Screwless scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus: Evaluation of radiologic correction.

BACKGROUND: The scarf osteotomy is a standard procedure to correct hallux valgus. Recent modifications in the technique allow for important translations of the bone fragments without the need for screw fixation. We performed the first prospective analysis of radiographic parameters after a screwless scarf osteotomy. Prospective study of pre- and postoperative standing radiographs of the feet let us quantify angle reduction and shortening, lengthening or lowering of the first metatarsal. METHODS: 100 patients undergoing a screwless scarf osteotomy were evaluated radiographically before and after surgery. The 1-2 IM angle, HVA, length of the first metatarsal, protrusion length and height of the first metatarsal head were measured. RESULTS: The mean 1-2 IM angle was reduced significantly, to a normal range. The mean reduction of the first metatarsal length and protrusion length was 0.3 and 0.14cm respectively. The metatarsal head was lowered 0.3cm on average. CONCLUSIONS: A minimal mean reduction of the first metatarsal length was observed, but it is possible to lengthen the first metatarsal if necessary. In 23% of cases, an increase of protrusion length was obtained. The screwless scarf osteotomy results in a good correction of the 1-2 IM angle and HVA. If necessary, plantarisation of the first metatarsal head could be obtained. Secondary displacement was seen in 1 patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIa, prospective controlled trial.

Relationship of the Medial Clavicular Head to the Manubrium in Normal and Symptomatic Degenerated Sternoclavicular Joints.

BACKGROUND: Clavicular prominence is common in patients with symptomatic degenerative sternoclavicular arthritis. It is unclear if this is caused by enlargement or subluxation of the clavicle. The aim of this report is to describe a reproducible measurement technique to evaluate the relationship of the medial clavicular head to the manubrium. METHODS: One hundred normal sternoclavicular joints, twenty-five sternoclavicular joints with symptomatic degenerative arthritis, and twenty-five non-symptomatic sternoclavicular joints on the contralateral side were studied with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction with use of computer modeling. The greatest width (anterior-posterior distance) and height (superior-inferior distance) of the clavicle in the sagittal plane were measured, and the positions of the anterior and superior borders of the medial clavicle and their distances to the frontal and axial planes, respectively, were evaluated. The ratio of the anterior-posterior distance to the anterior-frontal plane distance was measured to evaluate the anterior-posterior position of the clavicle and the ratio of the superior-inferior distance to the superior-axial plane distance was measured to evaluate its superoinferior position. If the ratio was not in the 95% normal range, the clavicle was defined as subluxated. The reproducibility of this technique was evaluated on the basis of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: This technique showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The mean anterior-posterior and superior-inferior distances were significantly larger in association with symptomatic sternoclavicular arthritis than in the normal sternoclavicular joints (p < 0001). The clavicle was subluxated anteriorly in twenty-two of the twenty-five cases of symptomatic sternoclavicular arthritis, but it was not subluxated superiorly. CONCLUSIONS: The medial clavicular head in patients with degenerative sternoclavicular arthritis is significantly larger than it is in the normal population, and it is usually subluxated anteriorly.

Revision of meniscal transplants: long-term clinical follow-up.

PURPOSE: The primary aim is to document objective and subjective clinical outcome after knee arthroplasty for failed meniscal allograft transplantation; secondly, to investigate the influence of previous meniscal allograft surgery on the clinical outcome after a knee arthroplasty procedure; thirdly, to identify possible prognostic factors for the failure of meniscal allograft, such as potential number of concomitant procedures or pre-transplantation HSS-scores. The study population was compared to a control group of primary total knee arthroplasties. METHODS: The pre-operative phase, prior to meniscal allograft transplantation, was evaluated by the HSS questionnaire. At final follow-up, the clinical outcome was evaluated by the HSS, KOOS and SF-36 questionnaires. The mean follow-up was 16 years and 2 months. The control group, matched for age and sex, comprised patients with primary total knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that for the HSS-scores, there was no significant difference between the study population and the control group. KOOS data showed that the control group scored better overall. There was no significant difference between the HSS-scores after the transplantation and after the knee prosthesis. However, both showed a significant improvement regarding the clinical condition before meniscal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results after revised meniscal transplantation by means of knee prosthesis are highly variable with a tendency to have a lower score than patients with a primary knee prosthesis. Patients who underwent a revision of their meniscal allograft transplantation by means of a knee arthroplasty still had a significant better clinical outcome than prior to the meniscal allograft transplantation. There were no prognostic factors found by which one can determine whether a meniscal allograft will have a good survival or not.