) included 1537 valve replacements (MI-AVS = 896, MI-PAS = 641) and 2878 isolated or combined valve repairs (MI-AVS = 12, MI-PAS = 2866). SC was required in 3.0% (n = 114 of 3780) of MIVS patients, which occurred in 3.1% (n = 28 of 908) of MI-AVS patients and 3.0% (n = 86 of 2872) of MI-PAS patients, respectively. Reasons for SC in MI-AVS included inadequate visualization (n = 4, 0.4%) and arterial cannulation difficulty (n = 7, 0.8%). For MI-PAS, SC was required in 54 (2.5%) isolated mitral valve procedures (n = 2183). Factors that contributed to SC in MI-PAS included lung adhesions (n = 35, 1.2%), inadequate visualization (n = 2, 0.1%), ventricular bleeding (n = 3, 0.1%) and atrioventricular dehiscence (n = 5, 0.2%). Neurological deficit occurred in 1 (0.1%) and 3 (3.5%) MI-AVS and MI-PAS conversions, respectively. No operative or 30-day mortalities were observed in MI-AVS conversions (n = 28). The 30-day mortality associated with SC in MI-PAS (n = 86) was 10.5% (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: MIVS is increasingly being recognized as the 'gold-standard' for surgical valve interventions in the context of rapidly expanding catheter-based technology and increasing patient expectations. Surgeons need to be aware of factors that contribute to SC and adverse intraoperative outcomes to ensure that patients enjoy the maximum potential benefit of MIVS and to apply effective risk reduction strategies that encourage safer and sustainable MIVS programmes.

Endoscopic Port Access Surgery for Late Orthotopic Cardiac Transplantation Atrioventricular Valve Disease.

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to present details of the perioperative and long-term outcomes of redo-endoscopic port access surgery (REPAS) for late atrioventricular valve disease (AVVD) in orthotopic cardiac transplant (OCT) patients. METHODS: Between February 2004 and October 2015, REPAS was performed for late AVVD in seven consecutive OCT patients (mean age 57.9 ± 17.2 years; EuroSCORE II 21.2 ± 14.7%) at the authors' institution. The mean OCT-REPAS time interval was 7.8 ± 4.6 years (range: 1.3-13.8 years). NYHA class III or IV symptoms were present in four patients (57%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52.9 ± 3.9%, and surgical indications included severe mitral valve (MV) and tricuspid valve (TV) regurgitation in three patients (44%) and six patients (86%), respectively. Etiological factors included endomyocardial biopsy trauma (n = 6; 86%), degenerative disease (n = 2; 29%), and fungal endocarditis (n = 1; 14%). RESULTS: Procedures performed included MV repair (n = 3; 43%) and TV replacement (n = 3; 43%). There were no sternotomy conversions or revisions for any cause. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemic times were 178.4 ± 48.6 min and 118.3 ± 39.5 min, respectively. In-hospital morbidities included hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 2; 29%). There were no wound infections or 30-day mortalities. The mean duration of hospitalization was 18.3 ± 11.0 days. A mean of 29.2 ± 45.6 patient-months (total 204.3 patient-months) was available for long-term clinical and echocardiographic analysis (n = 7; 100% complete). No MV or TV reinterventions were required. NYHA class ≤II was achieved in five patients (71%). No patient presented with residual MV regurgitation greater than grade I. CONCLUSIONS: REPAS for late AVVD in OCT patients is a safe and durable procedure with favorable technique-related mortality, in-hospital morbidity, and long-term cardiac-specific outcomes at experienced centers. The present technique provided an attractive benchmark against which emerging percutaneous interventions may be measured, and earlier referral of patients should be considered.

Endoscopic atrioventricular valve surgery in adults with difficult-to-access uncorrected congenital chest wall deformities.

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the first report on in-hospital and long-term outcomes of endoscopic port access atrioventricular valve surgery (EPAAVVS) in adult patients with uncorrected congenital chest wall deformities (CCWDs). METHODS: Our current surgical team performed EPAAVVS in 7 consecutive adult patients (mean age 51.3 ± 16.4 years, 14.3% female, 50% older than 60 years, mean EuroSCORE II 0.8 ± 0.1%) with uncorrected CCWDs between 1 November 2009 and 30 November 2015. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 66.0 ± 8.5%. Surgical indications included isolated or combined symptomatic mitral valve (MV) regurgitation (n = 7, 100%), left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction (n = 1, 14.3%) and patent foramen ovale (n = 3, 42.9%). Fibro-elastic deficiency accounted for 57.1% of MV pathology and 5 patients (74.1%) presented with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III symptoms. CCWDs included isolated pectus excavatum (n = 5, 71.4%) and mixed pectus excavatum and carinatum (n = 2, 28.6%). The mean Haller-index and correction index scores were 2.7 ± 0.5 and 21.4 ± 10.2%, respectively. RESULTS: Procedures performed included MV repair (n = 7, 100%), tricuspid valve (TV) repair (n = 1, 14.3%) and left ventricular septal myomectomy (n = 1, 14.3%). There were no sternotomy conversions or complications with chest wall entry or atrioventricular valve exposure. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 162.1 ± 48.1 and 113.7 ± 33.5 min, respectively. No patient required mechanical ventilation or intensive care treatment longer than 24 h. There were no surgical revisions, in-hospital respiratory or chest wall morbidities. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.4 ± 1.0 days. A total of 208 patient-months (mean 29.7 ± 26.5) were available for long-term clinical and echocardiographic analysis. There were no 30-day or long-term mortalities and no patient required reintervention for residual atrioventricular valve pathology. All patients were classified as NYHA I during recent consultations, and echocardiographic follow-up confirmed no residual MV regurgitation greater than Grade 1 in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: EPAAVVS in adults with uncorrected CCWD is safe, feasible and durable and can successfully be performed by experienced teams to achieve Haller index and correction index scores of up to 3.3 and 38.3%, respectively, with favourable long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. The mere presence of uncorrected CCWDs should not deter surgeons from offering these patients the full benefits of minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Late redo-port access surgery after port access surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the first report on short- and long-term outcomes in redo-port access surgery after previous port access surgery (redo-PAS-PAS) for new or recurrent mitral valve (MV) and tricuspid valve (TV) disease. METHODS: Our current surgical team performed redo-PAS-PAS in 26 consecutive patients who had previous port access surgery (mean age 65.8 ± 13.3 years, 46.2% female, 42.3% older than 70 years, mean logistical EuroSCORE 22.5 ± 21.6%) between 1 February 1997 and 30 June 2014. Surgical indications included among others MV prosthesis dysfunction (n = 8, 30.8%), endocarditis (n = 10, 38.5%) and TV dysfunction (n = 3, 11.5%). The mean time interval between primary PAS and redo-PAS-PAS was 70.32 ± 57.4 months. RESULTS: Redo-PAS-PAS procedures included MV replacement (n = 19, 73.1%), MV repair (n = 5, 19.2%), and TV repair (n = 2, 7.7%). Sternotomy conversion was required in 5 patients (19.2%), of which 4 (15.4%) were early conversions due to lung adhesion and 1 (3.8%) due to a late intraoperative complication. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 163.3 ± 57.9 and 101.2 ± 43.8 min, respectively. Postoperative mechanical ventilation longer than 72 h was required in 4 patients (15.4%). In-hospital morbidities included hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 3, 11.5%), postoperative air leaks (n = 2, 7.7%) and revision for bleeding (n = 1, 3.8%). The mean length of hospital stay was 16.1 days. Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were 48.3 ± 39.2 and 44.6 ± 32.9 months, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analyses for survival and freedom from mitral and tricuspid valve reintervention (n = 26) at 5 years were 83.9 and 95.8%, respectively, with 91.3% of surviving patients classified as being NYHA II or less. Echocardiographic follow-up showed no residual mitral regurgitation more than grade I in all redo mitral valve repairs and no paravalvular leak post-valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Redo-PAS-PAS is our routine approach and we apply this strategy in the majority of patients who had previous port access surgery. The predicted procedure-related mortality, morbidities, patient satisfaction and long-term outcomes are favourable.

Minimally invasive primary aortic valve surgery: the OLV Aalst experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our in-hospital outcomes with primary J-sternotomy aortic valve surgery since the initiation of our program in 1997. METHODS: Between October 1(st) 1997 and August 31(st) 2014, 768 patients (mean age: 69.1±11.2 years, 46.6% females, 15.6% aged greater than 80 years) underwent primary JS-AVS. Additional risk factors included diabetes mellitus (n=98, 12.2%), peripheral vascular disease (n=42, 5.5%) and body mass index greater than 30 (n=144, 18.8%). The mean logistical EuroSCORE I was 5.46%±4.5%. RESULTS: Aortic valve replacement and repair were performed in 758 (98.7%) and 10 (1.3%) patients respectively, for isolated valve stenosis (n=472, 61.8%), incompetence (n=56, 7.3%) and mixed valve disease (n=236, 30.9%). Valve pathology included sclerosis (n=516, 67.2%), rheumatic disease (n=110, 14.3%) and endocarditis (n=10, 1.3%). Reasons for conversion to full sternotomy (n=23, 3.0%) included porcelain ascending aorta (n=3, 0.4%), inadequate visualization (n=2, 0.3%) and intra-operative complications (n=18, 2.3%). Mean length of hospital stay was 11.0±7.4 days. Morbidity included stroke (n=15, 2.0%), revision or re-exploration (n=52, 6.8%), atrial fibrillation (n=201, 26.2%) and sternitis (n=5, 0.7%). In-hospital mortality was 1.6% (n=12). Overall survival at 30 days was 98.0%. CONCLUSIONS: JS-AVS is safe and is our routine approach for isolated aortic valve disease. Procedure related mortality is lower than predicted, conversion rates limited and significant morbidity minimal.

Does a minimally invasive approach increase the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement?

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The impact of a minimally invasive approach on patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains unknown. The study aim was to identify the impact of a minimally invasive approach for AVR on the incidence of PPM. METHODS: The results of a single-center experience in 506 patients who underwent isolated AVR through a minimally invasive or conventional sternotomy were analyzed. Postoperative PPM was defined as an effective orifice area index < 0.85 cm2/m2, and was correlated with surgical approach, mortality and cardiac events after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, postoperative PPM was present in 26.0% of the patients. The ratio of PPM was 24.1% in minimal access patients and 27.7% in conventional AVR patients (p = 0.35). Hospital mortality was similar in both groups (3.8% versus 3.4%, p = 0.62). The body mass index (BMI) was higher in patients with PPM (28.5 +/- 4.4 versus 25.3 +/- 3.6 kg/m2; p = 0.0001), but obesity was significantly associated with PPM (36.3% versus 9.4%; p = 0.0001). The PPM group included more patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 0.50 (12.8% versus 5.3%; p = 0.004). The independent risk factors for PPM were increased BMI (p = 0.0001), LVEF < 0.50 (p = 0.007) and preoperative aortic stenosis (p = 0.029). A LVEF < 0.50 increased the risk for PPM by 3.77-fold (95% CI: 1.4-9.9), while a high BMI increased the risk by 1.42-fold (95% CI: 1.3-1.5). Preoperative aortic insufficiency was associated with PPM, but did not significantly increase the risk. CONCLUSION: A minimally invasive approach for AVR did not lead to an increased incidence of PPM and associated adverse events following surgery.

Endoscopic mitral and tricuspid valve surgery after previous cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a right video-assisted approach for atrioventricular valve disease after previous cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between December 1st 1997 and May 1st 2006, 80 adults (mean age 65+/-12 years; 56% female) underwent reoperative surgery using a video-assisted approach without rib spreading. Previous cardiac operations included mitral valve (39%), CABG (29%), congenital (10%), and other (23%). For 25% of patients, this was at least their third cardiac operation. Mean time to redo surgery was 15+/-12 years. Femoral vessel cannulation and endoaortic clamping were routinely used. Mean preoperative Euroscore was 9.0+/-2.7 (5 to 20) and predicted mortality was 16.0+/-14.2% (4 to 86). Median preoperative NYHA class was II and mean follow-up was 25+/-22 months. Lung adhesions necessitated sternotomy in 4 cases and cannulation problems in another patient. Total operative mortality was 3.8% (n=3), O/E for mortality being 0.24. Procedures were mitral valve repair (45%; n=36), replacement (50%; n=40) and tricuspid valve replacement (5%; n=4). Additional procedures were performed in 44% (n=35). Mean aortic crossclamp and procedure time were 92+/-37 and 267+/-64 minutes. Mean postoperative blood loss was 815+/-1083 mL. Postoperative morbidity included 2 strokes (2.5%). Mean hospital stay was 10.7+/-6.7 days. Survival at 1 and 4 years was 93.6+/-2.8% and 85.6+/-6.4%. There was 1 late reoperation at 5 years. Median NYHA class at follow-up was II. When comparing, all but 1 patient (98.8%) preferred their minimally invasive approach when considering perioperative pain, postoperative rehabilitation, and final esthetic result. CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted minimal access correction of atrioventricular valve disease after previous cardiac surgery is not only feasible but had lower than predicted mortality and strong patient satisfaction. It should therefore be used more frequently in today's practice.

Endoscopic cardiac tumor resection.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to report our 9 years' experience with endoscopic cardiac tumor resection using the port access approach. METHODS: From March 1997 to December 2005, 27 patients (mean age, 56.2 +/- 16.9 years; 70% female) underwent endoscopic cardiac tumor resection using endocardiopulmonary bypass and endoaortic-balloon clamp technique. Nineteen (70%) patients presented in New York Heart Association class I, 4 patients presented with embolic stroke, and 4 patients presented with atrial arrhythmias. All patients underwent echocardiography on admission, intraoperatively, at discharge, and at follow-up evaluation. Eight patients additionally required mitral valve replacement (n = 1), tricuspid valve replacement (n = 1), mitral valve repair (n = 2), mini-maze (n = 1), and closure of patent foramen ovale (n = 3). Mean follow-up was 3.4 +/- 2.7 years. RESULTS: Mean endoaortic-balloon clamp and endocardiopulmonary bypass times were 68.8 +/- 30.8 minutes and 112.2 +/- 41.5 minutes, respectively. There were no conversions to sternotomy. Tumors resected were classified as left atrial myxoma (n = 20), right atrial myxoma (n = 3), lipoma (n = 1), intravenous leiomyoma involving the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid valve (n = 1), plexiform tumor of the sinoatrial node (n = 1), and papillary fibroelastoma of aortic valve noncoronary cusp (n = 1). There were no hospital deaths. Mean intensive care unit and hospital stays were 1.4 +/- 1.1 days and 7.3 +/- 3.4 days, respectively. Postoperative complications were evolving stroke (n = 1), re-exploration for bleeding (n = 1), and myocardial ischemia requiring stenting (n = 1). Follow-up failed to demonstrate residual or recurrent tumor. One patient had a small residual atrial septal defect. Ninety-two percent of patients appreciated the cosmetic result and fast recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cardiac tumor resection is feasible and a valid oncologic approach with an attractive cosmetic advantage over median sternotomy.

Avoiding vascular complications during minimally invasive, totally endoscopic intracardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of minimally invasive valve surgery has been associated with an increased use of peripheral vessel cannulation in cardiopulmonary bypass. These techniques are associated with potential problems at the aorta or cannulation sites. The goal of this study was to review and describe our current practice to avoid vascular problems during cannulation of peripheral vessels. METHOD: Data collection for this study was done retrospectively by reviewing the files of all patients who underwent a minimally invasive mitral and/or tricuspid surgery in our institution from 1997 to the end of 2005. RESULTS: Our cohort of 978 patients revealed an overall rate of peripheral vascular complication of 1.0% with 44.4% presenting at the time of the surgery and 63.6% at long-term follow-up. Acute peripheral vascular problems were treated by simple graft replacement of the diseased segment in most cases. All aortic complications happened at the time of the surgery (complication rate of 0.9%) with 60% of them associated with cannulation problems. Most patients were treated by replacement of the ascending aorta. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic and careful approach is associated with a low risk of vascular problems. Prevention and planning with precise surgical technique remain the main conditions to safely use peripheral cannulation and perfusion for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Current strategies in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: review of the literature and Onze Lieve Vrouw Clinic's strategy.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common rhythm disturbance in clinical practice. It is a major source of stroke and morbidity. Although the Cox maze procedure effectively eliminates atrial fibrillation in most patients, the procedure has not found widespread application. As a consequence, new operations that use alternative sources of energy, such as radiofrequency, microwave, cryothermy, laser, and ultrasound have emerged to surgically create lesion sets to treat atrial fibrillation. This article reviews the fundamentals and current strategies in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Modified maze during endoscopic mitral valve surgery: the OLV Clinic experience.

BACKGROUND: The use of radiofrequency ablation to perform the mini-maze procedure (pulmonary veins isolation) has been reported with good results. The aim of this study was to evaluate our practice with the association of the mini-maze procedure, done with the use of the Cardioblade pen, and minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. METHODS: From January 1999 to November 2004, 103 patients underwent a minimally invasive mitral valve surgery with a concomitant pulmonary veins isolation (modified maze procedure) done with unipolar radiofrequency. All files were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: In our group of patients, 41.2% were known to have intermittent atrial fibrillation and 58.8%, continuous atrial fibrillation; 67.7% of the patients were in atrial fibrillation at the time of surgery. Precise time of duration of atrial fibrillation was known in 47.6% (mean time, 30.3 +/- 28.9 months), but 47.7% were also known to have atrial fibrillation for many years. Mitral surgery included mitral valve repair in 71.8% and mitral valve replacement in 26.2%; 22 patients also received tricuspid annuloplasty. Major complications were mortality in 1%, myocardial infarction in 1%, stroke or transient ischemic attack in 1.9% and permanent pacemaker placement in 5.9%. At the time of discharge, 71.9% of patients were in sinus rhythm, 21.9% in atrial fibrillation, 1% in atrial flutter, and 5.2% in paced rhythm. Seventy-six and a half percent of the patients left the hospital with an antiarrhythmic drug (amiodarone 56.9%, sotalol 15.7%). At the time of follow-up, 99 patients were still alive with a mean follow-up time of 17.4 +/- 14.1 months; 69.7% of patients were in sinus rhythm, 28.3% in atrial fibrillation, and 2% were pacemaker-dependent. Patients received antiarrhythmic medication in 81.2% of cases (amiodarone 46.4%, sotalol 17.9%, beta-blocker 39.3%, digoxine 7.1%). Eleven new pacemakers were implanted (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of unipolar radiofrequency ablation to perform a mini-maze during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a safe procedure and is associated with good early results.

Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through partial upper sternotomy has been shown to reduce surgical trauma, and, supposedly, decrease postoperative pain, blood loss, and hospital stay. METHODS: From October 1997 until November 2004, 506 patients received isolated aortic valve replacement, of which 232 underwent the minimal access J-sternotomy approach (group 1). The control group (group 2) consisted of 274 patients who underwent aortic valve replacements by median sternotomy. We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of the patients in the early follow-up period. RESULTS: In group 1 and group 2, respectively, early mortality was 2.6% (6 patients) and 4.4% (12 patients). The minimal access group had reduced aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times compared with conventional group: 61.8 +/- 16.6 versus 69.5 +/- 16.6 minutes (p < 0.05) and 88.8 +/- 23.2 versus 100.2 +/- 22.6 minutes (p < 0.05), respectively. Mean blood loss was lower in group 1 compared with group 2 (p < 0.05). Intensive care unit and hospital stays were shorter in the minimal access group: 2.1 +/- 2.5 versus 2.5 +/- 5.3 days (p = nonsignificant) and 10.8 +/- 7.1 versus 12.8 +/- 10.6 days (p < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement can be performed safely through a partial upper sternotomy on a routine basis for isolated aortic valve disease.

Initial experience with robotic epicardial off-pump pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: : To evaluate the feasibility and results of isolated endoscopic pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using robotics. METHODS: : Between November 2004 and December 2005, 13 patients (38.5% female) underwent robotic pulmonary vein isolation at our institution. Mean age was 46.8 ± 8.4 years and mean preoperative duration of atrial fibrillation was 52.7 ± 31.5 months. Indication for surgery was symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or recurrence after percutaneous treatment (n = 3). Mean preoperative left atrial dimension was 38.5 ± 6.9 mm. The surgical procedure was performed off-pump as an isolated right chest approach. All procedures were performed using the Flex 10 microwave ablator (Guidant, Indianapolis, IN), which was positioned from the right side through the transverse sinus and around the 4 pulmonary veins. Postoperative drug regimen included sotalol and Coumadin. Mean follow-up was 8.5 ± 3.4 months. RESULTS: : The procedure was successful in 11 patients. One patient needed conversion to median sternotomy for right pulmonary artery bleeding and a second patient had severe transverse sinus adhesions requiring conversion to a bilateral video-assisted small thoracotomy approach. No other morbidity occurred. Mean procedure time in successful cases was 2.7 ± 0.8 hours (range 1.7 to 4 hours). Permanent sinus rhythm was successfully restored in 10 of 13 patients (76.9% beyond 6 months). Nonsuccessful patients had markedly reduced symptoms and frequency of events. One patient required a left and another a right atrial flutter ablation during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: : Robotic pulmonary vein isolation is a feasible procedure that has the potential to become a valid option in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Initial experience with an endoscopic radial artery harvesting technique.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the feasibility of an endoscopic radial artery harvesting technique to improve esthetic results and possibly reduce the incidence of neurologic complications observed with the open method. METHODS: Between July 1, 2002, and October 1, 2003, a total of 54 patients underwent endoscopic radial artery harvesting at our institution. Standard endoscopic equipment and a Harmonic Scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio) were used. Mean age of the patients was 63 +/- 8.1 years, and 16% were female. All patients underwent a preoperative Allen test and duplex ultrasonography to demonstrate adequate ulnar collateral flow. The nondominant arm was used for radial artery harvesting. Mean clinical follow-up was 13 +/- 4.6 months. RESULTS: The artery was harvested through a 3-cm incision at the wrist and was divided at the elbow either through a small counterincision (n = 16) or endoscopically with the use of clips, Endoloop, and endoscopic scissors (n = 38). Mean harvest time was 42.2 +/- 16.9 minutes but decreased from 85 minutes for the first cases to 25 minutes for the last 5 cases. Mean harvested length was 19.6 +/- 1.7 cm. Harvesting complications included 1 conversion, 2 postoperative hematomas, 1 injury, 8 endoscopically controlled bleedings, and 15 cases of at least some superficial radial nerve paresthesia at 6 weeks (clinically relevant in 4 cases). Selective postoperative angiography revealed 1 occluded graft and 1 stenotic graft requiring percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the native vessel. Eighty-seven percent of the patients were enthusiastic about this new procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is a feasible procedure that requires a definite learning curve. Although nerve paresthesias were not completely eliminated in our experience, the technique provided ample patient satisfaction. Further clinical follow-up is required to determine long-term patency rates.

Mitral valve surgery can now routinely be performed endoscopically.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Since February 1, 1997 till April 1, 2002, 306 patients underwent endoscopic mitral valve surgery (226 repair, MVP; 80 replacement, MVR). Predominant valve pathology was degenerative in MVP (83.6%) and rheumatic in MVR (65%). Mean age was 61.5+/-12.9 years. Median preoperative functional class (MVP+MVR) and mitral regurgitation (MVP) were II and 4+. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Mean follow-up was 19.6+/-17.3 months and complete. The procedure was successfully performed in all but 6 patients. Hospital mortality included 3 patients (1%) and was technology related in one. Postoperative morbidity included aggressive re-exploration (8.5%), new onset atrial fibrillation (17.0%), and pacemaker implantation (2.3%). There were 1 early and 10 late reoperations, 5 of which were because of endocarditis. Freedom from mitral valve reoperation at 4 years was 91+/-3.5%. No risk factors for reoperation could be detected. Echocardiographic follow-up showed a median degree of mitral regurgitation (MVP) of 0 and a small paravalvular leak in four patients (MVR). Ninety-four percent of the patients reported no or mild postoperative pain and 99.3% felt they had an esthetically pleasing scar. Ninety-three percent would choose the same procedure again and 46.1% were back at work within 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mitral valve surgery can be performed safely but definitely requires a learning curve. Good results and a high patient satisfaction are guaranteed. It is now our exclusive approach for isolated atrioventricular valve disease.

Endoscopic mitral valve repair: feasible, reproducible, and durable.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to document the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of performing mitral valve repair using a totally endoscopic approach. METHODS: Between February 1997 and October 1, 2001, 187 patients underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve repair at our institution. The mean age was 60.7 +/- 13.1 years, and 62% were male. Median preoperative functional class and degree of mitral regurgitation were II and 4, respectively. Data collection included an institutional protocol assessing procedure-related pain, cosmesis, and functional recovery. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Mean follow-up was 19 +/- 15.2 months and was 100% complete. RESULTS: Associated atrial procedures were performed in 9.1% (n = 17) of the patients. Two patients required intraoperative conversion to sternotomy. Thoracoscopic re-evaluation for suspected bleeding (n = 19) was part of our aggressive postoperative management. One patient required sternotomy for control of bleeding. Hospital mortality included 1 (0.5%) patient and was not technology related. There were 1 early and 6 late reoperations, 4 of which were due to endocarditis. No risk factors for repair failure could be detected. Freedom from mitral valve reoperation at 4 years was 93.3% +/- 2.6%. The median degree of mitral regurgitation at follow-up was 0. Ninety-three percent of the patients were highly satisfied with either no or mild postoperative pain, and 98.4% believed they had an aesthetically pleasing scar. CONCLUSIONS: Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair can be done safely with excellent results and a high degree of patient satisfaction. It is now our exclusive approach for isolated atrioventricular valve disease.

From classical sternotomy to truly endoscopic mitral valve surgery: a step by step procedure.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing tendency towards minimally invasive valve surgery and various surgical techniques have been proposed to realise this goal. The aim of the present study was to describe our current surgical technique and clinical experience with respect to an endoscopic technique that allows the surgeon to perform an operation through a series of small intercostal ports. METHODS: After a learning experience with thoracoscopic left internal mammary to left anterior descending coronary artery bypass surgery, we adopted the endocardiopulmonary bypass technique to perform mitral valve surgery. The technique requires exclusive use of video-assisted surgery and control by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Surgery requires long instruments and extra-corporeal knot tying. Between February 1997 and November 2001, 259 patients were operated on. Mitral valve repair was performed in 190 of them. One patient had a redo procedure using this approach to correct a paravalvular leak, but all other procedures were primary interventions. RESULTS: In all patients, surgery was performed using a 2 inch working port and two additional half-inch trocar-ports. Five patients required a conversion to median sternotomy: three because of inadequate size of the femoral vessels and two because of intraoperative aortic dissection. Hospital mortality included two patients, and seven patients required late reoperation (four of these were as a result of endocarditis). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mitral valve surgery is demanding, but feasible. Once the appropriate skills are acquired, both patient and surgeon can enjoy the benefits of this exciting new technique.