Kounis syndrome: from an unexpected case in the Emergency Room to a review of the literature.

Kounis syndrome (KS) is a coronary syndrome in the setting of allergic/anaphylactic reactions and can be classified in three variants: vasospastic allergic angina (type I), allergic myocardial infarction (type II) and stent thrombosis (type III). The early diagnosis is of paramount importance for the correct management and the prognosis, being KS a life-threatening emergency condition. KS is not uncommon, but it is frequently unrecognized or undiagnosed in virtue of its broad clinical manifestations. The diagnosis should be based on the combination of cardiovascular and allergic/anaphylactic clinical symptoms and signs, as well as on laboratory, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and angiographic evidence. ECG monitoring, cardiac enzymes and troponin are mandatory to confirm or exclude KS in a patient with subclinical or clinical, acute or chronic allergic reactions. Nevertheless, the treatment is a real challenge for the emergency clinicians because guidelines have not been established yet, and the therapy is based on the variant type. We herein report the case of type I KS in a woman with no prior history of allergy, admitted to our emergency department for abdominal pain, nausea and hematochezia. Starting from this case we conducted a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Medline, using the keywords of "Kounis syndrome", "coronary spams", "cardiac arrest", "sudden death", "allergy", and "anaphylaxis". The main purpose of this review is to remind emergency clinicians to keep a high index of suspicion regarding KS when dealing with patients with allergic reactions or anaphylaxis to promptly identify and correctly manage KS.

A simple lung ultrasound protocol for the screening of COVID-19 pneumonia in the emergency department.

The most relevant manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is interstitial pneumonia. Several lung ultrasound (US) protocols for pneumonia diagnosis are used in clinical practice, but none has been proposed for COVID-19 patients' screening in the emergency department. We adopted a simplified 6-scan lung US protocol for COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis (LUSCOP) and compared its sensitivity with high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in patients suspected for COVID-19, presenting to one Emergency Department from February 21st to March 15th, 2020, during the outbreak burst in northern Italy. Patients were retrospectively enrolled if both LUSCOP protocol and HRCT were performed in the Emergency Department. The sensitivity of LUSCOP protocol and HRCT were compared. COVID-19 pneumonia's final diagnosis was based on real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction from nasal-pharyngeal swab and on clinical data. Out of 150 suspected COVID-19 patients, 131 were included in the study, and 130 had a final diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. The most frequent lung ultrasonographic features were: bilateral B-pattern in 101 patients (77%), B-pattern with subpleural consolidations in 26 (19.8%) and lung consolidations in 2 (1.5%). LUSCOP Protocol was consistent with HRCT in correctly screening 130 out of the 131 COVID-19 pneumonia cases (99.2%). In one case COVID-19 pneumonia was excluded by both HRCT and lung US. LUSCOP protocol showed optimal sensitivity and can be proposed as a simple screening tool for COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis in the context of outbreak burst areas where prompt isolation of suspected patients is crucial for patients' and operators' safety.