Predicting Survival After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for ARDS: An External Validation of RESP and PRESERVE Scores.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to test the performance of PRESERVE and RESP scores to predict death in patients with severe ARDS receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with different case mixes. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with ECMO for refractory ARDS, regardless of cause, in the Caen University Hospital in northwestern France over the last decade were included in a retrospective cohort study. The receiver operating characteristic curves of each score were plotted, and the area under the curve was computed to assess their performance in predicting mortality (c-index). RESULTS: Forty-one subjects were included. Pre-ECMO ventilator settings were: mean VT, 6.1 ± 0.9 mL/kg; breathing frequency, 32 ± 4 breaths/min; PEEP, 11 ± 4 cm H2O; peak inspiratory pressure, 48 ± 9 cm H2O; plateau pressure, 30.4 ± 4.4 cm H2O. At ECMO initiation, blood gas results were: pH 7.22 ± 0.17, PaO2 /FIO2 = 63 ± 22 mm Hg; PaCO2 = 56 ± 18 mm Hg; FIO2 = 99 ± 2%. Pre-ECMO data were available in 35 and 27 subjects for calculation of the PRESERVE score and RESP score, respectively. Pre-ECMO scoring system results were: median PRESERVE score, 4 (interquartile range 2-5), and median RESP score, 0 (interquartile range -2 to 2). Twenty-three subjects (56%) died, including 19 receiving ECMO. In univariate analysis, plateau pressure (P = .031), driving pressure (P = <.001), and compliance (P = .02) recorded at the time of ECMO initiation as well as the PRESERVE score (P = .032) were significantly associated with mortality. With a c-index of 0.69 (95% CI 0.53-0.87), the PRESERVE score had better discrimination than the RESP score (c-index of 0.60 [95% CI 0.41-0.78]) for predicting mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The use of these scores in helping physicians to determine the patients with ARDS most likely to benefit from ECMO should be limited in clinical practice because of their relatively poor performance in predicting death in subjects with severe ARDS receiving ECMO support. Before widespread use is initiated, these scoring systems should be tested in large prospective studies of subjects with severe ARDS undergoing ECMO treatment.

Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Sodium Chloride for Preventing Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To test whether hydration with bicarbonate rather than isotonic sodium chloride reduces the risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled study. SETTING: Three French ICUs. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients with stable renal function (n = 307) who received intravascular contrast media. INTERVENTIONS: Hydration with 0.9% sodium chloride or 1.4% sodium bicarbonate administered with the same infusion protocol: 3 mL/kg during 1 hour before and 1 mL/kg/hr during 6 hours after contrast medium exposure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the development of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria, 72 hours after contrast exposure. Patients randomized to the bicarbonate group (n = 151) showed a higher urinary pH at the end of the infusion than patients randomized to the saline group (n = 156) (6.7 ± 2.1 vs 6.2 ± 1.8, respectively; p < 0.0001). The frequency of contrast-associated acute kidney injury was similar in both groups: 52 patients (33.3%) in the saline group and 53 patients (35.1%) in the bicarbonate group (absolute risk difference, -1.8%; 95% CI [-12.3% to 8.9%]; p = 0.81). The need for renal replacement therapy (five [3.2%] and six [3.9%] patients; p = 0.77), ICU length of stay (24.7 ± 22.9 and 23 ± 23.8 d; p = 0.52), and mortality (25 [16.0%] and 24 [15.9%] patients; p > 0.99) were also similar between the saline and bicarbonate groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Except for urinary pH, none of the outcomes differed between the two groups. Among ICU patients with stable renal function, the benefit of using sodium bicarbonate rather than isotonic sodium chloride for preventing contrast-associated acute kidney injury is marginal, if any.

Are psychiatric disorders associated with worse asthma control and quality of life in asthma patients?

BACKGROUND: Achieving good asthma control has become the major goal of asthma treatment. Studies have reported a high rate of psychiatric disorders among asthma patients, though the impact of these disorders on asthma control and quality of life remains unexplored. This study evaluated the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 406 adult asthma patients, and associations between psychiatric status, levels of asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life. METHODS: Consecutive asthma patients presenting to the asthma clinic underwent a brief, structured psychiatric interview, completed the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and reported the frequency of bronchodilator use in the past week. All patients underwent standard pulmonary function testing. RESULTS: A total of 34% (n=136) of patients had one or more psychiatric diagnosis, including major depression (15%), minor depression (5%), dysthymia (4%), panic disorder (12%), generalized anxiety disorder (5%), and social phobia (4%). Though there were no differences in pulmonary function, patients with versus without psychiatric disorders had worse ACQ and AQLQ scores and reported greater bronchodilator use, independent age, sex and asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that psychiatric disorders are prevalent among asthmatics and are associated with worse asthma control and quality of life. Physicians should be aware of the potential risk of poorer asthma control and functional impairment in this population.

[Impact of lack of resources in dialysis practice in Quebec]. / L'impact de la rareté des ressources sur la pratique de la dialyse au Québec.

The purpose of this descriptive study was to assess the impact of limited resources on the practice of dialysis in Quebec and to highlight certain ethical issues. Twelve semi-structured interviews were done with nurses in charge of 14 dialysis centres in Quebec. A survey using self-administered questionnaires was also carried out between January 2000 and July 2001, with a convenience sample of 412 patients and 156 other persons involved, including 116 dialysis nurses. Two discussion groups brought together sixteen stakeholders from four dialysis centres. The results presented here were obtained by triangulating methods and data. They show that access to dialysis is not limited by Quebec nephrologists, that patients are increasingly old and sick, that teams are working to the utmost of their ability and that it is difficult for nursing staff to provide optimal care under these conditions.

Group counseling psychotherapy for patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders: development of new measures for symptom severity and quality of life.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) can benefit from various psychological interventions. The main objective here was to define the contribution of a new psychotherapeutic intervention, group counseling psychotherapy, for the management of FGID patients. Secondary aims included validation of new measures for gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in patients with FGID. Fifty patients seen in a tertiary care center were included in a program of 10 weekly sessions of 2 hr each. Gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and psychological conditions were measured before and after treatment by quantitative indices and by qualitative self-analysis. Gastrointestinal index and quality-of-life index were significantly (P < 0.02) improved at the end of the psychotherapeutic intervention (from 77.5 +/- 4.0 to 63.2 +/- 4.3 and from 67.7 +/- 3.9 to 54.9 +/- 3.9, respectively). In a control group of patients observed for a comparable period of time while waiting for the psychotherapy program, gastrointestinal and quality of life indices remained unchanged. The severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and the quality of life deterioration were highly correlated factors (r = 0.8) at entry into the trial, and their improvement with psychotherapy was also correlated (r = 0.6; P < 0.001). Psychological abnormalities were frequent in these patients (anxiety in 31%, somatization in 29%, depression in 26% of the patients). However, no specific disorder could predict the results of the psychotherapeutic intervention. Over the long term (6-24 months after conclusion of treatment), gastrointestinal status, quality of life, and psychological condition were estimated as improved by 53%, 63%, and 67% of the patients, respectively. The gastrointestinal index and quality of life index we developed were validated to detect the disease and to follow its evolution in response to treatment. In conclusion, group counseling psychotherapy offered a significant contribution for the management, improving gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life, of FGID patients. New measures for symptom severity and quality of life are available.

Rectal distention testing in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of pain sensory thresholds.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Visceral hypersensitivity was detected in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders and has been proposed as a biological marker of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and the predictive values of pain thresholds evaluated by rectal distention using an electronic barostat in patients with or without IBS and in control subjects. METHODS: Patients were diagnosed according to Rome II criteria. Rectal sensory thresholds were determined in 164 patients (86 IBS patients, 26 painless constipation, 21 functional dyspepsia, and 31 miscellaneous conditions) and in 25 normal controls. All subjects underwent a series of rectal isobaric distentions using an electronic barostat. The bag was progressively distended from 0 to 48 mm Hg and, in response to distention, subjects reported on discomfort or pain. RESULTS: Pain thresholds were lower in IBS patients (30.4 +/- 6.7 mm Hg) compared with controls (44.5 +/- 5), painless constipated (45.4 +/- 5.3), functional dyspepsia (39.4 +/- 7.8), and miscellaneous patients (43.2 +/- 5.5). At the level of 40 mm Hg, the sensitivity of the rectal barostat to identify IBS patients from normal subjects and non-IBS patients was 95.5% and its specificity was 71.8%. The positive predictive value was 85.4%. The negative predictive value was 90.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Lowered rectal pain threshold is a hallmark of IBS patients. Rectal barostat testing is useful to confirm the diagnosis of IBS and to discriminate IBS from other causes of abdominal pain.

Evolution of visceral sensitivity in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been associated with visceral hypersensitivity. Here we examined the evolution of rectal sensitivity and of gastrointestinal symptomatology in IBS patients over time, to verify if the clinical and biological parameters showed parallel behavior. Patients complaining of IBS, identified by Rome 1 criteria, were included in this study. The severity of the gastrointestinal (Gastrointestinal) symptoms was assessed by a gastrointestinal index. The pain threshold to rectal distension was measured by a barostat programmed for phasic ascending distensions. Both measures were obtained before and after treatment. Thirty-nine patients were followed while on a 10-week group psychotherapy (psy) program. Twelve patients were controlled after pharmacological treatment with amitriptyline (Ami) 10 mg hours for two weeks and then 25 mg hours for the following 4 weeks. Clinical improvement with symptom reduction was achieved in both patients groups. With psy, the Gastrointestinal index declined from an initial value of 78.4 +/- 4.8 to 65.5 +/- 4.5 at the end of treatment (P < 0.05). With Ami, the gastrointestinal index decreased from 91.6 +/- 5.6 to 61.8 +/- 9.1 (p < 0.01). The pain threshold to rectal distension increased from 27.7 +/- 1.0 to 33.7 +/- 1.9 mmHg (P < 0.01) after drug treatment, but remained unchanged (30.6 +/- 1.0 vs 30.6 +/- 1.1 mm Hg) with psy. Evolution of the gastrointestinal index and rectal sensitivity were directly correlated (r = -0.71; P < 0.01) in Ami patients, but not in those treated with Psy (r = -0.001). In conclusion, visceral hypersensitivity appeared as a stable biological defect over a 10- to 12-week period during clinically-effective treatment with psychotherapy. Rectal pain threshold, however, seemed to be pharmacologically manipulatable in patients treated with Ami.