Feasibility of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris and a Cardiac Implanted Electronic Device.

OBJECTIVES: Five to 10% of patients with stable coronary artery disease have refractory angina pectoris (RAP). These patients are restricted in performing daily activities due to angina pectoris. Spinal cord stimulation is a last resort treatment option. A number of this patient population also has an indication for a cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) (pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator). Manufacturers of spinal cord stimulators have stated a warning that interference can occur between the spinal cord stimulator and the CIED. Consequently, only a limited number of patients with RAP and a CIED have received a spinal cord stimulator. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to determine whether spinal cord stimulation can be safely used in patients with RAP and a CIED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with RAP referred to our center were screened and included if 1) the patient received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment for RAP and if 2) the patient received a CIED either prior to or after spinal cord stimulator implantation. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treadmill test was used as a screening tool to determine whether the patient was eligible for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator. Interference between the spinal cord stimulator and CIED was checked 1) after TENS treadmill test, 2) during implantation of spinal cord stimulator or CIED, 3) during mode switches of the SCS, and 4) during regular out patient follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 22 patients had both a spinal cord stimulator and a CIED with an average follow-up duration of 44.5 months. No interference between the spinal cord stimulator and CIED was found. CONCLUSION: Spinal cord stimulation can be safely applied in patients with a CIED provided that the CIED is checked for interference during implantation, if mode switches of the SCS occurred and once yearly after implantation according to routine follow-up.

Single-Center Experience With High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) which was first used in 1987 and led to a reduction in the number of angina pectoris episodes, less consumption of short-acting nitrates, and an improvement in the quality of life. The conventional mode of stimulation leads to paresthesia felt at the target area. In recent years novel modes of stimulation have been developed that are paresthesia free, such as "burst," "high-density (HD)," or "high-frequency/10 kHz" stimulation. To date, these new modes of stimulation have not been used in patients with RAP and a spinal cord stimulator. This retrospective, single-center, observational study gives a description of the experience of using HD stimulation in selected patients with RAP being treated with SCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with RAP who received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment at our center from September 2009 to February 2021 were screened. Patients were eligible for inclusion into this retrospective, observational study if 1) patients had used HD stimulation, or 2) were currently using HD stimulation. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients out of a total of 157 patients who had a spinal cord stimulator due to RAP use or have used HD stimulation. In most patients (79.2%), the reason for switching from conventional to HD stimulation was due to progression of symptoms under conventional stimulation. The average duration of conventional stimulation use prior to switching to HD stimulation was 40.3 (± 29.6) months. In total, 26 patients (of 53 patients; 49.1%) were using HD stimulation at the end of the follow-up period or until lost to follow-up, and two patients used both forms of stimulation interchangeably. Five patients (9.4%) had stopped using SCS, and 20 patients (37.7%) switched back to conventional stimulation due to a variety of reasons. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that the use of HD stimulation in patients with RAP being treated with SCS could be an alternative option for conventional stimulation. Due to the nature of this study, additional research is essential to confirm these initial findings.

Hypothermia for Cardioprotection in Patients with St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Do Not Give It the Cold Shoulder Yet!

The timely revascularization of an occluded coronary artery is the cornerstone of treatment in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). As essential as this treatment is, it can also cause additional damage to cardiomyocytes that were still viable before reperfusion, increasing infarct size. This has been termed "myocardial reperfusion injury". To date, there is still no effective treatment for myocardial reperfusion injury in patients with STEMI. While numerous attempts have been made to overcome this hurdle with various experimental therapies, the common denominator of these therapies is that, although they often work in the preclinical setting, they fail to demonstrate the same results in human trials. Hypothermia is an example of such a therapy. Although promising results were derived from experimental studies, multiple randomized controlled trials failed to do the same. This review includes a discussion of hypothermia as a potential treatment for myocardial reperfusion injury, including lessons learned from previous (negative) trials, advanced techniques and materials in current hypothermic treatment, and the possible future of hypothermia for cardioprotection in patients with STEMI.

Single center experience in the treatment of hemodynamically significant diffuse coronary artery disease of the left anterior descending.

INTRODUCTION: To date there are no recommendations on how to treat patients with an FFR positive but diffusely diseased left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not so evident due to doubts regarding longevity and patency. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study assessed clinical outcomes in patients presenting with symptomatic single vessel coronary artery disease of a diffusely diseased, hemodynamically significant LAD treated by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) between 2015 and 2020. Primary outcome of this study was the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization during 2-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints consisted of the individual components of the primary endpoint. Change in angina severity grade based on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class between baseline and 2-year follow-up was assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included of which 25 patients underwent CABG and 34 patients were treated by OMT. There was a statistically significant difference in FFR value at baseline between the treatment groups (CABG 0.70 ± 0.04; OMT 0.75 ± 0.04; p < 0.001). After 2-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences with regard to the primary endpoint (CABG 16% (n = 4); OMT 17.6% (n = 6); p = 1.00) and secondary endpoints between the groups over 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with hemodynamically significant diffuse single vessel coronary artery disease of the left anterior descending, there was no difference between OMT and CABG in terms of mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization and symptom reduction after two years of follow-up.

Case report regarding the evolution of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features in cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis is an important cause for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. It is often under diagnosed due to the fact that clinicians do not always recognize the specific diagnostic findings associated with this disease, also leading to the wrong diagnosis. When left untreated further irreversible organ dysfunction occurs, with high morbidity and mortality rates. CASE SUMMARY: A 71-year-old patient presented with progressive exertional dyspnoea and angina pectoris at the outpatient clinic. Medical history noted a percutaneous coronary intervention of the right coronary artery due to stable angina pectoris. The electrocardiogram showed low voltage in the limb leads and pseudo-infarct pattern in the precordial leads. Echocardiographic findings included left and right ventricular hypertrophy, decreased left ventricular systolic function, restrictive diastolic function, and 'relative' apical sparing of the left ventricle. This led to the suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis, which was confirmed with a positive bone scintigraphy using 99mTechnecium-DPD and the absence of monoclonal proteins. Treatment with Tafamidis was initiated. DISCUSSION: Electrocardiographic findings suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis are low voltage in the limb leads and/or a pseudo-infarct pattern in the precordial leads. Important echocardiographic findings are left and right ventricular hypertrophy, restrictive diastolic function, 'relative' apical sparing of the left ventricle and impaired left atrial strain. The next step in confirming the diagnosis is 99mTechnecium PYP/DPD/HMDP bone scintigraphy and testing for monoclonal proteins. The diagnosis ATTR amyloidosis is confirmed by the combination of positive bone scintigraphy (Perugini Grade 2 or 3) and the absence of monoclonal proteins, without the necessity of performing an endomyocardial biopsy.

Case report of SARS Co-V2 infection, acute pulmonary embolism, and right ventricular thrombus.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a novel disease that has been associated with changes in haemostasis and increased risk of thrombosis, especially in patients who are critically ill. CASE SUMMARY: a 71-year-old patient presented to the emergency department with acute respiratory failure. The patient had been discharged from the hospital 1 day before, after apparent recovery of a proven COVID-19 infection. Relevant medical history reports polycythemia vera. The diagnostic work-up included a CT-scan of the thorax, revealing bilateral sub-segmental pulmonary embolism. An echocardiogram showed a dilated right ventricle with poor systolic function and a large multi-lobar thrombus. Forty-eight hours after initiation of treatment with therapeutic anticoagulation the thrombus was no longer seen on the echocardiogram. DISCUSSION: This case confirms the high risk of thrombosis in COVID-19 infection as has been described in recent literature. It demonstrates the severity of the coagulopathy given the presence of both bilateral sub-segmental pulmonary embolism and right ventricular thrombus, despite treatment with prophylactic anticoagulation. Remarkable in this case is the fact that the patient had a myeloproliferative neoplasm (polycythaemia vera). This is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, especially in the presence of erythrocytosis, leucocytosis, and/or inflammation.

Is it possible to differentiate between Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction?

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have investigated the ability of the twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to reliably distinguish Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) from an acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In these studies, only ECG changes were required - ST-segment deviation and/or T-wave inversion - in TC whereas in acute anterior STEMI, ECGs had to meet STEMI criteria. In the majority of these studies, patients of both genders were used even though TC predominantly occurs in women. The aim of this study is to see whether TC can be distinguished from acute anterior STEMI in a predominantly female study population where all patients meet STEMI-criteria. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the ST-segment changes was done on the triage ECGs of 37 patients with TC (34 female) and was compared to the triage ECGs of 103 female patients with acute anterior STEMI. The latter group was divided into the following subgroups: 46 patients with proximal, 47 with mid and 10 with distal LAD occlusion. Three ST-segment based ECG features were investigated: (1) Existing criterion for differentiating anterior STEMI from TC: ST-segment depression >0.5mm in lead aVR+ST-segment elevation ≤1mm in lead V1, (2) frontal plane ST-vector and (3) mean amplitude of ST-segment deviation in each lead. RESULTS: The existing ECG criterion was less accurate (76%) than in the original study (95%), with a large difference in sensitivity (26% vs. 91%). Only a frontal plane ST-vector of 60° could significantly distinguish TC from all acute anterior STEMI subgroups (p<0.01) with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 81%. The mean amplitude in inferior leads II and aVF was significantly higher for patients with TC compared to all patients with acute anterior STEMI (p<0.01 and p<0.05 respectively) and the mean amplitude in the precordial leads V1 and V2 was significantly lower compared to proximal and mid LAD occlusion (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Given the consequences of missing the diagnosis of an acute anterior STEMI the diagnostic accuracy of the ECG criteria investigated in this retrospective study were insufficient to reliably distinguish patients with TC from patients with an acute anterior STEMI. To definitely exclude the diagnosis of an acute anterior STEMI coronary angiography, which remains the gold standard, will need to be performed.